Dramacow Gabe Navarro / Moleman9000 / MolemanNineThousand / ResonX - 13 bans on Wikia

1. http://comments.deviantart.com/4/28279432/3214974627
Moleman9000 acting like a dA police officer.

2.http://comments.deviantart.com/4/14331513/3214975272
This is both malicious and illegal, and thus completely unacceptable.

3. http://comments.deviantart.com/4/14331513/3214627394
What's wrong with supporting censorship? Censorship is not inherently wrong; it can be used for both good and bad, it depends entirely on the context and what is being censored.

4. http://comments.deviantart.com/4/18313755/3220414573
Moleman9000 reporting "cyberbullies".

5. http://comments.deviantart.com/1/401917759/3220234015
Please take it down and stop being a cyberbully.
 
Alan Pardew said:
What's wrong with supporting censorship? Censorship is not inherently wrong; it can be used for both good and bad, it depends entirely on the context and what is being censored.
Wow. Really??? I'm not activist but I'm very anti-censorship when it comes to the arts and personal opinion. This just kind of blows my mind. Him not getting 1984 makes a whole more sense now though.
 
Looking at his artwork... I don't think I want to take what kind of drugs he's shooting up. :( They look... horrifying. In a way that's so bad that it might give children nightmares.
 
Salto said:
Looking at his artwork... I don't think I want to take what kind of drugs he's shooting up. :( They look... horrifying. In a way that's so bad that it might give children nightmares.

Shhhh. Don't post about what you think about the Nava-verse to Moleman if it's negative.

http://pastebin.com/uhba1GNu

<introman> I ask that you cease and desist nava-verse. that series personally attacks my eyes.
<Moleman9000> Intro–Man, what you just said is a very hurtful insult and a lie.
<Moleman9000> You can find my work shitty, but in that case you must keep it to yourself.
<Moleman9000> I admit it's NOT perfect and not for everyone.

http://pastebin.com/Wb1a8BC6

Jun 16 22:10:04 <Moleman9000_> I'll let it go if you apologize.
Jun 16 22:10:09 <JEWS> apologizing would be a good start
Jun 16 22:10:17 <JEWS> to me, i mean
Jun 16 22:10:19 <Moleman9000_> And acknowledge that my work is decent and harmless.
 
Salto said:
Looking at his artwork... I don't think I want to take what kind of drugs he's shooting up. :( They look... horrifying. In a way that's so bad that it might give children nightmares.

I remember seeing a thread in Spergatory about Sonichu and acid. I think we need to have a session of "Fear and Loathing in Moleman9000's Gallery".
 
Salto said:
Looking at his artwork... I don't think I want to take what kind of drugs he's shooting up. :( They look... horrifying. In a way that's so bad that it might give children nightmares.

His work isnt inspired by drugs he is taking a deep look at his mental state and recording it :cryblood:
 
Happy birthday, Moleman! What is the best way to celebrate your birthday? Whining about trolls, of course!

1. http://comments.deviantart.com/4/28128729/3228763995
Your continued being out to get me and "convince" others to be turned against me, as well as your associating almost exclusively with known cyberbullies, proves that you ARE a troll. There is overwhelming circumstantial evidence in favor of that notion.


2. http://comments.deviantart.com/1/403364731/3230320172
I am forcing you to "give a shit" on the grounds that you have continuously both bad–mouthed me and stolen my original ideas and claimed them as your own.

3. http://comments.deviantart.com/1/403228804/3229878987
She is a CONFIRMED cyberbully; not just a troll, but an outright CYBERBULLY.

4. http://comments.deviantart.com/1/403364731/3230323248
Moleman playing the blame game.

5. http://comments.deviantart.com/1/403364731/3226668176
The large comments section between Moleman and the "art thief".

6. http://comments.deviantart.com/1/403228804/3228778872
Moleman trying to justify his death threats.

I never threatened your kid, and my threats against you were and continue to be JUSTIFIED.

You run a cyberbullying site, sadistically pick on people you have no business with, attempt to steal others' ideas and claim them as your own, commit multiple–ban–evasion, vandalize others' personal sites, and FLAT–OUT LIE ABOUT ALL OF THIS even when you are flat–out called out on it.
 
Alan Pardew said:
http://comments.deviantart.com/4/28495014/3230916284

Please be sure to use tropes from TV Tropes/links to tropes from TV Tropes in your arguments.

Typical Moleman, acting like he's some sort of internet policeman.

Also what's his beef with TV Tropes.
 
TastyWB 2.0 said:
Alan Pardew said:
http://comments.deviantart.com/4/28495014/3230916284

Please be sure to use tropes from TV Tropes/links to tropes from TV Tropes in your arguments.

Typical Moleman, acting like he's some sort of internet policeman.

Also what's his beef with TV Tropes.

TV Tropes is one of his huge inspirations for his Navaverse. He even wrote an article about Navaverse on TV Tropes. The article was removed, and this was when he thought that the trolls who trolled him were "complete monsters", "malicious cyberbullies", yada yada yada etc.

http://pastebin.com/M9R4ReNE
[00] <Moleman9000> The Nava–Verse TV Tropes page was deleted today following my friend's repairing it.
[00] <Beekeeper_> I noticed
[00] <PissWoofer> I nopiss
[00] <vivivi> of course hes from tv tropes
[00] <vivivi> oh god lol
[00] <Moleman9000> Speak the truth: Did you have anything to do with that?
[00] <Beekeeper_> Yes
[00] <Moleman9000> Excuse me?
[00] <vivivi> and he loved Every Minute Of It.
[00] <Beekeeper_> I reported it, because it's not an actual thing you can write about
[00] <Beekeeper_> It's not note worthy
[00] <Beekeeper_> and bam
[00] <Moleman9000> Show me the documents.
[00] <PissWoofer> and piss
[00] <Moleman9000> TV Tropes does not have a notability criteria.
[00] <Beekeeper_> I don't have to show you anything
[00] <Moleman9000> I don't believe you then.
[00] <vivivi> Who cares
[00] <Beekeeper_> What's not to believe? your page got taken down
[00] <vivivi> you're a racist homophobe
[00] <Moleman9000> I care. This is very hurtful.
[00] <Beekeeper_> LOL
[00] <PissWoofer> PISS
[00] <Moleman9000> You are insulting my livelihood.
[00] <vivivi> its tv tropes are you serious?
[00] <Moleman9000> You are insulting ME. SEVERELY.
[00] <vivivi> ITS TV TROPES lol
[00] <Beekeeper_> Tv tropes is not serious biznis
[00] <Moleman9000> It was one of the main documentations of my work.
[00] <vivivi> Do you not see the pattern of you stressing yourself out over stupid shit?
[00] <Moleman9000> Look, I am allowed to continue producing my work and attempting to expand it. You cannot argue that. You are impeding on that right of mine.
[00] <Candy> nope
[00] <vivivi> No one is arguing that
[00] <Candy> i did not delete any of your work
[00] <Candy> except maybe the first wiki page
[00] <Moleman9000> You kind of did.
[00] <Candy> but everything else I ADDED
[00] <Moleman9000> You removed the valid examples from the trope page.
[00] <Candy> i gave you new pics of our Christ lord and savior
[00] <vivivi> All of Candys additions were the only good things on your wiki, Moleman9000
[00] <Candy> i told you i didn't touch your tv tropes page
[00] <Beekeeper_> Nava-verse simply should not have a TV-Tropes page
[00] <Moleman9000> That fucking seals it.
[00] <Beekeeper_> It's not nessesary, also you wrote it Moleman9000
[00] <Moleman9000> You are not, and have never been, human beings.
[00] <Candy> are you saying you don't like JESUS CHRIST?
[00] <Moleman9000> You are Complete Monsters.
[00] <Beekeeper_> HAHAHA
[00] <vivivi> Complete Monsters
[00] <Candy> see now you are talking like a nazi again
[00] <Candy> you're the one making monsters based on jews
[00] <Beekeeper_> Is that how you justify this?
[00] <vivivi> Hes sounded like one this entire time.
[00] <Beekeeper_> "YOU DISAGREE SO YOUR MONSTERS!"
[00] <Candy> now you are saying we aren't human
[00] <Candy> are you gonna put us in a gas chamber?
[00] <Candy> Enig was right
[00] <Candy> YOU ARE RACIST
[00] <Moleman9000> You have crossed every single line.
[00] <Candy> you're the monster
[00] <vivivi> EVERY SINGLE LINE
[00] <vivivi> what lines
[00] <Candy> nah, i was gonna hire toby to advertising for me
[00] <Candy> THAT WOULD HAVE CROSSED THE LINE
[00] <Moleman9000> The lines signifying the various levels of depravity.

Expect him to use more tropes in his comments, e.g. CompleteMonsters, BileFascination etc.
 
