EVERYONE IS ASEXUAL AND ENBY - [ AND NOBODY IS ]

[The Lawgiver]

would you wear this thot costume?

It looks more like some shit out of jojo or at least thot-appropriation of jojo's weird funny anime guy styles. "safe edgy" stuff appropriating 80s-2000s culture and fashion styles as some people have pointed out the last year or 2.

That is a whore and a slut that gets railed by 5 guys every night.

Probably yeah lmao.

I mean are you really going to dress chaste-like in a Pride celebration of all things?

I mean they used to dress in formal attire way back when. You know, in AMERICA where this stuff started.

 

[2mm and 99 others]

I mean are you really going to dress chaste-like in a Pride celebration of all things?

Well, that woman behind her wouldn't be out of place at a catholic youth convention, if not for the writing on her shirt.

 

[Ampicilina500mg]

Okay, I'm trying to understand asexuality, and it seems stupid to me every time I hear it. I recently had a discussion with a friend about what it means to be asexual; she's a normal, heterosexual woman. But basically, she explained to me that asexuality is valid because asexual people look for someone to share things with, they feel completely in love, and they can live in sexless couples, and that it's a totally different type of relationship than what you'd have with a friend, no matter how much you love them. I understand that no relationship is based solely on sex, and I feel like it's the same, I don't know. In the end, it was a little confusing for me, how she tried to explain how it's not the same, and the conclusion was that we will all eventually become asexual when we're old.

 

[The Lawgiver]

Okay, I'm trying to understand asexuality, and it seems stupid to me every time I hear it. I recently had a discussion with a friend about what it means to be asexual; she's a normal, heterosexual woman. But basically, she explained to me that asexuality is valid because asexual people look for someone to share things with, they feel completely in love, and they can live in sexless couples, and that it's a totally different type of relationship than what you'd have with a friend, no matter how much you love them. I understand that no relationship is based solely on sex, and I feel like it's the same, I don't know. In the end, it was a little confusing for me, how she tried to explain how it's not the same, and the conclusion was that we will all eventually become asexual when we're old.

know this was a necro but I'm just gonna state again Asexual stuff in the label form is genuinely retarded current year-isms at full display most of the time. You don't call being in a loving relationship but not having sex "asexual" you call it having a lover. Only time I've seen the asexual label used in a kinda understandable way was a long term friend of mine referring to himself as that because he's just genuinely not someone seeking really any kind of sex, rather just relationship stuff. That makes sense. All the multi-tier shit where it basically means everything and everything even if you have sex because "oh no see it's totally not sexual attraction motivated and just acey kink!" shit is the current year-ism of asexual and you'll almost always see someone who constantly goes on about their asexuality eventually go down that hole.

So once again...

Tl;DR: No, you (probably) aren't ACTUALLY Asexual or Enby, practically nobody is.
the definition has shifted to encompass everyone much like racism has shifted to exclude those "without power"

 

[Nameless One]

The only true feasible asexuals are celibates or psychopaths and there is no inbetween.