Games Journalism General

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I'll laugh my ass off if this insufferable prick thinking shitting on the advertisers of his employer was what did it. Hasn't he ever heard of Sam Biddle, who gloated about losing Gawker millions with his shitlordery?

And Biddle just infuriated readers enough they went on an apeshit rampage burning down Gawker's advertisers. Schreier literally directly attacked the advertisers himself? How is it possible to be this fucking stupid? I guess he assumed he was just bulletproof, having gotten away with so much absolutely self-destructive, idiotic bullshit already.

Here's the actual article Schreier was tweeting. It was deleted but still in cache:

This is the Gawker Gang we're talking about: they got so emboldened by shitting on their audience ("GAMERS ARE OVER. THEY DON'T HAVE TO BE YOUR AUDIENCE", because somehow knitters and bowlers will fill in that vacuum, right?) that they thought shitting on the very people responsible for their income was a swell idea.

Splinter just imploded a few weeks ago. io9 got folded into Lifehacker. The main Gawker page got Hulkamania'd into oblivion. The Consumerist, Valleywag, and Fleshbot got sold off a long time ago. Nick Denton - the faggot who invented that CancerAIDS - had to sell off his ownership of Gawker Media to univision for a loss so he could pay the court fees to Hulk Hogan and avoid bankruptcy.

This whole bullshit could have been avoided if Nathan Grayson was shitcanned instead of circling the wagons around him and Chelsea. Hope those low effort blowies were worth it, Nate!
 
Kotaku is Falling Down
Falling Down
Faliing Down
Kotaku is falling down
Im so happhy

Now all that's left are Vox Media, Buzzfeed, The New York Times, The Mary Sue, and Vice
 
Kotaku is Falling Down
Falling Down
Faliing Down
Kotaku is falling down
Im so happhy

Now all that's left are Vox Media, Buzzfeed, The New York Times, The Mary Sue, and Vice

Deadspin looks like it got hit worse, but nobody gives a fuck about Deadspin. The timeline of events seems to be that they were told to write about sports since their employer was paying them to write about sports, and instead of doing their job, they started shitposting about nonsports nonstop to show them who was boss.

Guess who was actually boss though?
 
Tbh, not that I find it to be a big deal, but back when that channel was Happy Video Game Nerd (?), that was the first time I ever heard the term male gaze, used sincerely no less, in the Parasite Eve series review.

That and the fat stoner used to really want to stream Depression Quest when they were streaming Clock Tower or Illbleed years ago.

Oh, I didn't mean that they're not woke. I meant that people that are woke can cover things without sperging about contemporary politics.
 
Deadspin looks like it got hit worse, but nobody gives a fuck about Deadspin. The timeline of events seems to be that they were told to write about sports since their employer was paying them to write about sports, and instead of doing their job, they started shitposting about nonsports nonstop to show them who was boss.

Guess who was actually boss though?

Waaahh! Our boss expects us to write about sports for a sports site! Waaah! I'm going to throw my poop and tell everyone that only doo-doo heads go to sports sites for sports news, when they should be reading my article on why everything Bad Orange Man does makes me pee myself!

Fuck, i'm fired now.
 
That's why a game has to succeed as a game before it can be "art" on top of that. Either it's art because it succeeds at that so well that its quality is something in itself, like Tetris, or does it somehow else. Unfortunately, what games journalist tards mean when they say something is "art" is that it has qualities of something other than being a game, like being a movie, a novel, or something else they're more comfortable calling "art." This is fundamentally wrong-headed, because nothing is art by being something not itself. That is, instead, how something is bad.

This is why you see these idiots praising something with a couple of hours strung between some cutscenes, and their idea of true "art" as a "game" is essentially a series of cutscenes with no gameplay at all.

I agree completely. That's why its so hard, because these dumb fucking bastards don't like games at all.

Even more, it generally has to be something they see as pushing their personal ideology if they're going to call it "art".


Boy they've changed.

Incidentally it's not that I'm morally opposed to clothes falling off as a character takes damage as a concept. Just, it's a concept that belongs in a porn game and is unnatural and jarring in this context.

Exactly, it has to be political too. Politics is not a requirement for art.

Clothes falling off is ok, as long as it fits the context of the game and in a game like parasite eve, it should be more horrific, bleeding and things like that. If you turn it to sexy, then uh, no. It doesn't work.

This whole bullshit could have been avoided if Nathan Grayson was shitcanned instead of circling the wagons around him and Chelsea. Hope those low effort blowies were worth it, Nate!

Is Kotaku is seriously dead? Holy fuck.


Polygon is next. Let them all move to ResetEra to write reviews there while they all get banned.
 
I agree completely. That's why its so hard, because these dumb fucking bastards don't like games at all.



Exactly, it has to be political too. Politics is not a requirement for art.

Clothes falling off is ok, as long as it fits the context of the game and in a game like parasite eve, it should be more horrific, bleeding and things like that. If you turn it to sexy, then uh, no. It doesn't work.



Is Kotaku is seriously dead? Holy fuck.


Polygon is next. Let them all move to ResetEra to write reviews there while they all get banned.
Not dead... more like it has a disease with a low survival rate
 
Place your bets on how long it will take until one of the ex journalists have a complete breakdown on twitter because they got spammed with learn to code. I reckon it will take atleast 2 days
They wouldn't be told to do that if they learned to write.

Do they honestly think they're in that high demand with the way they're acting? All a potential employer (who likes to keep their business running profitably) has to do is look at their social media and "Not on my time, not on my dime".
 
They wouldn't be told to do that if they learned to write.

Do they honestly think they're in that high demand with the way they're acting? All a potential employer (who likes to keep their business running profitably) has to do is look at their social media and "Not on my time, not on my dime".
Yes, they think they're the bees knees and believe that they could easily get a job at any massive media company
 
I think this counts as Games Journalism


Guy documents everything about the 3do (including homebrew) because zero documentation exists.

This is actual Games Journalism. What he did was on par with how GOG sends teams of people out into the field (yes they actually do turn up at dev's houses) to investigate leads and preserve data. Tracking down the rights and builds to stuff was what kept most of the old AD&D games from being brought back to the PC before GOG went globetrotting. Some shit was actually lost media.
 
That's why a game has to succeed as a game before it can be "art" on top of that.

it needs both, no one plays a game with the best story and gameplay if it looks like shit and vice versa, although the latter is much easier to sell to casuals.

Waaahh! Our boss expects us to write about sports for a sports site! Waaah! I'm going to throw my poop and tell everyone that only doo-doo heads go to sports sites for sports news, when they should be reading my article on why everything Bad Orange Man does makes me pee myself!

it worked long enough tho, remember that rock band 3 preview article?

Place your bets on how long it will take until one of the ex journalists have a complete breakdown on twitter because they got spammed with learn to code. I reckon it will take atleast 2 days

add some gamergate tags as frosting. they're they only one keeping it alive as an eternal boogieman, just spin it that they lost to GG of all things.
the salt and butthurt will be immense.
 
They wouldn't be told to do that if they learned to write.

Do they honestly think they're in that high demand with the way they're acting? All a potential employer (who likes to keep their business running profitably) has to do is look at their social media and "Not on my time, not on my dime".

They feel that way because that kind of "I'm hot shit"/devil-may-care attitude was part of corporate culture over at Gawker Media and was celebrated for many years - to a point where even the CEO and other execs had that kind of attitude in a coutroom, during a case they were losing badly.

The problem for Kotaku (and most of those sites) is that they're under new ownership and it takes time for the new owners to assess the assets they've purchased. Univision didn't just buy Kotaku, they bought the entirety of Gawker media - a large number of employees, contracts, HR notes, profits and loss sheets, outstanding obiligations, etc - and they had to run through these for every site they now own. Then, once the new owners have a handle on it, they need to figure out if they can intergrate your site into their existing or new media strategy and if they can't, start thinking about spinning you off and selling you. (See also - Verizon's sale of Tumblr).

Kotaku was mediocre for most of this time - and mediocre is good when you're trying to keep a low profile. Kotaku probably wasn't making money but considering how shit Games Jounralism pays typically, it probably wasn't costing huge amounts to run and likely wasn't a high priority for the new management team to look at - they probably could have coasted for a few more years.

However, as we know, Kotaku staff is retarted and didn't take any of this into account and in the last month has tried very hard to make sure to get themselves some very bad publicity - primarily.

- Writing an article about Anime Porn (on a video game site) and having actual, porn pictures of anime characters who are aged 10 years old, uncensored and not behind any kind of age verification. The new owners probably didn't love the advertiser push back/bad press from this one.
- Complaining public about "behind the scenes" issues with advertisers (primiarly, the type of ads run). Instead of discussing this with management directly, or handling it in a smart way, having your staff direct the users to harass advertisers who almost certainly, instantly, complained to management and likely threatened to pull ads not just from Kotaku, but all Gawker/Univision sites.

It's one thing to not be profitable, it's another to fuck up revenue for the entire company. This likely made them priority #1 for Univision's leadership team and they clearly did not like what they say (reasonably so). I'd be curious if they junk the entire thing or if they try and find someone not retarted to run the site and bring the focus back to Video Games.
 
It's one thing to not be profitable, it's another to fuck up revenue for the entire company.

That shit was just amazing. It's not like even the boomeriest of boomer management don't know that these obnoxious, shitty autoplay ads piss people off, so what does it mean if they take such ads anyway? It means your shithole outlet isn't producing income and management is desperately trying to squeeze some income out of you useless fuckers.

So what do they do? They throw a tantrum and start flinging shit, and the shit starts hitting the entire corporate structure. The result is obvious to anyone who isn't a moron, but these insulated little crybabies have lived in their own shitty little world for so long they couldn't see it coming. They're used to acting like spoiled brats, screeching about gamergate and other shit nobody cares about, and getting away with it all.

I was kind of amazed the general Gawker "shit on the entire world" mentality somehow survived the obliteration of the Gawker corporate umbrella and none of these clowns figured out the reality distortion field wasn't protecting them any more, but apparently reality finally caught up with them.

Their new corporate purchasers apparently hadn't brought the axe down at first because they were trying to figure out what to do with these subpar assets they bought at fire sale prices. So what did these morons do? They established they are, in fact, as utterly worthless as they looked.

CHOP CHOP.

It's so fucking delicious. It couldn't have happened to nicer people.
 
Back
Top Bottom