Moar drama and some old info:

1. http://comments.deviantart.com/1/405853358/3237707231
Him raging about "fanart" again of him.
It doesn't matter. This IS a personal attack, and I actively disapprove of it.

2. http://comments.deviantart.com/1/405268935/3236942239
No, it's extremely offensive and an act of cyberbullying. It is both unambiguously in violation of site rules and unambiguously malicious (i.e. if there are any exceptions to site rules out there, this sure as Hell is not one of them), and therefore absolutely must be removed.

3. http://comments.deviantart.com/4/28441378/3237821512
Him raging at a user profile resembling Moleman.

4. http://comments.deviantart.com/4/28441378/3234320113
No lolcow is complete without white knights. He has one called 10shiH now.

5. http://comments.deviantart.com/4/28495014/3235098992
Moar ACTIVE DISAPPROVAL of the Avan-Verse.

6. http://comments.deviantart.com/4/14331513/3235429651
Him acting like an Internet Politician again. No, listen to me: You MUST stop this behavior permanently and leave this site permanently. This is an ORDER. YOU HAVE NO CHOICE.

7. http://comments.deviantart.com/4/14331513/3230673276
No, it's not. You are the cyberbully known as "Candy" real name Willow Giovanna. You are the leader of a group of major cyberbullies dedicated to stealing my ideas and personally defaming me.

8. http://moleman9000.deviantart.com/critique/706924702/
Here's an old one, where he tard rages in a critique over hate art over Justin Bieber.
You want a critique for this piece of shit? Fine then, I'll give you a critique: This is horrible and you should feel horrible. Justin Bieber is easily in the top 100 musicians of all time and looks nothing like this. It is NOT cool to hate on him. Also, what gives you the right to judge based on appearance, or to tell other people how they should look? Justin Bieber is BARELY 18, of course he doesn't look very manly yet. "Manliness" in the archaic sense you use it in is chauvinistic and obsolete, and should in no way be used to measure the character of anyone.

9. Fanfiction, anyone? Old ones but fictions based on his Navaverse.
http://www.fictionpress.com/s/3047656/1 ... ry-Legends
http://www.fictionpress.com/s/3047651/1 ... the-Cosmos

10. http://moleman9000.deviantart.com/journ ... -251273857
An old journal from Moleman9000:
I arrived this evening and am writing this in my Grandma's lakeside condo. Driving all the way here took about ten hours, but was less painful than other times we've come here largely thanks to my newfound general patience. I spent much of the ride writing for Chapter 3 of Connor Thorn and the Film Reel of the Cosmos, and at this point I can truly assure you it's happening. You also seriously need to check up on my most recent pictures and "Lore", as the details of the universe I've been constructing are finally starting to come together and make sense! Besides, I'm not gonna keep writing this stuff if no one seems to actually be reading it: fav.me/d42aj9y

Anyway, here in Tahoe I'll be having lots of fun and all that stuff, with all the swimming, boating hiking and such. I will also be seeing my beloved cousin Shannon tomorrow, the day after I'm writing this, to whom, dare I say, I am somewhat attracted to. :iconpervplz:

– MolemanNinethousand :D

10.1: Apparently it's a joke now. :roll:
http://comments.deviantart.com/1/314770650/2645764218
That journal's more than two years old. Any "incestuous" expressions are limited to a single, mild comment that was meant as a joke. That cousin is not even a direct blood relative. Impure thoughts that are never acted upon and affect no one are not worth directly attacking anyone's person over.

Now explain yourself and your decidedly more malicious statements and actions.
11. Old one, but his profile on the Super Mario Wiki.
http://www.mariowiki.com/User:Moleman9000

11.1: http://www.mariowiki.com/User_talk:Moleman9000
The talk page, containing tard rages.
I can't believe I was just told that by the very creator of Youtube Poop itself! Super Yoshi, you, out of anyone, should understand the notability of youtube poop, seeing as you created the video that single handedly started this entire phenomenon. As for the rest of you, I find it odd that you would be complaining of my adding info that is "Non-notable" seeing that you here at this wiki constantly create articles that are EXTREMELY non notable- just look at all the pages for ONE TIME CHARACTERS, ITEMS, PLACES, etc. from various non-game media such as the cartoon series. Youtube POOP MATTERSmuch more that them and should be written about here. The articles on Hotel Mario and Mama Luigi treat the subjects completely seriously as if they were actual games and were actually well-known and accepted by fans. You do not even touch upon anything at all alluding to youtube poop or any internet memes started by this meterial, as if they didn't even exist. Yet you have an article on Bowser's Sourpuss Bread. I demand an explaination for this. Especially you, Super Yoshi.
(Note: He thinks the user profile SuperYoshi on the wiki is actually SuperYoshi on YouTube.)
What I'm trying to say is that even though it's an actual item, it's not important- on Wikipedia, they have guidelines on what isn't notable enough for its own article and frequently "merge" articles of characters and such into lists and such. However, recently this has been being abused to the point of luricrousy on Wikipedia, redirecting well-established characters who are the main characters in popular shows, games, etc., and making merging the rule rather than the exception. But on here, merging and in-universe notability isn't enforced Enough, to an equal degree of ludicrousy. Yet both sites refuse to accept YTP info... I want another explaination!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
STOP CALLING IT "FANON".

