Foreskin Restoration

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Ha. Thanks for making me feel a bit more confident OP. It truly takes someone as autistic and sadistic as you to not only try to rebuild their lost foreskin, but post the failed results to people they don't know. At least I'm not that much of a fuck up.
 
Surf and TERF said:
My understanding is that most women think uncircumcised penises are unattractive.
Click to expand...

Really? No idea for women here but for guys into guys here it's the opposite. You'll lose pokes/waves on Grindr etc if you mention you're circumcised even if you're a 10/10.

Not that you won't get any attention, it's just that it's exclusively practiced for medical or religious reasons here; it's not the norm.
 
I'm 100% against GM, not even date a man who got the barbaric proceedure but thanks to the yank's glorification of cut cock, it's normalised and even think it's OK to do it to babies when they can't give consent and later in life resent their parents' decision.

OP, you're making a fool of yourself so stop it. I'm all for advocating anti circumsition and going against the ugly practise but please be smart about it or did the rabi take your brains too?

Thanks for the dick pics, now I know to not date a "restored" guy too, looks like weird pottery.
 
Kuchipatchi said:
OP, you're making a fool of yourself so stop it. I'm all for advocating anti circumsition and going against the ugly practise but please be smart about it or did the rabi take your brains too?
Click to expand...

Circumcision does cause brain damage. More so than being on active duty in war does. Higher rates of PTSD, about 50% (Ramos and Boyle (2000). Iraq war vets have about 20% rate of PTSD.

So actually, yes, by taking foreskin, they also take some of your brain functionality.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/moral-landscapes/201501/circumcision-s-psychological-damage
 
If you're circumcised then you should probably kys because you're less of a man without the penis skin sock.
 
Sofonda Cox said:
These insensitive faggots aren't being helpful. As my username implies, I'm a goddamn professional. So glad you joined us this evening!

Okay. The foreskin is lost, the nerve endings are lost, that's over, forever. And that's okay, because good heavens finding a man who can last more than a minute or two is a trial. Is this about sensitivity? You don't need more sensitivity. If you somehow do need more sensitivity, jerk off more gently and less often. That poor thing has been through enough.

The pics with the neo foreskin do not look natural, they look quite bizarre. In the dark, you'll "pass", but I'd love to know what compels you to "pass".

Uncircumcised dicks are icky. They just are. They look bestial, like dog dick. It's revolting. As you age, it will get more horrible - ask any carer in a geriatric home about this for more info.
There are bloodless, painless circumcision options now, such as the plastibell - infants aren't being traumatized anymore in modern facilities.

View attachment 897742

Your dick appears skinny. To me, this is the most egregious offense. The incredible stretch of a big, thick penis is the entire point of being with a man. If your dick improves considerably when erect, I'd love to see, but as it stands, 3/10, would not bang.

TL;DR - your foreskin is the least of your problems.

P.S - GROOM for the love of jesus, you've got hair up your shaft, ffs.
Click to expand...
D824675A-A95C-4732-B8A4-1AD93C07AE92.jpeg
 
I've heard that thickness is better than length. So a long cock without much girth is much less satisfying than a slightly shorter dick with a bit of wideness going on. Or so I have heard anyway.
Most disappointed at the lack of heart shaped pubes or hard cock. Would have been the icing on the cake for this thread.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom