Banks are basically run by the government. If it were possible to run your own bank, I would agree with you, but they are way too regulated. It is not feasible to start Kiwi Financial Services, LLC.
This is why they have to be regulated, and why bringing the competition free is not possible. The banks would still be able to collect shekels, but they'd have to do so for everyone equally.
No. You can accept fiat payments, and instantly convert to Bitcoin.
With deregulation, you could just have normal, direct payment systems. Most non-American countries already have such instant direct bank transfers, even in Africa (M-pesa).
careerlancer.net
It isn't. Banking is heavily regulated. Even if credit unions were totally unregulated, how would you get correspondent accounts?Starting a Credit Union – What Do You Need to Know
There are not many credit unions around. In fact, not even one has formed in the recent past. So, if you are planning to start a credit union, then you have got
Seems pretty simple to get started to me . . .
Either one is fine. Either you totally regulate them and have them follow the same standards as the government (OK), or you totally deregulate them, so anyone can start one. No half measures.
Which monopoly money? If the dollar crashes, you can still trade Bitcoins for CNY, and so on.
If you have a total societal collapse, you have a total societal collapse. This is vacuously true. If the Internet vanishes, you will not be able to access this website either.
We could have that right now. We don't. The federal government is supposedly working on an IBAN style direct transfer system to be ready by 2024, but we'll still have payment processors.
China Joe and the establishment are owned by the Kikes. Nothing is changing.
wow what a bold and original take.
Name one time more government ever actually improved things for the citizenry.
Name one time a bank did, retard fag.
Name one time anarchy hasn't been so shit people immediately formed a pseudo government the first chance they got.
Government is a necessary evil for a functioning society. However, it must be opposed and challenged at every turn lest it turn into byzantine bureaucracy that accomplishes nothing except it's own enrichment. The issue isn't the existence of government, but morons expecting government to solve problems for them.
Implemented racial segeregation.
Thank you for explaining how sometimes more government helped people.
Actually name an example. The presence of government itself doesn't inherently make things better.
Allowing multiple races to co-exist within the same region eventually resulted in integration and regression as the people ceased moving forward and began acting like cavemen bickering for the benefit of their specific tribe.
You did, getting rid of anarchy, which simply entails creating laws and regulations on what people can an cannot do to eachother (for example outlawing rape, murder and theft) and then enforcing these laws and regulations.
That isn't a net positive. Government only breaks even when enacting laws. Lawmakers must be paid, and this requires the extraction of sweat and treasure from the population, thereby leaving them with less than the fruits of their labor. This does not make people's lives better. Once people start refusing to follow the demands of government, the judicial branch is formed, requiring the forcible surrender of more treasure from the people. All government ever does is slow down the pace at which things become worse. It never makes them better.
It literally does make it better. Anarchy is a worse state than 99% of societies with a state. You add government to anarchy it gets better.
The government is simply me outsourcing the protection of my rights. If you don't consent to outsourcing the protection of your rights to the same government, thats great! You can immigrate to a different country with a government you like then. If you can't find a government you like, start your own country.
