How does streaming cost that much? Did those retards not check multiple options and compare prices?
First, he's using Google. Cloud services like AWS, Google, and others are insanely, prohibitively expensive except to truly profitable enterprises.
Second, he is paying them for video processing. GPU processing is very, very expensive because GPU datacenters are currently being rented by ML projects in Academia, Government, and Big Tech itself. He's just trying to render retards sleeping at 1080/720/480p for web and mobile viewing, but he's bidding against the most powerful entities in the world for the processing to do so.
Third, bandwidth is expensive and videos use a lot of bandwidth. Metokur's biggest stream had 25,000 concurrent viewers. I've broken down the math elsewhere, but here you go:
- 1080p30fps is about 8Mbps (mebibit).
- Multiple 8 by 25 000 and divide by 1024 and you get 195Gbps
- That's is two 100Gbps (gibibit) lines.
- Bandwidth comes in two flavors: Dedicated (flat) and usage-based (CDR).
- A 10Gbps dedicated line at my locations is usually about $750/mo. So multiply that by 20 and you get $15,000 a month for bandwidth - but in reality I think you get $8~$10 000 for being a big customer buying in bulk.
Not factored in is hardware. You'll need a server with a 2x100Gbps network card, such as
this for $1300. If you're doing your video processing yourself, you'll need the software to manage it and graphics cards in the dedicated server. Then you'll also need a place to put it that isn't going to kick you off. You'll also probably need a router capable of processing 200Gbps and the billions of packets per second going through such a network, and that is a very big price in and of itself.
This is why streaming startup competitors to YouTube always fail. YouTube has Google money to keep it solvent no matter what and what they offer
for free is unbeatable by a DIY setup without serious investment capital.