Dramacow Gabe Navarro / Moleman9000 / MolemanNineThousand / ResonX - 13 bans on Wikia

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
c-no said:
Moleman9000 said:
Being gay, while wrong, does not negatively affect others in and of itself. What you're doing IS negatively affecting me, and DELIBERATELY so.
IF ITS NEGATIVE TO ME, IT MUST BE ILLEGAL TO ALL! NO EXCEPTIONS!!!
Just how does being gay affect him negatively?
Has to spend more time looking at his Sailor Moon poster to stay straight.
 
c-no said:
Moleman9000 said:
Being gay, while wrong, does not negatively affect others in and of itself. What you're doing IS negatively affecting me, and DELIBERATELY so.
IF ITS NEGATIVE TO ME, IT MUST BE ILLEGAL TO ALL! NO EXCEPTIONS!!!
Just how does being gay affect him negatively?
I think the quote is taken a bit out of context. By "what you are doing", Moley is referring to trolls vandalising his Nava-verse wiki, or whatever it was that pissed him off at the time.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: nanny911
Varis said:
c-no said:
Moleman9000 said:
Being gay, while wrong, does not negatively affect others in and of itself. What you're doing IS negatively affecting me, and DELIBERATELY so.
IF ITS NEGATIVE TO ME, IT MUST BE ILLEGAL TO ALL! NO EXCEPTIONS!!!
Just how does being gay affect him negatively?
I think the quote is taken a bit out of context. By "what you are doing", Moley is referring to trolls vandalising his Nava-verse wiki, or whatever it was that pissed him off at the time.
If that is the case then perhaps he assumed any homosexual who disagreed with him had to be a troll in his mind.
 
c-no said:
If that is the case then perhaps he assumed any homosexual who disagreed with him had to be a troll in his mind.
It's possible that he made that connection later. In the IRC log he states that he is against homosexuality because da babble sez it's a sin, but not against gay people themselves.
 
1. http://luizao940.deviantart.com/art/OC- ... -411283387

Grab some popcorn. :popcorn: Moleman9000 is now in a tardrage war with the members here now.

http://comments.deviantart.com/1/411283387/3265336462
http://comments.deviantart.com/1/411283387/3264927267
http://comments.deviantart.com/1/411283387/3264803459

2. http://comments.deviantart.com/4/25246804/3265092280

How dare you associate with these fucking nasty cyberbullies!!1

3. http://comments.deviantart.com/4/28850234/3265332598

You don't have a choice. Get that hammered into your skull.

4. http://comments.deviantart.com/4/23340990/3265495851

How dare you insulting me for a mental condition!!!!1

5. http://comments.deviantart.com/4/14331513/3265303085

A tardrage war with a CWCki Forums member.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: BOLDYSPICY!
c-no said:
FemboiBunny said:
Ok, this is the first time i hear of this guy, and for what i understand, he's just another lolcow but, he takes the internet too serious (like many other lolcows) and think that only his opinion is validand right, but the rest of opinions are wrong, he hates wikipedia for focusing on, you know, important things like key characters from important works of literature, but not on da yootub poops... he believes that everybody that doesn't think like him is automatically a twoll/cyberbully, he believes that if a book doesn't have a happy ending that pleases him, then it's garbage (even if a lot of great and classical books are tragic, that's why the "drama" genre was born), and he's a homophobic piece of shit... wow...
I'd like to know where that is mentioned. I don't really know what he is known for other than looking at his awful pieces of art and seeing how he acted towards 1984.

A bit late, but yeah, he believes that homosexuality is a sin because... well, it's a sin!! but unlike opl, he's just a bigoted homophobic, but he doesn't seems to freakout everytime somebody calls him gay.
 
Protip, Mole: just because you find it offensive doesn't mean it's meant to be offensive. That's a U problem.

I need a new troll account.
 
Okay his wacky rap battles gimmick, why the hell would you put Shinji from Eva against Rorschach? That doesn't make a lick of sense. Shinji is a whiny bitch. Rorschach doesn't stand for that shit in the least and would kill his dog.

This alone makes me want to see him trolled.
 
DrChristianTroy said:
Okay his wacky rap battles gimmick, why the hell would you put Shinji from Eva against Rorschach? That doesn't make a lick of sense. Shinji is a whiny bitch. Rorschach doesn't stand for that shit in the least and would kill his dog.

This alone makes me want to see him trolled.

I take it you haven't seen L vs. L.Ron Hubbared. That is a nightmare of shit.
 
[youtube]egcDgDNBaBc[/youtube]
MOAR Moleman9000 IRL.
 
http://www.mediafire.com/download/ky628 ... _47568.zip

Here's an archive on 789chan's second (or third? IDK) thread on Moleman9000.

Moleman9000 said:
What I commented on wasn't even real porn.
Moleman9000 said:
Attraction to unrealistic drawings of minors that are meant to be erotic =/= Pedophile.
Moleman9000 said:
I am NOT a pedophile. I am not attracted to children in real life and would NEVER, EVER violate one. That's just sick.
Moleman9000 said:
Shut up, smart–ass prejudiced bully.
Moleman9000 said:
Please don't vandalize my wiki. You'll be sorry for it.
Moleman9000 said:
Fictional minors (mostly teenagers, FYI) who are unrealistically drawn to be sexy =/= Real children
Moleman9000 said:
You're also forgetting that I'M ONLY 18. I'm not some creepy old man (which is ironic, considering my namesake).
Moleman9000 said:
I am not a failure, I am developing my Navaverse into a fullblown franchise, and once I get it to a publisher, I'll have a steady income.
Moleman9000 said:
Whatever. If a franchise has enough exposure from being published, people will buy from it just because it exists. So when I get my Navaverse fiction published, there's a chance alot of people will buy it.
Moleman9000 said:
The fact that there are (active) wikis dedicated to her (Note: It's Sally Acorn) series is proof in itself that she is notable. Also, Wikipedia is supposed to be all–inclusive.
Moleman9000 said:
Because Wikipedia claims to be the be–all source of fact, and that everything in it, as represented there, is true. The site is guilty of severe Google–bombing; it is on the first page of results for EVERYTHING that's covered on it whatsoever, even the things it doesn't do justice.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: dead76
Back