Facebook post, 27 September: Megan.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
TrippinKahlua said:
I wonder what would have happened if Chris did win that Parappa contest. The audience knew Megan wasn't gonna go on the trip with him, how would that have progressed?

He would have become infuriated when she said no to the trip.

random_pickle said:
Holdek said:
Along these lines...dude needlessly ran over a snake on purpose. If that's not malevolent I don't know what is.

Wait, when did this happen?

Sorry, I forget.

Mr. 0 said:
Holdek, it's a fucking snake. How many normal people do you know would give a shit in practice?

That's my point. Most wouldn't give a shit but IIRC Chris purposely turned the wheel to hit the snake, missed, reversed, tried to hit it again, missed, etc. I think he finally killed it on the fourth try or something.
 
Isn't that around the time he ran over his ps3?
 
Male said:
Isn't that around the time he ran over his ps3?

Not sure, but:

"Interesting to note here is that, like the snake he tried to run over, the cardboard box and the Clown Doll, it takes Chris three tries AND a coup de grace the next day just to BREAK DEAD his PS3."

([cwc]The MovingFoward videos[/cwc])
 
Here's something...

Emily said:
So the other day Chris was saying the highlight of his day was running over a snake. Now mind you, he ACTIVELY tried running the snake over. He missed the first time. He missed the second time. Hell, he miss the third time. He finally locked 'old blue' on that snake and hit his target in triumph. When questioned what kind of snake it was he responded that he didn't know but it was poisonous. Now, where Chris was at at the time, there are no poisonous snakes in that area. So in reality it was most likely a black snake or a garter snake.

He was PROUD of running over that snake.

(http://www.sonichu.com/cwcki/User:James_Lamp-Eye/Collection#Info_from_Emil)
 
[cwc=Mailbag_23#Chris_the_sociopath]Here.[/cwc] I really don't see how it's a big deal, though.
 
CompyRex said:
I really don't see how it's a big deal, though.

^Links to "Chris the sociopath"
 
Holdek said:
CompyRex said:
I really don't see how it's a big deal, though.

^Links to "Chris the sociopath"

I'll spell it out for you.

Chris,

How are you dealing with the recent heavy snowfall? Since you have many symptoms of Antisocial Personality Disorder (which you can read all about on Wikipedia) like lack of empathy and remorse, lack of any realistic future goals, criminal behavior (like stealing your parents credit cards to buy video games), an inability to keep jobs, an inability to keep friends and maintain relationships, Narcissism, your persistent attitude of irresponsibility and disregard for social rules, obligations, and norms, and cruelty to animals (remember that snake you intentionally ran over this summer?) I hope you don't chop up your family in a fit of rage or anything.

You shouldn't hold your cat like that either, she doesn't sound like she wants to be picked up.

Oh, and why are you advising people to date women that remind them of their moms? That's pretty sick.

Happy Holidays,

Sean August Watley
 
Holdek said:
She has a good case. I would go to law school on my own dime, take the bar in Virginia, and sue Chris pro bono for her just for the lulz.

I still very much doubt she'd go through with it though because, contrary to what Chris thinks, she doesn't want to hurt him.
 
I was just kind of thinking of the moral ambiguity of taking advantage of someone who is clearly mentally handicapped (Chris) for financial or personal gain. Whether Megan was intentionally taking advantage of him or not, everything he talks about in his post just kind of shows (to me at least) that Chris should have had a handler to keep all of his finances and valuables in check for the entirety of his adult life.
 
^Nah, not Megan. Seriously, he could've said no at any time, and if his past behavior is any indication, it seems like he was pretty aggressive about his gift-giving. Honestly, I wouldn't be surprised if she was accepting his gifts out of fear of insulting him. Moreover, seeing as how Chris has a pretty standard entitled nice guy\loveshy mentality, it's not like he ever meant to do anything other than use these 'gifts' to 'buy' her into being his girlfriend
 
Holdek said:
Along these lines... dude Chris needlessly ran over a snake on purpose. If that's not malevolent I don't know what is.
Edited to avoid confusion with any other dudes who may be present.

