PurpleNeoal
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2020
There's alot of "mods" putting Osana as a rival, how people can make changes on the code? Those scripts are a mess, also each time the player picks something there's a sfx sampling Alex voice...
Cultcow EvaXephon / Yanderedev / Alex Mahan / Alexander Stuart Mahan / cannotgoogleme - Edgy weeaboo coomer with pedo tendencies and 15+ years internet history as a lolcow, now known as a disaster developer behind eternal debug build called "Yandere Simulator", confirmed groomer and dollfucker
- Thread starter Juan But Not Forgotten
- Start date
-
🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Μusk
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2020
Actualized Potentialities
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2020
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2020
Wow, I missed a lot while I was gone...
Anyways, way back when I was still lurking this thread, I had a feeling that Alex and his cum chalice would become a big meme one day. I actually wanted it to become a meme. I just found the video so funny and ridiculous at the time that I felt that someone would eventually find it and meme the shit out of it.
Now that I think about it, I really, really wish that it never became a meme... it might've brought us lots of temporary laughs, but all we get out of it now is a bunch of unfunny Reddit weens....
Anyways, way back when I was still lurking this thread, I had a feeling that Alex and his cum chalice would become a big meme one day. I actually wanted it to become a meme. I just found the video so funny and ridiculous at the time that I felt that someone would eventually find it and meme the shit out of it.
Now that I think about it, I really, really wish that it never became a meme... it might've brought us lots of temporary laughs, but all we get out of it now is a bunch of unfunny Reddit weens....
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2017
Here is the video about this shitshow.
God, I hope he isn't some puny wanker, like TRO, who refused to look any further into Alex, refused to look at his EvaXephon days at all, because "it was long ago" and dismissed two thirds of the accusations against Alex, because he said "no, I'm not" or "I'm sorry I did that, it's all those fucking gremlins". Damn, that video was a waste of time.
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2020
I second your grievances about TRO's Alex video. For the length that the video was, he could've made it a whole lot longer by addressing Alex's past towards the beginning of the video and briefly discuss the allegations against him. He brought up the farms like one time but I 100% guarantee that a huge bulk of his research into Alex came from this thread alone. If he credited us more in the video though, I have a feeling that a lot of jimmies would've been rustled because of our reputation as a "hate" site...
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2017
No, thanks, I don't need any praise from these hacks. And when he mentioned Farms, he mentioned them in a sense, that they are responsible for the wave of trolling that slowed development to a halt and turned Alex into easily triggered suicide baiting manchild we know today, which can be easily disproven by a brief look into his EvaXephon days. Fuck that guy.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2020
Now that I think about it, I feel that if he did give us more credit, weens would've poured into this thread en masse a whole lot sooner and we'd get a fuckton of twelvies from Alex's fandom calling us out for "making him so suicidal" and other BS. Still, TRO could've at least gone into more depth about Alex's past. The lack of that was one of the things that killed the video for me.
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2020
TRO was so soy there.
I've seen him go after people so hard before, especially accused pedophiles. But with Alex, he made every effort to not do so.
He could have just presented the Evaxephon material clinically and let his audience make their own minds up.
I've seen him go after people so hard before, especially accused pedophiles. But with Alex, he made every effort to not do so.
He could have just presented the Evaxephon material clinically and let his audience make their own minds up.
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2017
Pretty much. Just compare this to him ripping into Onision or Daddy'O'Five. First gaslighted all of his past victims and critics and the other has been pretending to have demonstrative remorse since he was caught, but he believed none of it. Probably, because they didn't tell "No, I'm not!".
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2018
"In short: No I didn't."
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2020
"In short: No, I did not fuck my dog
In long: What if my dog had a sex license? Would it be wrong to fuck my dog if he had a sex license? I
sorry i cant finish this
Μusk
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2020
Another video came out from one of the Yandere Simulator contributors:
There's supposed to be another video coming out tomorrow that's going to have more of Alex speaking in it, as well.
There's supposed to be another video coming out tomorrow that's going to have more of Alex speaking in it, as well.
Last edited:
- Joined
- May 7, 2019
Yes, he made a post on his debunking page
https://www.yanderesimulator.com/debunk/
https://archive.md/Bbpkp
Last edited:
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2014
TRO's general Schick seems to be trying presenting himself as neutral and generous as possible when he can. I remember his review of 13 Reasons Why, where he used really soft language and assumed good faith on the part of the show's creators then entire time, and it was jarring because the stuff he was showing and describing from the series was so ludicrous, exploitative and just plain stupid that I assumed there must have been some redeeming quality about the show that I just wasn't seeing.
Then when IHE (who I don't even like generally) showed up and just bluntly said what was obvious: "this show is a dumb piece of shit, they're not doing this to help people they're prostituting serious issues in a cheap, juvenile way for money and all the characters in the show are awful people" it felt like a breath of fresh air.
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2020
HAHAHA HE ACTUALLY PUT LINKS TO PHOTOS:
THIS IS THE BEST ONE THOUGH:
IM SO SORRY BUT IM FUCKING LOSING IT HE ACTUALLY WROTE THIS SHIT OUT!!
In short: No, I don't.
No, not really.
One day, in 2014, I received hatemail from someone who was offended by Yandere Simulator. It was actually the very first time anyone had ever sent me hatemail about Yandere Sim. Because I felt attacked, I started arguing with the person who sent the hatemail.
They said, "Your game is creepy because the characters are underage," and I responded, "The age of consent is different in every country, so does that mean the game is only creepy in SOME countries?" The reason why I responded this way is because I wanted to feel like I was slapping them with a witty comeback. I wanted to be contrarian towards them purely for the sake of being contrarian. I was pursuing the sensation of, "Ha ha! Got 'em! They must feel really stupid right now!" To cope with the fact that I had received hatemail, I wanted to feel like I had "defeated" the person who sent the hatemail.
They had a rebuttal, so I responded with a rebuttal of my own, and we kept going back and forth. I focused exclusively on trying to contradict everything they said.
Eventually, they started talking about pedophilia. In order to continue pursuing the sensation of, "Haha, I slapped them with an epic comeback!" I had to start contradicting whatever they said about pedophiles, which led to me making a series of statements that looked like I was defending pedophiles. For example, if they said, "Pedophiles are evil," I would respond by saying, "Pedophilia is involuntary, just like a mental illness or sexual orientation!" because I only cared about one thing: contradicting everything they said, in order to feel like I had "won" the arguement.
Eventually, the conversation somehow turned to the topic of "abolishing the age of consent." This was the first time in the conversation that I actually felt like we had arrived at an intellectually engaging subject. Some people mentally develop at different speeds than other people - this means that one "age of consent" doesn't work for everyone. For example, some people might be mentally developed enough to have sex at age 18, but other people might not be mentally developed enough to make that decision until age 19 or 20. For this reason, the concept of an age of consent is slightly flawed.
It was an interesting hypothetical thought experiment, so I actually put a bit of thought into it. If the age of consent had to be replaced by something else, what would it be replaced with? Instead of selecting an arbitrary number to permit people to have sex, what else could you do? Well, it would be convenient if there was a machine you could place on your head that would scan your brain and determine your current level of mental development. If this machine was 100% accurate, then it would be able to objectively determine whether or not a person is "ready for sex".
The way I phrased this was really stupid; I said something like, "What if there was a sex test, and if you pass it, you get a sex license? Wouldn't that be better than having an age of consent?" This was a stupid explanation, because it completely left out all of the nuance of what I was actually trying to say.
The person I was arguing with was mortified, and asked, "What if a 14-year-old passed the test? Would you permit them to sex?" It was an invalid question, because no 14-year-old could possibly mentally develop fast enough to pass the brain-scan test. It simply would never happen. But, because I was in "Contrarian Mode" and just wanted to contradict everything this person said, I simply responded, "Yeah! If the test is designed to prove something objectively true, then it must be objectively true!" Which has created a false narrative that I think 14-year-olds should be allowed to have sex.
In short, everything I said during that conversation was said purely to be contrarian and contradictory towards my opponent so that I could feel like I was "winning" the arguement. I don't stand by those statements; they are as meaningless as any other statement that you might make in a moment of anger when you're in a heated debate with someone.
After hearing this, my opponent expressed an intention to screenshot the e-mails we'd exchanged, and post the screenshots publicly in order to "expose" me as an evil pedophile. As soon as I was aware that this person was planning to spread bizarre propaganda and smear my name, I wrote a pre-emptive response where I summarized the entire situation so that they couldn't create a false narrative about me.
Unfortunately, ill-meaning individuals cropped my post to create a false narrative that I want to abolish the age of consent and replace it with "sex licenses".
Please don't be gullible enough to be fooled by trolls who take my words out-of-context in an attempt to commit character assassination.
No, not really.
One day, in 2014, I received hatemail from someone who was offended by Yandere Simulator. It was actually the very first time anyone had ever sent me hatemail about Yandere Sim. Because I felt attacked, I started arguing with the person who sent the hatemail.
They said, "Your game is creepy because the characters are underage," and I responded, "The age of consent is different in every country, so does that mean the game is only creepy in SOME countries?" The reason why I responded this way is because I wanted to feel like I was slapping them with a witty comeback. I wanted to be contrarian towards them purely for the sake of being contrarian. I was pursuing the sensation of, "Ha ha! Got 'em! They must feel really stupid right now!" To cope with the fact that I had received hatemail, I wanted to feel like I had "defeated" the person who sent the hatemail.
