Feb 28, 2022 - Chris transferred to another facility

Status
Not open for further replies.
I've said this before to other replies, but Chris does not need to 'know the law.' The courts require a much, much lower standard for competency where Chris simply understands where he is, what the charges say he did, what the consequences may be, and that the defense attorney is on his side and he should listen. The strong majority of those facing charges in any court probably think that Judge Judy or My Cousin Vinny are good approximations of an actual court. That understanding really is entirely sufficient for the courts to consider you competent to stand trial; you know a basically accurate answer to the question "what is going on?" and your attorney or a public defender can set you straight from there.

I'm only slightly joking when I say that the Sonichu issue with the trial against the Trolls shows sufficient understanding to be deemed competent. It's obviously ludicrous in the details and outcome, but it does indeed show that Chris, at the time of drawing it, understood what a court is, what charges and guilt are, and other broad strokes like that. That's all that the average person knows about courts too. Before this saga began, who here (besides the few generous legal-kiwis who have shared their insight) had any more sophisticated understanding of court proceedings beyond what they saw on Better Call Saul? That level of understanding is all the court expects.

My point is that this is an extremely low bar to meet and Chris has successfully passed it twice before. Chris is at a much worse place mentally than in the Classic Chris days.

The alternative is that Chris is just so lost in fantasy that cooperation with Heilberg is impossible, which is also a massive deterioration in ability to function. If someone knows more about the law or mental health than I do, please correct me, but I think that we don't yet appreciate yet how significant this hospitalization is.
My guess would be that you're more or less in the right direction, though I think the issue might be that his, um, "flights of fancy", might just be making it difficult to ascertain whether he understands or not. Basically, it may be that he does understand the situation, but is communicating so poorly that they don't know for sure.
 
That was ruled unconstitutional last year.
That's only as a sentencing, if you mean Packingham, which I'm pretty sure you do since it's been discussed possibly even by you. This was longer than a year ago, though the Supreme Court's wording on it makes it clear it isn't striking down any conceivable statute that restricts Internet access to certain classes of offenders, but that Internet access is a First Amendment right and therefore subject to strict scrutiny.

They have to give an actual reason. For instance, the act involved a computer, a child, Internet or telephone contact, or had some nexus with the need for the restriction. The North Carolina statute struck down in Packingham was exceedingly broad.

Cases by lower courts following Packingham have distinguished the statutes at issue in their respective states from those in Packingham.

But if we're talking release conditions, agreed to to get out of jail, you can agree to anything you want to.

To actually sentence you to such a restriction, though, requires you actually have done something that restricting your Internet activity protects the public. Unfortunately for Chris it only protects himself, so they probably won't.
 
My guess would be that you're more or less in the right direction, though I think the issue might be that his, um, "flights of fancy", might just be making it difficult to ascertain whether he understands or not. Basically, it may be that he does understand the situation, but is communicating so poorly that they don't know for sure.
That's a good point. I would still argue that shows a significant decline relative to Chris's past ability to function. I'd love to hear someone with more knowledge than me share their opinion on the matter. There's enough documents out there to give a clear picture of comprehension and ability to cooperate requirements, but is there a threshold where the defendant is basically just too weird to tell like you propose?

I would guess that the bar is just that your relationships with fantasies supersede your relationships to your attorney or the court.; which is quite far. Not to be some sort of middle-school atheist, but courts deal with hundreds of defendants claiming that God will directly intervene and prove their innocence or set them free; in purely legal terms, how is believing Sonichu will save you that much different?
 
"We find, on this record, the conditions banning legal pornography and internet access cannot be sustained as “reasonably related” under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(d)(1) and are overbroad under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(d)(2). We reverse."
That was regarding the specific conditions in this case, not all conceivable restrictions.

Screenshot 2022-03-09 211846.png

The trial court can't simply do that without any reasoning. There is a compelling government interest in protecting the public from the peculiar evil of sex offenders but an outright ban is hardly the narrowest possible way to carry it out. The "entering any location where it may be accessed" is especially ridiculous.

In theory that could mean he couldn't go to a bus station with a newspaper stand in it that sold smut without risking more prison.
 
That is amazing, but I would say the interesting part is that Chris no longer understands the legal system. The previous two times were no issue, but the situation has deteriorated to the point that they can't proceed.
He had his mother assisting him those other times. (Along with at least one other person, according to reporter kiwis at the macing hearings). But you’re right, he’s worse.

Chris would rather work than have no internet.
If I wasn’t saving all my C-quarters for leftover autism coins, I would bet you’re wrong.

Hey does anyone know what the deal with Chris trying to escape from jail? I remember seeing a video a while ago of Chris without his pants running away from the cops and getting tazed. Does anyone know if that is real or what the backstory to it is? Thanks and God bless.
It’s definitely fake.
 
more like, "i'm not the center of the universe. when i'm not around everyone else still exists independently of me observing it."

chris never got there, and i believe it's why he thinks he's special beyond regular megalomania.

He's not that bad, he understands object permanence. He knows someone could be plotting in the shadows (even if he's always wrong about what's happening and usually who is responsible). He knows things happen and people are doing things even when he doesn't see them. I'm not exactly sure when he gained object permanence, but it's one of the first mental skills small children acquire, so it's not a tall hurdle for him to have it, even if he might have gotten it later in life that most children.

What he can't understand is that other people observe the world differently than he does. Chris knows he doesn't know about everything that's happening in reality, but when he *does* see something he assumes that what he observes, and more importantly how he rationalizes it, is the status of reality.

If he decides that someone is being mean, they're being mean. It doesn't matter what the other person is thinking. If someone disagrees with him, they are either being mean or they are misinformed (because Chris can't fathom his own observations being wrong). If Chris decides that a talking bear is actually God speaking to him, that is reality.

Chris can still change his mind though, and then reality shifts. I strongly suspect that's why Chris can cope himself into fantasies so easily.
 
more like, "i'm not the center of the universe. when i'm not around everyone else still exists independently of me observing it."

chris never got there, and i believe it's why he thinks he's special beyond regular megalomania.
I theorized years ago on this board that Chris may be a believer in solipsism
However I don't believe he actually knows what a solipsist is
 
Last edited:
If anyone wonders what release would look like for Chris, I'd recommend looking at what happened to Lorne Armstrong after his eventual release (from prison after a TCAP sting).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hongourable Madisha
I am surprised that he was even capable of learning how to read.
He can drive (sort of) and use technology like video games and computers (with mixed results).

Chris can function more or less like an average person in day-to-day things, it's just when you look get beyond tying a shoe lace he needs help.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back