Giving the devil his due, some people are freaked out by snakes, and Chris is hardly bright enough to identify a harmless snake from a venomous one, so he may not have realized it was needless. So running over that snake may well not have qualified as properly malevolent.

But malevolent or not, it was really REALLY fucking cowardly. I mean who the hell needs a van to dispatch even a venomous snake that was probably completely torpid and only on the pavement to try to get a little heat into its sluggish, ectothermic body?

Butta Face Lopez said:
I have a pet snake, which, according to some people, apparently, makes it a person.
It's more of a person than a pet rock but less a person than a pet dog. We've been over this.

Now we only have to determine where OPL sits on the sliding scale of personhood.
 
Dammit, now the snake incident has made me want to see a new season of Animal Face Off, only this season have everything versus Chris: Deinosuchus vs. Chris… Titanoboa vs. Chris… Dugong vs. Chris… Kiwi vs. Chris… Thousands of Naked Mole Rats vs. Chris…

I mean who wouldn't want to see a scientifically accurate virtual Chris get his ass whupped by… well… virtual everything once a week?
 
A-№1 said:
Butta Face Lopez said:
I have a pet snake, which, according to some people, apparently, makes it a person.
It's more of a person than a pet rock but less a person than a pet dog. We've been over this.

Now we only have to determine where OPL sits on the sliding scale of personhood.

OPL ranks below everything. :alog:
 
A-№1 said:
Butta Face Lopez said:
I have a pet snake, which, according to some people, apparently, makes it a person.
It's more of a person than a pet rock but less a person than a pet dog. We've been over this.
It thought, it felt, it didn't want to die, and died in pain. Really, isn't that enough?
 
Dr RobotDick said:
I feel like I'm knit-picking something that would probably never happen anyway, but dealing with process servers is a bulk of my job. VA has no certification requirements for process servers. Anyone over 18 that doesn't have a vested interest in the case can serve papers. I've had guys serve people in a bathing suit and flip-flops and it still counted as good service. While the attorney probably wouldn't want his business associated with a dude in a pickle suit, as long as the person was over 18, I think it would be legally acceptable.
Legally acceptable is not the same thing as presenting a favorable impression to the courts.

Everything you say is true, but I specifically mention going through the local sheriff for a number of reasons: I believe Megan is out of state or at least out of the county (I really don't know because who cares about Megan's private life?) and unless her attorney already has a local agency they use, the sheriff's office is a common go to for process serving. The sheriff's office will most likely pass it on to one of their own flock of available servers unless they have a reason to believe Chris might react violently (so give them that reason). We know Chris will not take being served with a protection order or C&D well, but being served by a uniformed deputy might help convince him to behave himself anyways. And if Chris takes it in his own charming psychotic manner, a deputy is exactly the sort process server we want present to witness and handle his inevitable tardrage tantrum.

tl;dr: Being served by a uniformed jerkop will result in much more tardrage and crapped briefs than even a man in a pickle suit.
 
A-№1 said:
Dammit, now the snake incident has made me want to see a new season of Animal Face Off, only this season have everything versus Chris: Deinosuchus vs. Chris… Titanoboa vs. Chris… Dugong vs. Chris… Kiwi vs. Chris… Thousands of Naked Mole Rats vs. Chris…

I mean who wouldn't want to see a scientifically accurate virtual Chris get his ass whupped by… well… virtual everything once a week?

Now I really want to see someone build a Chris robot. Is Battle Bots still around?
 
A-№1 said:
Butta Face Lopez said:
I have a pet snake, which, according to some people, apparently, makes it a person.
It's more of a person than a pet rock but less a person than a pet dog. We've been over this.

If animals have "personhood," and they don't, why is my pet less a person than a dog? Because some people find it icky and gross?

Some people find gay people icky and gross, are they lesser people?

Who are like...any of us to start putting ranks on what is a more valuable life than another?

He deliberately killed a living thing; not to eat, not to use in any fashion...but because it was "only a snake," or whatever, the intent and the effect are somehow lessened?

"We've been over this." Please. Like this silly weirdness is some sort of simple, everyday fact of life where everybody is supposed to just simply know, somehow, the arbitrarily decided upon, and I'm sure inctedibly different from person to person, hierarchy of the value of life.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom