- Joined
- Nov 7, 2017
This is all a lot of fuss over someone who's going to finish 6th this weekend
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If this results in Hill getting the boot I'll laugh my socks off.Archive
"Lewis Hamilton: 'Older voices' should be refused platform"
I agree someone 37 years old shouldn't be commenting on anything.
I thought F1 didn't like people who said hate speech? What Hamilton said is a textbook example of ageism. Mercedes needs to drop him immediately. #WeRaceAsOne, right?Archive
"Lewis Hamilton: 'Older voices' should be refused platform"
I agree someone 37 years old shouldn't be commenting on anything.
FIA WORKS OUT METRIC TO POLICE PORPOISING, REVEALS NEXT STEP
(article)
The FIA plans to enforce its new technical directive setting a limit for the vertical oscillations Formula 1 drivers can be subjected to from the French Grand Prix, meaning two more races will take place before it’s implemented.
A controversial effort from the governing body to combat car porpoising started with a data collection plan at the Canadian Grand Prix.
The new ground-effect cars are run low and stiff so have poor ride quality, and have also suffered from porpoising, and as several drivers from different teams have complained about back pain and raised concerns over potential long-term consequences of driving such cars, the FIA said it would intervene on safety grounds.
A new technical directive was only communicated to teams on Thursday before the previous race in Canada.
They were informed that the FIA intends to set a limit for the vertical oscillations drivers can be subjected to, and force teams to alter their set-ups if they are found to be breaching that limit.
The FIA has concluded its data collection and has sent a draft update to the technical directive issued prior to Montreal.
It has defined a metric by which to monitor the vertical oscillations and teams will now be asked to conduct their own analysis over the next two grands prix “to understand what, if any, changes they may need to implement in order to be compliant when the technical directive becomes effective as of the French Grand Prix”.
Updated parameters have also been issued relating to plank wear and skid stiffness, which the FIA intends to monitor to help enforce its new measurement plan.
It says these are “inherently related to the same issue, and go hand-in-hand with the metric”.
The FIA added: “These changes are necessary in order to provide a level playing field between the teams when the metric is implemented.”
One thing that has been changed is the use of a second floor stay – a short-term measure permitted by the FIA in Canada – has now been dropped.
It followed an initial agreement way back between the pre-season tests that teams could add a first floor stay, something not permitted by the regulations.
The late notice of the FIA technical directive suggested no team would be able to react in time to have a second stay on the car in Montreal, but Mercedes did.
Mercedes said the second stay, which appeared on George Russell’s car in FP1 and Lewis Hamilton’s as well in FP2, was an attempt at responding to the FIA technical directive on-site.
However, some teams disputed this – Ferrari and Red Bull among them.
That was an implication that Mercedes’ fast reaction was because it had some kind of advance information that this technical directive was coming.
In addition, Red Bull team boss Christian Horner even said that permitting the use of a second floor stay was “overtly biased to sorting one team’s problems out”.
Mercedes did not end up running the second stay beyond FP2 because it felt the experiment was not effective and it was removed for the rest of the weekend.
The second stay was considered by the FIA to be separate to phase two of the technical directive, which is defining and applying the bouncing limit.
But now neither element of the technical directive will be enforced by the FIA at Silverstone.
Archive
"Lewis Hamilton: 'Older voices' should be refused platform"
I agree someone 37 years old shouldn't be commenting on anything.
Archive
"Lewis Hamilton: 'Older voices' should be refused platform"
I agree someone 37 years old shouldn't be commenting on anything.
I'd imagine Merc would just be happy to get out of cursed FE, in all honesty. McLaren making decisions that go against what they previously wanted might not matter that much, since De Vries has already had a strange career trajectory for a young driver, and Toto looks determined to keep him around in some way or another. He's definitely safe (Or as safe as one playing bottom to Toto can be), but I'd imagine there's a reasonable enough chance they'd let it pass, at least for now.I hope someone asks Alonso his opinion on Hamilton's words.
In other news McLaren giving the boot to the merc drivers when they take over the FE team.
View attachment 3445225
View attachment 3445226
What will Wolff do now? He has some creepy obsession with De Vries so no way he's going to let him be out of a drive, and Vandoorne must have some incriminating pictures or something for someone to let him near one of their cars.
Every accusation of one -ism by the cancel mob always gets every other -ism added to it.Lol, Piquet's now being accused of homophobia towards Hamilton (despite the fact that Lewis isn't gay).
Can someone actually state if what he said was actually homophobic, or is it another nothing-burger like the racism accusation?
This is exactly why there's no point in apologizing to these types. They will simply find more crimes to hate you for.Every accusation of one -ism by the cancel mob always gets every other -ism added to it.
lmfao, Karun just said he wishes that F1 would ditch hybrid engines and use V10's running on biofuels![]()
Them mofos blocking a corner all the while underestimating the required braking distance would make for some excellent television.Oh please let me see some unwashed hippie meeting an F1 front wing at speed live on TV. Bonus points if its hambone they manage to get wrecked by.
Hamilton appears to back down in FIA jewellery row
Mercedes driver Lewis Hamilton has removed the nose stud that has been causing controversy since the Spanish Grand Prix weekend.
The FIA ordered that Formula 1 drivers were not to wear any jewellery whilst driving, a rule that has been in place since 2005 but never enforced before this season, and Hamilton was the focus after being given a two-race exemption, Spain and Monaco.
He continued to wear the stud in Montreal with no action taken, claiming that he needed surgical intervention to remove it.
However, it was reported that he could be banned from competing in his home race this weekend if he didn’t comply.
As a result, he removed the stud prior to first practice getting underway, stating that he was prepared to work with the FIA over the issue, even if he believed they had bigger issues they needed to work on.
"It’s kind of crazy to think, with all that is going on in the world, that is a focus for people. I would say that it is worrying, because we’ve got so much bigger fish to fry," said Hamilton, speaking to select members of the media, including RacingNews365.com.
"We’ve really got to start focusing on other, more important areas. I will be racing this weekend. I will be working with the FIA. I would say that the matter is not massively important.
"I will work with Mohammed [Ben Sulayem, president of the FIA] and his team so that we can progress.”
Archive