Forgotten / Memory-holed Psyops - What things do you believe were pushed heavily into public consciousness only to be forgotten that they were pushed at all?

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

FunkTism

kiwifarms.net
Joined
Jun 8, 2025
Successful or Unsuccessful, what Psyops do you remember being pushed?

Global Warming / Global Cooling / Climate Change
Very Successful - Still going on
  • Constant fear-mongering with all of : Paid Science, environmentalists, Hollywood, World Governments, and more working at it.
    • Hollywood:
      • Constant movies, tv specials, and celebrities go on about how the world will end in 10+ years.
        • An Inconvenient Truth (2006)
        • DON'T LOOK UP
        • The Day After Tomorrow
        • No one seems to care or look back on the extremely wrong predictions.
        • Whenever these movies are made, they are used as """Evidence""" to have further government mandates and interference.
        • The vast majority of these films criticize only Western nations and not the nations with the largest contributions to the world's pollution (i.e., China, India, etc.)
        • A multitude of Celebrities who vocalize radical ideas to """save the planet"""
        • The Sanctification of Scientists and Government officials into the new priesthood:
          • Al Gore
          • Bill Nye
          • Gretra Thumburg
          • etc...
        • Remember when people demanded we had to kill off a large majority of America's Cows to Save the Planet and start eating bugs/going vegan
    • Government
      • Pressure on Tech firms to mark all people questioning Climate Change as conspiracy theorists
      • New Green Deal
      • Green credits
      • Banning Gas stoves
      • Forcing legislation forcing car manufacturers to end all gasoline
        • European Union (EU): All 27 EU countries have committed to banning the sale of new fossil-fuel cars by 2035.
        • United States - California: California has enacted a law as part of the Advanced Clean Cars II (ACC II) regulation, which mandates that all new passenger cars, trucks, and SUVs sold in the state will be zero-emission vehicles by 2035.
        • And many more
    • Environmentalists
      • Pressure not to have children or breed due to (((OVERPOPULATION)))
      • Allowing for Assisted Suicide to not eat up resources.
      • Eat the bugs (no need to elaborate, we all see it)
      • Leave a smaller footprint
        • This mindset leads to:
          • Small Homes
          • Small Apartments are being normalized
          • POD-LIFE!!!!
          • Communal Living
          • Renting
          • No Air Conditioning / Passive Cooling
          • No personal Transport
          • Electric Scooters / other forms of smaller single person focused transportation
      • CLIMATE MIGRANTS (aka allowing illegals due to climate change)

The many calls by the media and culture to assassinate Trump
  • Trump as Julius Caesar

And a ton of platforming by media, (online | TV | radio | etc..) talking about how Trump is Hilter a threat to democracy and a Tyrant. And praying that someone kill him and how they'd be a hero.
 

Attachments

  • Psyop.webp
    Psyop.webp
    41.4 KB · Views: 36
The biggest memoryhole to date hands down is Martin Shkeli. Despite interviews where he talked about the fact that what he was doing was an attempt to undercut Pfizer, media smeared his name into the dirt so hard they were able to change the public perspective of the narrative overnight. He fucked with pharmaceuticals and lost.
 
The biggest memoryhole to date hands down is Martin Shkeli. Despite interviews where he talked about the fact that what he was doing was an attempt to undercut Pfizer, media smeared his name into the dirt so hard they were able to change the public perspective of the narrative overnight. He fucked with pharmaceuticals and lost.
Can you expand on the "Undercutting Pfizer" I believe you as I remember him constantly getting lambasted and calls for him to be jailed.
 
The Covid Pandemic, as well as the whole push for the Covid Vaccine, both had a multitude of blatant psyops. I would argue they both count as "forgotten" or "memory-holed" today, since people collectively went insane for about 2 years enforcing masks and vaccines on each other, and are now pretending like none of it happened.

First- "Coronavirus" was a pre-existing medical term for a family of influenza viruses. Both "The Coronavirus" and "Covid-19" were medical labels which were intentionally popularized to create the appearance of a "new" disease (in the early days it was even called "the novel coronavirus"). While all were technically accurate terms, they were presented in ways intended to stoke fear in the populace at large, since most people are not familiar with all the naming conventions for diseases.