They had a rebuttal, so I responded with a rebuttal of my own, and we kept going back and forth. I focused exclusively on trying to contradict everything they said.
Eventually, they started talking about pedophilia. In order to continue pursuing the sensation of, "Haha, I slapped them with an epic comeback!" I had to start contradicting whatever they said about pedophiles, which led to me making a series of statements that looked like I was defending pedophiles. For example, if they said, "Pedophiles are evil," I would respond by saying, "Pedophilia is involuntary, just like a mental illness or sexual orientation!" because I only cared about one thing: contradicting everything they said, in order to feel like I had "won" the arguement.
Eventually, the conversation somehow turned to the topic of "abolishing the age of consent." This was the first time in the conversation that I actually felt like we had arrived at an intellectually engaging subject. Some people mentally develop at different speeds than other people - this means that one "age of consent" doesn't work for everyone. For example, some people might be mentally developed enough to have sex at age 18, but other people might not be mentally developed enough to make that decision until age 19 or 20. For this reason, the concept of an age of consent is slightly flawed.
It was an interesting hypothetical thought experiment, so I actually put a bit of thought into it. If the age of consent had to be replaced by something else, what would it be replaced with? Instead of selecting an arbitrary number to permit people to have sex, what else could you do? Well, it would be convenient if there was a machine you could place on your head that would scan your brain and determine your current level of mental development. If this machine was 100% accurate, then it would be able to objectively determine whether or not a person is "ready for sex".
The way I phrased this was really stupid; I said something like, "What if there was a sex test, and if you pass it, you get a sex license? Wouldn't that be better than having an age of consent?" This was a stupid explanation, because it completely left out all of the nuance of what I was actually trying to say.
The person I was arguing with was mortified, and asked, "What if a 14-year-old passed the test? Would you permit them to sex?" It was an invalid question, because no 14-year-old could possibly mentally develop fast enough to pass the brain-scan test. It simply would never happen. But, because I was in "Contrarian Mode" and just wanted to contradict everything this person said, I simply responded, "Yeah! If the test is designed to prove something objectively true, then it must be objectively true!" Which has created a false narrative that I think 14-year-olds should be allowed to have sex.
In short, everything I said during that conversation was said purely to be contrarian and contradictory towards my opponent so that I could feel like I was "winning" the arguement. I don't stand by those statements; they are as meaningless as any other statement that you might make in a moment of anger when you're in a heated debate with someone.
After hearing this, my opponent expressed an intention to screenshot the e-mails we'd exchanged, and post the screenshots publicly in order to "expose" me as an evil pedophile. As soon as I was aware that this person was planning to spread bizarre propaganda and smear my name, I wrote a pre-emptive response where I summarized the entire situation so that they couldn't create a false narrative about me.
Unfortunately, ill-meaning individuals cropped my post to create a false narrative that I want to abolish the age of consent and replace it with "sex licenses".
Please don't be gullible enough to be fooled by trolls who take my words out-of-context in an attempt to commit character assassination.
"HERE'S MY 831 WORD LONG ESSAY AS TO WHY IM NOT A PEDOPHILE!!!"
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2020
So let me get this straight, Yandev is incapable of posting to 4Chan because he hasn't figured out what a VPN is?
Oh baby, the long rant about how he was misinterpreted on the "sex licence comment" is pure cope and cringe. He's literally chronicling a play-by-play, like.... who the hell does he think cares about that text wall? He sure does spend a lot of time thinking about putting arguments into his FAQ.
>I never said I was against criticism
>message was cropped to make me look bad
okay fucking lol, not much better since they're talking about someone's friend who got banned for "bold criticism"
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2016
After watching this all the way through, I highly doubt this guy is going to let DrApeis defend himself in the next video. So sadly, we probably won't see a 5 minute sperg out with DrApeis about how Alex is destroying his life.
One of the funniest things I found during Alex's segment was how he tried to justify himself chimping out at Apeis for using his assets and how that's how you would react. This is coming from a guy who wants to start a kickstarter and hire a team to make a product. Alex has once again shown he has no idea how to act professionally, crying to someone that they stole your assets and how it's ruining your life makes you look incredibly unprofessional. (Sure, we know he is unprofessional, but he's still trying to pass himself off as a professional game dev.)
I cannot wait for the next video to see the usual mental gymnastics to say that Alex has changed.
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2020
if you have to write an 831 word essay to ''prove'' to everyone that you're not a pedophile... you're 100% a pedophile that's overcompensating...
if he actually wasn't a pedo, he wouldn't need to go on an autistic tirade.