Five Nights At Freddy's

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
It was mostly just watching the retarded game theory videos, but outing the series maker very much killed any interest I had in the series.
 
How's that a bad thing you kid diddler? He banned troons from service so it to not rot completely, unfortunately it's too late to get rid of fags from there.
And yes I speak of that as a foreign citizen, although even I understand the right steps in such policies, Donnie wanted army to be strong, not crippled rotting mess because of inclusivity and shit. How's that a bad thing?!

Again, a right decition to make.

So you want US army to be sassy cuckolds full of combat incompatible troons? Aight, fair enough, OI FELLAS, IT'S TIME TO BRING OUR OWN DEMOCRACY INTO US. AT AWAY!

Please consider committing the suicide soon, you're insufferable retarded victim of failed abortion process, I don't appreciate your existence here simply because you ruin good\decent threads with your worthless pedophile opinion. I'm sure many of people there don't appreciate your existence here, for all the same reasons.
 
I don't think you read the article. See below with parts I bolded to show this is a little fishy to take at face value.

A new advocacy group report backed by the former surgeons general of the Army and Navy, asserts that the military's effective ban on transgender service is eroding readiness, lending support to President-elect Joe Biden's campaign pledge to end the restriction.

"The ban undermines recruitment by artificially shrinking a recruiting pool comprising an estimated 205,850 transgender Americans of recruiting age [and] by discouraging transgender and gender-non-conforming individuals from considering service," according to the 36-page study by the Palm Center, which does research on gender, sexuality and the military. The report was released Nov. 22.

The ban also has an impact on retention "by stigmatizing and uniquely burdening transgender personnel, making them less likely to continue or extend their service," the report states. "The ban's overall impact has been to undermine readiness by blocking or discouraging many transgender individuals from serving or deploying, uniquely burdening transgender service, and stigmatizing transgender individuals as a threat to the military mission."

The report's six authors include retired Vice Adm. Donald C. Arthur, former surgeon general of the Navy, and retired Maj. Gen. Gale Pollock, former acting surgeon general of the Army.

Once he is inaugurated on Jan. 20, Biden will have authority to reverse President Donald Trump's executive order imposing the ban; he pledged to do so in a campaign position paper.

On the Transgender Day of Remembrance last Friday, Biden also pledged to eliminate discrimination against transgender Americans.

"To transgender and gender-nonconforming people across America and around the world -- from the moment I am sworn in as president of the United States, know that my administration will see you, listen to you, and fight for not only your safety but also the dignity and justice you have been denied," Biden said in a statement.

The Obama administration took action in June 2016 to allow transgender Americans to serve openly in the military.

But in a July 2017 series of tweets, Trump put the ban in place, saying, "After consultation with my Generals and military experts, please be advised that the United States Government will not accept or allow transgender individuals to serve in any capacity in the U.S. Military."

Although Trump said he had consulted with the military, the Pentagon at the time appeared to have been blindsided by the announcement. Pentagon officials could not respond to questions on how the ban would affect transgender individuals already serving.

Trump directed then-Defense Secretary Jim Mattis to plan for implementation. In April 2019, the Defense Department issued regulations "prohibiting transgender individuals, with some exceptions, from serving in the military, citing the financial costs of inclusive service, as well as a threat to readiness, cohesion, and lethality," the Palm Center said in the report.

The report estimates that there are currently about 15,000 transgender U.S. service members. Under the Trump administration's policy, they can continue serving if they do so in the gender they were assigned at birth, unless they are granted a waiver.

The Palm Center report was based on public statements made by senior officials, in-depth interviews with transgender service members, survey data and interviews with faculty at the service academies.

A former Navy aviation electronics technician cited anonymously in the report said the effective ban made him leave the service when his obligation ended.

"I separated in large part due to the treatment of myself and other trans troops,"he said. "I could not justify putting my life on hold to [support] an organization that in an official capacity says that people like me are a burden to the service and that continually mistreated me on the basis of being trans."

The jist of it is a new advocacy group is upset that transgenders couldn't serve and solely used the shrinking of the pool able bodied civilians that would be eligible to serve if needed. This overlooks the mental health issues these people may have if they join up. The fact that they only used the diminished recruiting pool rationale may have been the only way to get two former surgeon generals of the military to sign off (General Gale Pollock was not a physician, she was a nurse).

The military makes these decisions all the time, they practically banned anyone with an IQ under 83 from serving. They have restrictions on people with physical alignments from serving. Fallen arches/flat feet pretty much got you exempted in the draft and these days you join up at your own risk with that condition, and they absolutely warn you when you get your physical. Being a hermaphrodite may be grounds to prohibit service.

In summation, you are talking out of your ass.
 
Apparent leak of security breach on 4chan posted sent accidentally to anon from a developer.

Screenshot_20211024-110056.png
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: HIVidaBoheme

New Trailer dropped and a release date, 17th of December.

Looks a bit flat in the lighting when looking through the camera but I'm sure that will be polished by release date.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Lizard Machine Bugs
Well Jonochrome is a pedo (the Onaf 3 guy), here's a video about it, now keep in mind it's made by a soy coomer but even a broken clock can be useful every now and then.

Note: a good part of the videos dedicated to him watching Markiplier play the first Onaf game, the real focus of the video starts at 2:47.
The tldw is that Jonochrome was friends with some underage girl, he brought up sex at random occasions but supposably didn't do anything further than that Jonochrome, afterwards he decided to make a sappy reply where he confirms that the allegations are real and says a lot of creepy shit while doing it.

The dude in the video says that it seems like she's trying to defend him and that he could be potentially trying to just trying to go the slow-burn approach but tbh honest I feel like (going off of what we know from his videos) that probably was the case, he comes off as a very beta sensitive person but I am not condoning his actions, just sharing my opinion on it.

To close this off, I want to say that it's a little humorous to say that they want him out of the community while he was already planning to do it himself but still I get the sentiment.

Either way his potential future Indie career is probably dead in the water because of this whole ordeal.
 
Last edited:
I guess the new one comes out today on PC and PS systems. I guess Microsoft doesn't want this trash on the Xbox system yet. I might play it for free for shits and giggles that's about the size of it. Can't wait for the dated Angry Birds Who Still Cares Crossover.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HIVidaBoheme
There's a part of Markiplier's first part of his Security Breach playthrough that I want to highlight mainly because of his dry delivery.

It's rich coming from him although but still funny.


Don't know how he fucked up this bad when saying "recharge station" but man did I shit my pants the first time I heard it.
 
Last edited:
Apparently it’s got some pretty major glitches/bugs in it.
It's not cyberpunk level of glitch but from what I've seen most let's players encountered their fair share of minor bugs (they have an earlier build tho).

It's kinda stupid to see ennemies clipping or teleporting in this kinda of game.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: SteelPlatedHeart
I was watching a playthrough and a major cutscene played twice. Once before being forced into a certain area, then the exact same cutscene after the player left the area.
I got a lot of glitches in the daycare area so far. Moon man got stuck a few times and would clip threw crap.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: s0mbra
Back