Second- Forcing everyone to wear face masks, regardless of the quality, or material, of said mask, was a psyop. We were told it was to stop disease, yet could take them off once seated in a restaurant. If you walked into a place with your shirt pulled up over your nose, you would be told to leave, but if you made a mask of the shirt material, they didn't care. Because it wasn't about actually wearing something to filter disease, it was security theater (to make people feel like they were doing something to be safe) and also a subconscious thing to remind everyone that we were "supposed" to be acting like there was a pandemic.

Third- There was some retarded slogan like "my mask protects you, your mask protects me" which implies masks only worked one way, and that if you got sick it was the fault of non-mask wearers, and some people actually bought it. This was why people got so angry at non-mask-wearers, because they were breaking the "pandemic" illusion simply by walking around unmasked and not getting sick. If the masks worked than the mask-wearers wouldn't have been worried about disease- hence the anger at non-maskers was simply because they did not comply.

They used the same rhetorical tricks later for the vaccine, to try and get vaxxed people to blame non-vaxers for the vaccine not working (as opposed to blaming the scientists, gov't, and media who all provably lied).

Fourth- They changed the definition of "vaccine" from something that prevents disease, to something that may or may not reduce symptoms. Yes, the actual American medical authorities changed the definition of a vaccine, so that they could call the covid "vaccine" by that name despite it's lack of effectiveness.

Fifth- During the pushing of the Covid "vaccine", the language they used for resisters was "vaccine hesitant" with the obvious implication being they were simply "hesitating" and would eventually give in. This was clearly a deliberate word choice meant to subtly peer-pressure people into thinking everyone would get the vaccine eventually.

Sixth- This blatant psyop shit that I actually saw on TV when it came out and thought I was hallucinating.

(Stephen Colbert Show, "Vax Scene", in case the video won't load)


Seven- The shitty "vaccine" that they claimed was 100% safe and effective, wasn't. I remember they initially called instances of vaxxed people getting covid "breakthrough" cases, before they had to stop covering it as it became the norm.

Edited for formatting.
There was way more silliness that happened during Covid, as well as outright lying involving cause of death, vax effectiveness, and so on. This is just the specifically psyop-ish stuff that I recall off the top of my head.
 
Last edited:
Can you expand on the "Undercutting Pfizer" I believe you as I remember him constantly getting lambasted and calls for him to be jailed.
Pardon it being Vice but this is the interview i'm referring to. I don't blame you for remembering it being that way but that's exactly what I mean- no matter how many times he actually said what his end goal was he has been completely overshadowed by a genuine psyop.
 
For a while there was a push for it to be trendy to raise kids the opposite gender or gender neutral. Celeb trash magazines talked about how cool and progressive it was. That narrative not only abruptly changed to "born this way/child-led", there was a complete memory hole and outright denial that his was ever a trend of something progressive parents did to their kids, and encouraged other parents to do to their kids.
 
Remember monkey pox?
No?
Exactly.
I remember the exact moment when it stopped getting pushed as Covid 2.0
Everyone knew pretty early on that the disease was contracted by Gay Men through their sexual deviancy.
Look up (Gay men monkeypox) and you'll see the insane amount of damage control in every article. (Yes Gay Men get it in the massive majority and during gay sex.....but uh that doesn't mean anything!!!)

So when the story broke about the gay couple's adopted son and the one about a gay men couple's dog also getting monkey pox. It raised questions WAY too uncomfortable for a Psyop to handle.
 
I watched the patient zero documentary and it may be one of the funniest things I've ever seen. Not only did this guy spread a lot of AIDS, in complete denial of having it in the first place, there are some really funny takes from gay men that make no sense. Like one guy says "it was the most beautiful form of love" about getting railed at a bath house by random men. That shit was massive in the 80s and almost nobody knows about it now, but hey at least there's a funny doc about it.
 
Third- There was some retarded slogan like "my mask protects you, your mask protects me" which implies masks only worked one way, and that if you got sick it was the fault of non-mask wearers, and some people actually bought it. This was why people got so angry at non-mask-wearers, because they were breaking the "pandemic" illusion simply by walking around unmasked and not getting sick. If the masks worked than the mask-wearers wouldn't have been worried about disease- hence the anger at non-maskers was simply because they did not comply.
"Save the masks for the healthcare heros" (March 2020)
-> (not even 2 weeks later) -> WEAR. A. MASK. OVER THE NOSE. SAVE LIVES

the most schizophrenic 180 by the political and media establishment. it seems everything that happened in 2020 and 2021 was memoryholed. Sometimes in conversation with people IRL I will bring things up from back then and they don't even know what I'm talking about. Some truly fucked up shit.
 
