Five Nights at Freddy's Community - A Community full of autistic faggots who sperg and get into controversy / drama 24/7, is full of creeps / pedophiles, and can be political at times

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
I forget the exact canonical motivations of William Afton but it’s something of a combination of “grieving father” and “mad scientist” which obviously isn’t exactly realistic.
The series hasn't really answered that, probably because Scott Cawthon knows what you do (the part about kid murderers usually being pedophiles.) Even the movie didn't answer that. The closest we have to an explanation is a vague combination between satanic ritual and adrenochrome Pizzagate stuff.
The dude even had to make a response explaining how making FNaF more like traditional horror media does not necessarily make someone a weird creep. There's some things about missing the "point" of the franchise and how subtle you can make it but this is not what I'm here to discuss.
I don't disagree that horror nowadays leans too heavily on shocking viscera rather than actual tension, dread or horror. I also don't believe including those things in a story makes the author a creep. But the series itself has always avoided overt on-screen torture of anybody, even the series' most gory canonical moment was shot in a way more reminiscent of Psycho (obviously violence is happening but you don't see it), changing that makes it more generic and less artful. I have to hand Freddy's autistic fanbase the W this time.
 
You do it by pressing this button.
Screenshot 2024-07-26 at 09-35-39 Five Nights at Freddy[...].png
 
Obviously the lore for FNaF is infamously convoluted but iirc only some of the animatronics are possessed by dead kids. For example my understanding is the the toy animatronics were reprogrammed by the spirits into being hostile rather than being directly controlled.
The ones that aren't possessed so far are the toys, like you said, the Glamrocks, which are basically fully sentient but were hacked into, the phantoms, which are hallucinations, and debatably the nightmares, which are also hallucinations but this time caused by gas.

The main lines (first game), scrapped versions, and fun times are haunted.

I could go into more details about who is and isn't haunted but we'd be here all day.
 
I recall of an obscure book author who once made a video dedicated to rewriting Security Breach in a way that he found to be fitting. It was a good video as it is but the major problem people had with it was the fact that the comic book visuals had a fair bit of gore in it. There may have been no pedo implications but you can guess how well the broader FNaF community took the video and its colorful visuals. The comment section will give it away if you look in there.

The rewritten narrative starts at the 13:37 mark.

The dude even had to make a response explaining how making FNaF more like traditional horror media does not necessarily make someone a weird creep. There's some things about missing the "point" of the franchise and how subtle you can make it but this is not what I'm here to discuss. The video can be found here for those curious enough.
>Is a fan of game where a guy kills kids
>Person re-writes Security Breach's story
>Have some gore
>FNAF Fans: "That is too far, there is too much gore in this story"


I can't man. :story:
Screen Shot 2024-07-26 at 09.52.19.png

Screen Shot 2024-07-26 at 09.53.25.png
Screen Shot 2024-07-26 at 09.53.44.png
 
The ones that aren't possessed so far are the toys, like you said, the Glamrocks, which are basically fully sentient but were hacked into, the phantoms, which are hallucinations, and debatably the nightmares, which are also hallucinations but this time caused by gas.

The main lines (first game), scrapped versions, and fun times are haunted.

I could go into more details about who is and isn't haunted but we'd be here all day.
Luckily for furries the glamrock and the toy animatronics seem to be the most popular ones for them to jerk off to lol
 
I don't disagree that horror nowadays leans too heavily on shocking viscera rather than actual tension, dread or horror. I also don't believe including those things in a story makes the author a creep. But the series itself has always avoided overt on-screen torture of anybody, even the series' most gory canonical moment was shot in a way more reminiscent of Psycho (obviously violence is happening but you don't see it), changing that makes it more generic and less artful. I have to hand Freddy's autistic fanbase the W this time.
I don't know, honestly. Like any story telling device, you can only use it sparingly in order to leave an impact that doesn't come off as an abused gimmick. It may be possible to implement gore in a way that it doesn't scare away the more sensitive and doesn't involve Atari graphics, but FNaF isn't that type of series to directly show you anyways so I'm conflicted on the whole idea. Especially when most of the fanbase cannot be any older than 17.

Perhaps I'm too used to seeing graphic things happen so my perspective is somewhat skewed. At least the movie did leave me satisfied in that intruder scene.
>Is a fan of game where a guy kills kids
>Person re-writes Security Breach's story
>Have some gore
>FNAF Fans: "That is too far, there is too much gore in this story"


I can't man. :story:
There's nothing else to expect from a franchise that is known to abuse subtlety to excuse the lack of efficient writing and gameplay. The gore would be the least of my worries as there is more undercooked and unexplained content found within both the games and the anthology book series. The Frights and Tales in particular are a completely different rabbit hole to jump into if you're looking to find Goosebumps tier stories, and those stories get real graphic at times.
 
Last edited:
@Alien Farmer great OP but I’m surprised that there is no mention of the sperg who made the Return to Freddy’s series. He’s the closest thing the FNaF community has to an old school lolcow:

This video covers a lot of the shit with him.
Okay I've added it the OP. I tried to explain about what I know about so far. I wrote a short run down about and it and linked the video that you've linked as well as archiving it in case people want to learn more about it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Seafarer
One thing's for sure, FNaF fans love their merchandise. I never understood the appeal of being an adult and buying plushies, but this fandom takes the cake in just how many they usually own.

You can't make this shit up.

View attachment 6236630
I swear this dude looks like that retard that cried at a star wars trailer, shitty moles and everything.
Do they make these retards in a lab or something?
 
Luckily for furries the glamrock and the toy animatronics seem to be the most popular ones for them to jerk off to lol
I think I've said this before but I'm still fucking shocked that Scott signed off on the Freddy in Space/Fury's Rage designs (Looking at the wiki, it's PinkyPills's fault).
Those things are goonertastic.
NextYear_Teaser.jpg
 
I think I've said this before but I'm still fucking shocked that Scott signed off on the Freddy in Space/Fury's Rage designs (Looking at the wiki, it's PinkyPills's fault).
Those things are goonertastic.
View attachment 6237649
Scott absolutely knew what he was doing when he came up with the Roxanne Wolf character. He knows that horny furries are some of the best paypigs out there.
 
Scott absolutely knew what he was doing when he came up with the Roxanne Wolf character. He knows that horny furries are some of the best paypigs out there.
That actually brings up an interesting question. I always assumed that the glamrock designs were created by Steel Wool but I can't actually find confirmation on who was responsible.
 
Okay I've added it the OP. I tried to explain about what I know about so far. I wrote a short run down about and it and linked the video that you've linked as well as archiving it in case people want to learn more about it.
Good work, but I think there should be a mention of the “super cancer” and a character being killed by slipping on a bar of soap into a springlock suit since those are the most meme-worthy moments when it comes to BFB’s shitty writing.
 
Last edited:
That actually brings up an interesting question. I always assumed that the glamrock designs were created by Steel Wool but I can't actually find confirmation on who was responsible.
I swear I remember someone in the FNaF multimedia thread mentioning that Scott came up with Roxanne but that could be wrong.
 
Last edited:
Good work, but I think there should be a mention of the “super cancer” and a character being killed by slipping on a bar of soap into a springlock suit since those are the most meme-worthy moments when it comes to BFB’s shitty writing.
Did it.

Added the clip of minaxa explaining the soap part.

Added the whole super cancer thing when I explain that he made some novels.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Seafarer
Back