11.2: http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?titl ... utube_Poop
Note: Look at "Miscellaneous", then "YouTube Poop"
Similar to his tard rages on Wikipedia, Moleman9000 wants info about YTP on the Mario Wiki.
A: You say that the references pages are only for "professional content", that is predjudice. On the internet referances page, you cover the Mario parody made by Seth McFarlene, and since that and YTP are both made under the same circumstances on the same site, what makes them any different? B: Hotel Mario is no more "official" or "canon" to the Mario series than the cd-i Zelda titles are to the Zelda series. It was only Liscensed by Nintendo, they nod no involvement in making it, and it is NOT considered canon to the franchise. Neither is the SMW show or any of the other liscensed material covered here. C: What I mean when I talk about the articles on such things being written too seriously, look at the Mama Luigi article. THE IMAGE IS NOT THE PICTURE OF LUIGI SAYING "That's Mama Luigi to you, Mario!" and you go over the plot summary as if it was as canon as Super Mario World the game. The Mario cartoons were nothing more than a shameless and poorly made attempt to cash in on the success of Mario, and the ONLY reason Nintendo liscensed the characters to them is for MONEY. But, now in modern times, they have found a new audience and found a new place in culture, thanks to Youtube Poop, otherwise they would be forgotten. And yet you still refuse to even mention it, yet you have articles on CHARACTERS WHO ONLY APPEARED IN ONE EPISODE OF THE SERIES.

How is that fair?
I am not asking to actually change the existing content of the articles in such a manner. What I'm trying to say is, like, in the case of Hotel Mario, that game IS widely considered poor, non canon, and a discrace to the mario series like the CD-i Zelda Titles. THE WAY THAT THE GAME IS TREATED WHEN TALKED ABOUT IN THAT ARTICLE ONLY Seems out of place when it is the only content of the article. If I had my way with the article, I would keep everything that is already there intact and add a "reception" section that adresses the poor reception to the game and its cutscenes and diologue, and of course Youtube Poop. Same with the Mama Luigi article. And as for the page of internet references, I KNOW THAT I CAN'T SIMPLY ADD A SECTION FOR YOUTUBE POOP TO IT AND LEAVE IT LIKE THAT, because it lists so few things as it is, and leaves out many, many OTHER, non YTP Fanworks.

The way I would see fit to adress this is to CREATE A STANDARD FOR FAN FICTION based on prolificness and popularity for inclusion on the references page, and would need the help of many users to do so. Seeing as how hard this would be, I would prefer that we ADRESS FANON IN ARTICLES IN TRIVIA AND/OR RECEPTION SECTIONS, SEPERATE FROM THE MAIN CONTENT, which I would do with Mama Luigi and Hotel Mario. I would not want to list EVERY internet parody, only the most popular ones that have a fanbase.
ONLY GAMES THAT ARE PUBLISHED BY NINTENDO ARE CANON. Games liscensed to other companies and other-media spinoffs are OFFICIAL, but not CANON. The reason I am aggravated about this is because you cover ALL of these things on the same level of maticulous detail and disregard for notability and importance that you do with the canon games, yet YOU REFUSE TO EVEN MENTION YOUTUBE POOP OR ANY OTHER FAN-MADE WORK, even if it's seperate from the "official information".
Lastly, in The Simpsons Game, Mario says during a cutscene, "I HOPE ITSA SPAGHETTI" in a manner VERY similar to Lugi's "I hope she made Lotsa spaghetti!"
 
  • Like
Reactions: dead76
He takes YouTube Poops WAY too seriously. As well as the damn Internet, trolls and the Navaverse. It's funny how he doesn't take real life seriously. Must be the 'tism.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Mr. Awesome Man
Back