Remember ACID RAIN! It was everywhere and in so many films, books, cartoons, tv shows, and the news channels.
No one remembers it now.
A few other fun Acid Rain examples:
HeadLine News 1991
Ask NBC News about...Acid Rain
Action News Acid Rain
I remember it, it resulted in massive legislations to reduce sulphur emissions in power plants, which in turn reduced acid rain. Potentially it also reduced particulates in the air that increased cloud formation and generally reduced insolation, leading to increased sunlight reaching the ground. And thus higher temperatures.
There were also new legislations to reduce sulphur contents in bunker fuels for ships, resulting in the same effect over the oceans once all the sulphur oxides dissolved over the major shipping lanes. Suddenly, higher insolation started raising ocean temperatures a lot more than before.

But I don't think these are a psyop per se. They were issues that were fixed, same with the ozone hole. It's not a big topic anymore since FCCHs were banned and the ozone layer could recuperate to some degree.
They might have had the aforementioned side effects of sorta accelerating global warming. Or maybe they just masked the warming before. Either way, I think anyone who lived even in the 80s can attest that all the legislation of the 90s had a huge impact on air quality and general pollution.
One thing I would see as a psyop is, at least in Europe, the fight against diesel engines and nitrous oxide emissions. Well, less a psyop and more a campaign to destroy an industry.
 
On the subject of Muh Climate, if they were legit serious about the environment, India would already be cordoned off and firebombed. Instead, they import these animals by the boatload, 'people' who have succeeded in destroying their own environment.

1735850384476068.webp

Proof muh climate is bullshit. Indians are the ultimate example of short-term gain, long term loss. Great slaves, but they completely fuck everything up.

I watched the patient zero documentary and it may be one of the funniest things I've ever seen. Not only did this guy spread a lot of AIDS, in complete denial of having it in the first place, there are some really funny takes from gay men that make no sense. Like one guy says "it was the most beautiful form of love" about getting railed at a bath house by random men. That shit was massive in the 80s and almost nobody knows about it now, but hey at least there's a funny doc about it.
Ah. Dugas. The guy responsible for the spread of AIDS that still plagues us to this day.

The shitty part is, there were several doctors who were tracking him, tried to get him to stop but failed. Leading to the faggot dying of "Gay Cancer" as he called it. The fact that Big Gay is a foul mega industry right up there with Big Pharma, Mil Industrial Complex, and Big Food, they make sure this knowledge that AIDs is spread by faggots which was caused by one particular faggot is heavily suppressed. Factor in they're trying to get kids involved in fag shit through fag propaganda every fucking where goes to show how fucked things really are.

PDF related.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
The Covid Pandemic stuff
Another one for the pile.

>Covid vax roll out
>Sudden uptick in kids and athletics having strokes and heart attacks
>PSA about heart attacks in kids
>no chud, it's always been normal for kids to have fatal heart attacks and strokes

Of course you don't hear about it anymore now that the vax is no longer mandatory
Remember ACID RAIN! It was everywhere and in so many films, books, cartoons, tv shows, and the news channels.
No one remembers it now.
A few other fun Acid Rain examples:
HeadLine News 1991
Ask NBC News about...Acid Rain
Action News Acid Rain
Used to scare the shit out of my as a kid thinking I would have my skin melt off in a freak storm.
 
I remember it, it resulted in massive legislations to reduce sulphur emissions in power plants, which in turn reduced acid rain. Potentially it also reduced particulates in the air that increased cloud formation and generally reduced insolation, leading to increased sunlight reaching the ground. And thus higher temperatures.
There were also new legislations to reduce sulphur contents in bunker fuels for ships, resulting in the same effect over the oceans once all the sulphur oxides dissolved over the major shipping lanes. Suddenly, higher insolation started raising ocean temperatures a lot more than before.

But I don't think these are a psyop per se. They were issues that were fixed, same with the ozone hole. It's not a big topic anymore since FCCHs were banned and the ozone layer could recuperate to some degree.
They might have had the aforementioned side effects of sorta accelerating global warming. Or maybe they just masked the warming before. Either way, I think anyone who lived even in the 80s can attest that all the legislation of the 90s had a huge impact on air quality and general pollution.
One thing I would see as a psyop is, at least in Europe, the fight against diesel engines and nitrous oxide emissions. Well, less a psyop and more a campaign to destroy an industry.
Interesting but I wonder why if the legislations were so successful, why is it not touted as a perfect example of legislative environmentalism?
Because it was so pushed and in the public mind, personally, if I was one of the big advocates, I would be constantly flaunting this fact and using it to further justify actions across my platform.

