Sometimes I wonder what the point of Vtubers is if most of them are just real people but with a cool avatar.
I've always thought of it as a way for people who think they're not attractive enough or may have other hang-ups about appearing on camera to become entertainers. It's a medium where personality is by far more important than appearance, so I think it's a way for average-looking people to level the playing field against the more attractive people.
Nah, I hate people. I just want to see interesting characters be entertaining. I don't want real people to blog about their lives and what they did in a day. I feel like Vtubers are sitting on a potential new avenue to do something interesting. For a little bit I wanted to be a VTuber myself. But I'd want to be a cool character and act out as that character to a live audience. Creating a cool story or maybe even a full ARG. if I could I'd get other Vtubers involved and do a whole shared universe of stories with audience interaction. But I think what I want isn't what others want and that's okay. I might do the thing I want to at some point if I can find the time and money to justify doing it for free. I will enjoy my 2 views.
However people bring up Pippa, she's playing a character. That's why I like her. She's playing an interesting character. People in this thread got disapointed when it was revealed the real person didn't match the character. I don't mind because I have no interest in the real person. I just want the silly autistic rabbit woman. I don't mind that the real woman is basic and boring because I will never meet the real person. I just see the character.
Think of any other medium where a person plays a character, and they're almost always going through a prewritten story. If you stay in character and just do the same shit with it day after day, it gets old. If you do something with it, like a storyline, that generally has to be planned out in advance, or it's going to suck. Otherwise you end up with Ax Cop levels of lolrandom bullshit, inconsistent characterization, repetitive storylines that never end, etc. That limits audience interaction, which is one of streaming's biggest advantages over legacy media. If you allow audience interaction to shape the story, you run into problems like too many creative visions colliding or most people being mediocre at best at storytelling. TTRPG players will probably tell you that when your group gets bigger than 4 to 6 player characters, it becomes an absolute clusterfuck. You're also going to run into a lot, and I mean a shit ton, of coomer degeneracy trying to work its way into your story.
I think at best, you could deliver storylines in short, finite doses. Have your audience help you write a play, then act it out. Then have your audience help you write a sequel or whatever, then act it out. That takes advantage of streaming's interactivity and may help avoid problems like a meandering story that never ends. If you act as the director/editor and help edit the script your audience comes up with, maybe you can avoid some of the problems that come with writing by committee, and maybe you can head off the inevitable
feet feet ara ara booba feet mommy trampling bullshit.
ARGs are autistic as fuck and gayer than actual gay sex. If you cater to the ARG crowd, you only invite the gayest, most autistic children on earth to become parasocial with you.