- Joined
- Nov 9, 2024
I mean, content wise, the F3 DLC's are "better". Story wise, not so much, if they even have any....Now that's one of the most batshit thing i have ever heard.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I mean, content wise, the F3 DLC's are "better". Story wise, not so much, if they even have any....Now that's one of the most batshit thing i have ever heard.
If you're looking for good end game Energy Weapons, there is a few I can think of, depending on what you're looking for:I'm going Energy Weapons, with Guns as backup because I've found myself going for stretches without easy access to cells. I was regretting taking the trait where you shoot faster at the cost of 20% accuracy, but it turns out Gunslinger and Commando (at least mostly) nullify that disadvantage.
Currently rocking Joshua Graham's armor, but I was wearing the NCR patrol armor for a while since I don't think my character's going to support the Legion (found Boone easy enough and was disgusted after finding the bill of sale for his wife and unborn child).
Speaking of, is it me or are most of the traits either ridiculously situational or just plain drawbacks with little to make up for them? Very few of them looked worthwhile to take at all.
Isn't this like the 5th multi hour long video this faggot has done? How many more times are nasally voices faggots going to whinge about this retarded game. What could possibly be left to talk about?
"Apocalyptically Awful" is hyperbolic to say the least. I can understand not liking the writing or world building, but Fallout 3 has its redeeming qualities.
Some people actually have something to talk about. Others simply whine because they're proven wrong time and time again, but I guess you would know what's like, huh?Isn't this like the 5th multi hour long video this faggot has done? How many more times are nasally voices faggots going to whinge about this retarded game. What could possibly be left to talk about?

True, but none of these have to do with it's writing."Apocalyptically Awful" is hyperbolic to say the least. I can understand not liking the writing or world building, but Fallout 3 has its redeeming qualities.
How can you call Fallout 3 world building awful when you defended the worst example of the game. Little Lamplight?True, but none of these have to do with it's writing.
Offer is still open if anyone wants to actually discuss the awful Fallout 3 worldbuilding, but I guess if my longer posts like these ones make some people shut their brains off and drool on the floor, I guess there isn't much chance of that happening.
That one actually isn't too bad: The fungus explains their food, they have water, and due to their self sufficient nature the kids can take care of themselves out in the wasteland. Their cave is well hidden away to protect them from dangers, but then again, if Paradise Falls knows where they're from(since they send a slaver to wait outside when you kidnap that little girl), why didn't they just storm the town and get all the kids? I guess you could say this for every small "settlement" like this, there is no answer because Fallout 3 is Oblivion with guns.
I think it was supposed to be a compiled remake of his other non-response FO3 videos but I didn't watch it to find out.Isn't this like the 5th multi hour long video this faggot has done?
If I explained it away, it's not the worst one, now is it?How can you call Fallout 3 world building awful when you defended the worst example of the game. Little Lamplight?
Imagine defending overly wordy (pot calling the kettle a nigger but whatever) pretentious faggots just because they also dislike the game you dislike
Feel free to prove me wrong and take any of these hour+ videos and divide them into bulletpoints, debunking any point you might not agree with. You won't, cause you don't have an attention span for an hour long video, let alone to make a counter argument to anything he says.I guess when several paragraph long forum posts give you a migraine, there is no way you can make anything longer than a 20 minute ADHD youtube video that says nothing at best, where as someone who knows what they're talking about and know how to formulate their video can easily make a 9 hour video. Or a 21 hour one if we're talking about a game with as many problems as Skyrim, for example.
I will continue to take 30 seconds to type out my responses so i can get shit that took longer than a minute to write XOXOXOIf I explained it away, it's not the worst one, now is it?
There is plenty of examples of bad writing and wordbuilding in Fallout 3, for how annoying the kids in Little Lamplight are at least whoever designed the location made an effort to explain how it works. Breathe it in, cause this is about the best written "city" in the game, lmfao. Also about the only one that explains the question "what do they eat", funnily enough.
Feel free to prove me wrong and take any of these hour+ videos and divide them into bulletpoints, debunking any point you might not agree with. You won't, cause you don't have an attention span for an hour long video, let alone to make a counter argument to anything he says.
Key difference between tourists/bethesda fans vs actual fans of the franchise. Or it could be just the same dummies arguing there is "too much text in RPGs", either way they don't deserve to be taken seriously or have any responses made to them that are less than 40 minutes long(they won't respond because they have a good comeback, but because watching something for 40 minutes straight is herculean task for them).
>Do this incredibly tedious and obnoxious task to prove you are as smart as ME!Feel free to prove me wrong and take any of these hour+ videos and divide them into bulletpoints, debunking any point you might not agree with. You won't, cause you don't have an attention span for an hour long video
I will continue to take 30 seconds to type out my responses so i can get shit that took longer than a minute to write XOXOXO
Well, you know what they say: If you have nothing good to say, at least admit to it!>Do this incredibly tedious and obnoxious task to prove you are as smart as ME!
No, I don't think I will. I will just call you a niggerfaggot instead.
Evidently. You should practice getting some bitches on your bone-dry dick rather than going on autistic 40+ paragraph rants, saying the same shit everyone just like you says, about a dead game franchise with two whole decent games in it.I need the practice.
The premise was good. The execution was super not. The idea of entering this jingoist VR propaganda game about the battle of Anchorage, made during the war, was really cool. But it should have been, like, a really cool cheesy war movie parody. The DLC flirts with elements of this but doesn't really take it anywhere fun.Operation: Anchorage was good
I checked, he has made 18 fallout videos that either reach or pass the 1 hour mark. 9 of those were about the Fallout show alone. I didn't like the Fallout show, but how the fuck do you find enough stuff to complain about to make a combined total of over 24 hours of content? I'm not even going to bother doing the math on how long he talked about Fallout 4 and 3, but for comparison:Isn't this like the 5th multi hour long video this faggot has done? How many more times are nasally voices faggots going to whinge about this retarded game. What could possibly be left to talk about?


"Two whole decent games"Evidently. You should practice getting some bitches on your bone-dry dick rather than going on autistic 40+ paragraph rants, saying the same shit everyone just like you says, about a dead game franchise with two whole decent games in it.
The thing is that none of the 5 DLCs are bad. Problem here is that with only two of them being narratively focused(and I use that term lightly, by Fallout 3 standards), that leaves 3 of them and a good portion of these two as well, being combat focused. Combat in Fallout 3 is garbage, so how much you will like these DLCs is entirely up to how much of Fallout 3's Oblivion ass fighting you can tolerate. If that's your thing, then yeah, you will love them, probably every single one of them. For most players that already experienced them, tho, they will likely only dip in if there is a weapon or armor set they like using within that DLC. Not the worst set of DLCs I have seen in gaming, not even that generation, but they definitely border on "just being there". Only Broken Steel is necessary since it fixes problems with the main game and adds extra levels, both of which make the base game borderline unplayable past a certain point. None of them really stand out, even Point Lookout is hilariously unfinished and lacking in planned content once you look into it's development history and cut content.Operation: Anchorage was good
Dust did the same thing with perks, with almost all of them having downsides that ruined them and railroaded you into one single gameplay style. Which would be fine if Dust didn't make ammo super rare and made guns so fragile they break after 100 shots, forcing you to use whatever it gives you.Good Natured is arguably the best. You essentially gain more points than you lose. Most people aren't going to use every weapon type in the game so you're really only losing 5-10 points that you would benefit from having while gaining points in skills that you will use the entire game.
Hoarder I forget how it works. isn't it just free carry weight as long as you're carrying something? I think if you've got the repair skill the one that causes increased weapon decay is okay as well? The issue with traits is that it's a first person game and you're not really going to have many options to make the traits meaningful like you would in a CRPG, since most of the combat gameplay. I recently played ATOM RPG and Trudograd and found myself roleplaying as the addicted medic. It was a neat trait in the first game that made you more likely to be addicted but gave you increased medicine. Took it as a roleplay chance and just made my character try to be very adverse to drugs (like a struggling addict). Second game pooed on that quite a bit. They made the perk much better but you essentially *had* to use drugs to make it work. I think it was bonus crit chance while chemmed up, but you were constantly addicted so you had to be using nonstop. Killed the roleplay i had from the first game.
Most games with traits run into the issue of most of them being extremely tedious or unfun for gameplay purposes, and the only reason to pick them is roleplay or extra challenges.
Double posting but OA was fun if you can glitch the armors and have unbreakable gear early on.Operation: Anchorage was good
The Combat Armor with Balaclava along with winterized unbreakable guns(most have unique skins) used to be my favorite kit in the game. Or, you can run around with the Winterized Power Armor and Winterized Combat Helmet(the one with the balaclava), looks sick.Double posting but OA was fun if you can glitch the armors and have unbreakable gear early on.
And also, I love the moral choices in the Pitt over the rug pull bullshit in Honest Hearts.
The only choice is to eat the baby btw
Fallout 1 and New Vegas actually. All the other good games are in Russian. All the crying you do and you haven't even been able to comprehend that I don't even really like 3 all that much. It has some decent elements, but the gameplay is so ass that unless you play it via TTW it's hardly worth the hassle. But keep constructing Strawmen, maybe NMA would be more your speed faglord.Let me guess, Fallout 3 and New Vegas?
Creetosis is one of the prime examples of YouTube essay guy whose grift is that he can whine for hours at a time about one topic and say virtually nothing of substance at all. Its autistic brain food for people who want background noise that's vaguely negative and reinforces their own opinions.9 of those were about the Fallout show alone. I didn't like the Fallout show, but how the fuck do you find enough stuff to complain about to make a combined total of over 24 hours of content