Erin Reed / Anthony Reed II / @ErinInTheMorn / @ErinInTheMorning / @ErinInTheNight / _supernovasky_ / beholderseye / realitybias / AnonymousRabbit - post-op transbian Twitter/TikTok "activist" with bad fashion, giant Reddit tattoo. Former drug dealer with felony. Married to Zooey Simone Zephyr / Zachary Todd Raasch.

[Accept Only Substitutes]

Someone on tumblr referenced Snaggletooth favourably. Tumblr is of a pooner whose manly interests are sewing, embroidery, and reblogging cutesy fanart. Archive.

No, I will not open my house and wallet. I did that a couple times, with sane people I love, who also aren't degenerates. Both times ended badly. Never again, not even for family.

Pay for your own shit, like every other adult has to. There are a few things I will give money to, mostly people who need money for pet injuries, and then rarely.

>Kennedy 18
>Kennedy 16
>Kennedy 14
>Kennedy 11
Wow, is he really that popular?

Spoiler: Moai alert

What I think you're seeing is the effect of "both candidates suck more than usual" here more than anything else. Kennedy splitting off third party is going to cost one of the candidates the race, not because he'll win, but he's just popular enough to people to give him "fuck you" votes. It's too early to tell which of the two candidates he's going to hurt the most, he's positioned himself as being a moderate, "more sensible" choice. In previous years I'd have said his anti-vax opinions would hurt him, but I think they make him more attractive to the crazies on the right who are convinced the Covid shot is giving everyone turbo cancer and heart failure (I'm aware there is a slight risk of heart failure after the shot, but it's not as dire as these retards think it is). Trump's one real accomplishment was the Covid shot, and apparently he's hammering that hard in rallys and speeches. I'm seeing Republicans on Twitter moaning about it anyway.

 

[gagabobo1997]

Someone on tumblr referenced Snaggletooth favourably. Tumblr is of a pooner whose manly interests are sewing, embroidery, and reblogging cutesy fanart. Archive.
View attachment 5843289
View attachment 5843291
They couldn't even resist drawing the ugly ass zippertits. What's going on with the anatomy of that right arm?
View attachment 5843292
Damn, that's a lot of people! You'd think there'd be more of a fuss, eh Erin?
View attachment 5843293
View attachment 5843294
Masked pooner is crossing her arms and looking tough! Watch out, transphobes!
View attachment 5843295
Why are they all so fucking fat?
View attachment 5843296
That study is here btw, and I do believe it was discussed ITT.
View attachment 5843297
View attachment 5843299
Your joy does not entail my approval, nor does it entail you grooming other vulnerable people into your cult. Erin himself would see tons of trans kids mutilated and destroyed provided it fits his endgame. This was never about 'personal choice' - especially since you want the government paying for this care and GOT IT quicker than normies get coverage for dental care or necessary surgery. That is one reason why we hate you.
View attachment 5843306
Get that? Erin is totes going to these state capitols and rearing his ugly head, rather than make Zach do it all for him.
View attachment 5843301
"No one under 18-19 gets surgery"
"OH MY GOD THEY'RE BANNING PROCEDURES WE SAY NEVER HAPPENS"

>"You're literally talking about internally displaced political refugees"
I moved away from Cali because of the cucked gun laws, does that mean I'm a political refugee? If so how do I farm my status as one for money?

 

[Geranium]

I moved away from Cali because of the cucked gun laws, does that mean I'm a political refugee? If so how do I farm my status as one for money?

Yes, if you're as retarded as Tony, you are a refugee fleeing a genocide.

 

[Not Dr. Evil]

Myopic, one sided, with extreme black and white thinking is the new "more than fair."

Side sperg: Tony's understandiing of what "more than fair" looks like provides loads of explanatory power about his string of failed relationships and why his divorce was so messy and acrimonious.

 

[Accept Only Substitutes]

Just because other bills/riders failed doesn't mean they've failed permanently. The bathroom bills failed in 2016 or whatever and yet in 2023 we passed several of them, or similar restrictions. The pendulum is very obviously swinging back, Tony is just coping here. Probably doing a little seething too.

 

[unwieldy_object]

Just because other bills/riders failed doesn't mean they've failed permanently. The bathroom bills failed in 2016 or whatever and yet in 2023 we passed several of them, or similar restrictions. The pendulum is very obviously swinging back, Tony is just coping here. Probably doing a little seething too.

Tbh there's never a point when I don't imagine him seething.
He's always full of barely constrained rage.

 

[AnOminous]

Just because other bills/riders failed doesn't mean they've failed permanently. The bathroom bills failed in 2016 or whatever and yet in 2023 we passed several of them, or similar restrictions. The pendulum is very obviously swinging back, Tony is just coping here. Probably doing a little seething too.

Imagine the sheer agony of these faggots. They thought "all I have to do is cut off my balls and have my cock turned into a necrotizing sleeve of decaying flesh and I get to be KING of the world forever!" And now that they've cut their dicks off they find that everyone actually hates their fucking guts.

The actual average person, the MAN on the street, is absolutely repulsed by a man so mentally diseased that he permanently mutilates his genitals for a disgusting fetish.

 

[Your_deadname_here]

Imagine the sheer agony of these faggots. They thought "all I have to do is cut off my balls and have my cock turned into a necrotizing sleeve of decaying flesh and I get to be KING of the world forever!" And now that they've cut their dicks off they find that everyone actually hates their fucking guts.

The actual average person, the MAN on the street, is absolutely repulsed by a man so mentally diseased that he permanently mutilates his genitals for a disgusting fetish.

I seriously don't understand how and why they expect the world to stop, recalibrate, and adjust every time a single individual in the cult has an issue. Planet Fitness for instance. A lady snaps a Pic of a man shaving his face in a woman locker room. They ban the actual woman. Why? Given the known hit you're going to take in the profits, why are you catering to small, fringe demographic?

Manson once said, "No sense makes sense." Well fuck Charlie you prophet, Helter Skelter is indeed coming down fast, and it's real witchy. Anthony Reed is a dangerous man. He found a niche he could finally operate. It's all he's ever wanted. A bully pulpit. He has always wanted to be admired and not to be taken as the fop he's proven to be. Now, he's getting noticed by influential people. His hubris will ultimately be his downfall. He is far too fragile to be in any sustainable position of authority. He's going to overstep eventually, and it will be glorious. He thinks he's Zues in Clash of the Titans, he and Zac probably move little figures around a game board to impose fate.

Can't wait for the wedding.

 

[Not Dr. Evil]

I seriously don't understand how and why they expect the world to stop, recalibrate, and adjust every time a single individual in the cult has an issue. Planet Fitness for instance. A lady snaps a Pic of a man shaving his face in a woman locker room. They ban the actual woman. Why? Given the known hit you're going to take in the profits, why are you catering to small, fringe demographic?

I do have to give the troons credit where credit is due for the one unforeseeable victory they achieved. Namely, they have convinced militant third wave feminists that the voices, interests, and goals of biological women must yield to the sexual fetishes of mentally ill men playing make believe.

 

[AirdropShitposts]

Confidently wrong.

View attachment 5843068
View attachment 5843069View attachment 5843070

No, those polls aren't what prove Tony wrong. Those elections he's referencing prove Tony wrong. As Tony confidently tells us all the time, troon issues aren't considered the top issues in polls. Thus, as anyone who paid attention to any of these would know, troon issues did not cause these elections to be won or lost. Same as troon issues didn't cause DeSantis to win by 20 points.

He also points to spending about troon issues but as I show repeatedly they are pocket change in the spending in these races. Nobody even cares about troon issues in these races. He's ascribing entire state-wide races with millions of votes with incumbent politicians as being decided on troon issues based on the challengers mentioning the issues once when asked or some irrelevant group running an ad nobody saw. Two of these races listed were extensively focused on abortion rights, you know actual women's issues with huge base activation and actual huge spending involved, yet Tony folds them in as being about troon issues because somebody mentioned it one time because somebody yelled "and also trans women" maybe.

We also saw Tony already pull a counter to what you're trying to suggest with Trump polls by arguing that Republican victories in 2022 were smaller than they "should have been" because Republicans focused too much on troon issues even though barely anybody even ran on it let alone made it their top issue. Heads I win, tails you lose.

Oh my god is she legitimately saying that because individual US states tried to maintain slavery in the past, states today should have no autonomy? Also no, they do not function as individual countries, in fact the outcome of the American civil war pretty much decided that they have less authority than the federal government. If you don't like your state's laws then fucking leave, and it's not as if living in a red state means you need to seek shelter from anti-trans right-wing death squads. Not to mention chopping off your tits is not "basic healthcare", it's moreso in the lane of elective plastic surgery.

It's actually even more historically stupid. The slave states didn't want to give states the power to maintain slavery, they wanted to actively use the federal government to force slavery to be maintained by the rest of the states. The Fugitive Slave Law and Dred Scott ruling are the most obvious points but they also did things like coerce the federal mail to block abolitionist writings. Letting states be the deciders to have slavery or not was the compromise because otherwise it would have been mandated nationwide not allow some states to undermine things by freeing the slaves if they got there. (Hence why the Underground Railroad couldn't terminate just North of the Mason-Dixon Line but had to go all the way to Canada.)

"State rights" (really powers) weren't created to protect slavery, they were created because the states were independent entities that amalgamated in the Union and weren't willing to just hand over their historical independence and powers to an entity they couldn't control. The states cared about this for every issue, not just slavery, so they simply didn't cede the powers in the first place. Only one state had even ended slavery when the Constitution came into effect. There was a majority of slave states, they didn't necessarily have to fear the feds ending it on them. (They did have to fear this later, starting around 1850 or so, and then this whole thing happened regarding it but I don't remember how it turned out.)

 

[AMHOLIO]

State rights" (really powers) weren't created to protect slavery, they were created because the states were independent entities that amalgamated in the Union and weren't willing to just hand over their historical independence and powers to an entity they couldn't control.

It's a huge concept and even a foreign concept to consider and comprehend to younger minds unfamiliar with such concepts. The runnings of government, how America got its start and why it did so are big esoteric concepts that are best learned through going through American government history, but that's boooring. If you're under 19 I can forgive part of it, if you're over it and been to college or bother to comment on history related politics I can't. It's hard to imagine the concept since it is a lot to keep track of and today most young people see slavery as a TERRIBLE FUCKING THING (justifiably so) that NO good or non-evil person would consider doing. But the American Civil War was about racism/slavery, the economy, and state's rights, possibly in equal measures depending on what person you talked to back during the conflict. Human views on things over time change, and it's hard to recognize the more conceptual and law related concepts if your world view is based on good OR bad, and maybe bad but fan turn good plus good but can turn bad.

That was a lot of words to ease into saying this comic writer is a stunted (wo)manchild who cannot see anything from a historical context and opts for the exaggerated good and evil view.

 

[Geranium]

Thread by @ErinInTheMorn on Thread Reader App – Thread Reader App (archive; archive via Tor)

Erin Reed (@ErinInTheMorn) posted at Monday, 25 March 2024 at 13:20:10 UTC
https://twitter.com/ErinInTheMorn/status/1772252134232191085

Transgender women have a biological advantage at... Darts?

That's what is being claimed by a few people who are trying to get Noa-Lynn Van Leuven removed from a women's darts team.

There is no evidence transgender women are better at angles and throwing a dart.

I wrote an article on transgender dart players a few months ago. Go and give it a read - the controversy is rather ridiculous and shows that anti-trans sports bans are about exclusion, not advantages.

And don't forget to subscribe to support my work.

https://www.erininthemorning.com/p/anti-trans-activists-now-claim-women

While I'm open to an argument that male advantage in explosive power is important in darts, more fundamentally women deserve their own competitions and spaces separate from men. This would be true even if it weren't the case that prominent male darts players are sex offenders. Former World Champion darts player Ted Hankey jailed after sexual assault caught on camera | ITV News Granada (archive; archive via Tor)

 

[TyrasGuard]

I wrote an article on transgender dart players a few months ago. Go and give it a read - the controversy is rather ridiculous and shows that anti-trans sports bans are about exclusion, not advantages.

Oh please, how thrilling. Tell me more about transgender dart players.

 

[luigismanslave]

While I'm open to an argument that male advantage in explosive power is important in darts, more fundamentally women deserve their own competitions and spaces separate from men. This would be true even if it weren't the case that prominent male darts players are sex offenders.

I'm personally sick of the sexist darts rerun, hoping Tony re-airs the sexist chess episode soon, that one is very classy.

 

[Geranium]

I'm personally sick of the sexist darts rerun, hoping Tony re-airs the sexist chess episode soon, that one is very classy.

“If you want a picture of the future, imagine Tony turning up to your women’s chess tournament / darts league / WI meeting / mother-and-baby swim session — forever.”

 

[expectant asshole]

I’ve only played darts a handful of times, but I’m pretty sure having longer arms would be an advantage. And there’s the social aspects of who can hang out on pubs for long time playing darts…

 

[lamppost]

Yeah Tony, it's not that you shouldn't be involved in women's sports because of the obvious genetic advantage, that was just low hanging fruit due to how absurd men competing in physical sports with women is. It's an easy TERF win.

The actual point is that you are a man, and women deserve their own spaces away from you.

 

[goblin enby]

There's no evidence I'm better at soccer than the Manchester United under-16 youth team. Therefore I should be allowed to compete in U-16 soccer. This is the crux of Tony's argument. Subscribe to support my work.

 

[Jacques1194]

Thread by @ErinInTheMorn on Thread Reader App – Thread Reader App (archive; archive via Tor)

While I'm open to an argument that male advantage in explosive power is important in darts, more fundamentally women deserve their own competitions and spaces separate from men. This would be true even if it weren't the case that prominent male darts players are sex offenders. Former World Champion darts player Ted Hankey jailed after sexual assault caught on camera | ITV News Granada (archive; archive via Tor)

They were discussing this on Ovarit.Here's a question to ask Tony.If there's no difference between the sexes with darts then why have a men's division and women's division at all?Why don't the TIMs go in the men's category, if their odds are the same?Why doesn't Noa-Lynn challenge any male dart player and prove to the world that "women" can beat men at darts, and thus proving that there's no point in have separate divisions?

 

[Not Dr. Evil]

“If you want a picture of the future, imagine Tony turning up to your women’s chess tournament / darts league / WI meeting / mother-and-baby swim session — forever.”

Using Tony's faulty logic in the darts context, he would be saying that there is no meaningful difference between the Arizona Diamondback's Randy Johnson and an average Jane Doe off the street.

All 27 Outs from Randy Johnson's Perfect Game