-----

Another Fact being buried (not sure if a psyop) is the fact that Trees love CO2.
During the Greenhouse Gas scare the fact that Tree thrive in a CO2 rich environment has constantly been sidelined as an argument or even as a fact in of itself.
No one of importance or reach ever stated the easiest way to stop this CO2 gas which was....plant more trees. Which you would think would be the natural conclusion since "Save the Trees / Save the Rainforests" was huge in the 90s and 2000s.

On the subject of Muh Climate, if they were legit serious about the environment, India would already be cordoned off and firebombed. Instead, they import these animals by the boatload, 'people' who have succeeded in destroying their own environment.

View attachment 7587887

Proof muh climate is bullshit. Indians are the ultimate example of short-term gain, long term loss. Great slaves, but they completely fuck everything up.


Ah. Dugas. The guy responsible for the spread of AIDS that still plagues us to this day.

The shitty part is, there were several doctors who were tracking him, tried to get him to stop but failed. Leading to the faggot dying of "Gay Cancer" as he called it. The fact that Big Gay is a foul mega industry right up there with Big Pharma, Mil Industrial Complex, and Big Food, they make sure this knowledge that AIDs is spread by faggots which was caused by one particular faggot is heavily suppressed. Factor in they're trying to get kids involved in fag shit through fag propaganda every fucking where goes to show how fucked things really are.

PDF related.
When it comes to India if I were an English man, I would use the modern-day state of affairs as a perfect example to defend my history and identity against the State's mandated shame. Thinking that if we were still in charge none of this would be happening.
I genuinely don't know what it is about English people but they seem to enjoy the Nanny State and the generational shame/punishment. But I guess that is true about many European states.
 
Interesting but I wonder why if the legislations were so successful, why is it not touted as a perfect example of legislative environmentalism?
Because it was so pushed and in the public mind, personally, if I was one of the big advocates, I would be constantly flaunting this fact and using it to further justify actions across my platform.
That is indeed an odd thing, the sulphur and FCCC legislations are both prime examples of working environmental legislation, but they kinda disappeared from the public consciousness.
Another Fact being buried (not sure if a psyop) is the fact that Trees love CO2.
During the Greenhouse Gas scare the fact that Tree thrive in a CO2 rich environment has constantly been sidelined as an argument or even as a fact in of itself.
No one of importance or reach ever stated the easiest way to stop this CO2 gas which was....plant more trees. Which you would think would be the natural conclusion since "Save the Trees / Save the Rainforests" was huge in the 90s and 2000s.
Also very odd. Now the narrative is mostly that more plants won't do much good because, uh, trees and plants only grow better with more CO2 when all the other factors are also better, so new trees will just die and not help. Or something.
Which brings me to what I think is the actual reasoning here. Climate change action almost universally revolves around legislatives around control over the behaviours of private people. You have to stop eating meat, you can't drive a car anymore, you have to pay more for everything because renewable energy isn't actually all that cheap all things considered, and you have to accept millions of climate refugees. The sulphur filters on coal power plants and sulphur reduction in bunker fuels didn't have a direct effect on regular people, it was big companies that had to change. Same with different refrigerants and pressure gasses in hairsprays and whatnot. Planting trees doesn't control you and your day to day life. I think since climate change became the big thing and it was turned into the most pressing issue for (western) mankind, the focus shifted on using climate change to enact control over people.
That's why nuclear power is seen as evil. You'd think that since it's low in CO2 it'd be the perfect intermediate solution for power production. Yes, nuclear waste, but nuclear waste already exists and the problem must be solved somehow, some day, anyway. But nuclear power would retain the status quo, it does not require a full and expensive refit of the entire power grid to a decentralised and highly automated network with decades of high prices and instability ahead of us. The push for renewables is a measure to change the makeup of industry itself, and how markets work and so on.
 
The overpopulation scare encouraging families to have less or no kids, followed by mass importation of browns to solve the demographics crisis.

Incredibly sinister in retrospect. China also fell for it (probably harder than the West tbh) but haven’t done the second phase.
 
Back