- Joined
- Apr 18, 2019
"Stop talking about things other people post online" is getting there.A copycat wouldn't be coming here to make reasonable-sounding arguments to begin with. They'd come here to get Phagan to make Karl look sane by comparison.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"Stop talking about things other people post online" is getting there.A copycat wouldn't be coming here to make reasonable-sounding arguments to begin with. They'd come here to get Phagan to make Karl look sane by comparison.
I get the impression that a lot of the posters here, particularly those with technical knowledge about weapons, participate in online discussions on the wider internet using different accounts.There are maybe a dozen people that regularly post in this thread and the gun thread. I refuse to believe anything talked about here gets traction elsewhere in the gun-sphere. We are not the autistic illuminati of guns or anything else.
I agree. It's not always we see an occasional thread subject showing up and not immediately sperging out. That's commendable.I get the impression that a lot of the posters here, particularly those with technical knowledge about weapons, participate in online discussions on the wider internet using different accounts.
I think he should be commended for wanting to engage with criticisms and defend his product.
I agree. It's not always we see an occasional thread subject showing up and not immediately sperging out. That's commendable.
I still think the KP-15 is a gimmicky piece of kit (nothing wrong with selling yourself on novelty, though), but I'm not going to throw guilt by association at Phagan because he's friends with Karl or whatever. The guy is selling a product. It thrives or dies on its own merits. And after all, from what my relatives in Arizona told me, being friends with Karl is punishment enough.
Part of the issue is seeing the contrast between current InRange, which currently feels very scatterbrained and very Q&A-heavy in its subjects, and Forgotten Weapons (which despite pervasive sound issues is always steadily improving in technical terms). InRange was always more of a "variety" channel for sure, but Karl does not do very well when left to his own devices. You can see it even in the old InRange videos: whenever Karl had someone to talk to while filming, the videos were consistently better in terms of pacing and delivery than his solo videos. His vignettes are very informative, but again... the pacing and delivery tend to be flat.If you ever browse the Spoony thread you'll notice the real haters bordering on complete A-Logs are those that used to be fans and watch his content.
Karl is no where near Spoony levels of self pity and dysfunction, but it's important to remember that he is capable of making decent videos.
Videos like Pancho Villa's raid on Columbus New mexico.
Or a massacare at a POW camp in Utah.
Karl at one point had an eye for choosing topics that were genuinely interesting, even if he had a wooden delivery and poor production values. His problem is less that he's gotten woke or started associating with weirdo's. It's that he's lazy.
His video on the Danziger Bridge shooting could have gone viral (as it was it got 170k views), however the sound on the video is pretty poor. Remember that Karl is a professional YouTuber there's really no excuse for it.
Indeed. That was a good one.Anyway to end on a better note, if you're going to do a GoFundme video, Karl leads the way in showing how it should be done.
I wonder if he's exaggerating a little, playing it up to make the product look good, but ultimately it's still obvious he's fond of the rifle. He was part of designing it, and it has the exact qualities he's looking for with a 2-Gun rifle.I believe him when he says it's his favorite.
I think a monolithic plastic lower is a great idea for those looking to shave ounces and make a lightweight build, and certainly there's advantages in cost. My issues are more from the production, I've seen a fair few lowers with issues like sloppy fitting and poor symmetry, not all of them, not even the majority of them, but enough that it makes me skeptical of it as a product. The design itself I think is ok.There is a reason for every design decision on the KP-15. You may not agree with some of the design choices on the KP-15; but every decision is a balancing act of features, function, cost, and execution.
And that makes it all the more funny that a Goon tried to shoot up an anti-lockdown protest a couple of weeks back (he only lightly injured an ethnic minority he was trying to murder). A huge chunk of SA's userbase argued that there wasn't really anything wrong with what he did because they were allegedly white supremacists, and that there was nothing wrong with the fact that he had partaken in threads where he and others were constantly riling each other up and talking about hatred and their fantasies about political violence.The last thing I publicly commented on was saying Kyle Rittenhouse was probably legally justified based on the video evidence in 2020 and I got banned from SomethingAwful for it.
You have to understand the mentality of these people who think they're actual operators / training for war. Any kind of weight saved, despite the end user not being able to run a mile in kit without having a heart attack, will make them the bestest shooter at the 2/3 gun competition because ???My main gripe here has been an opinion. I don't think the oz weight savings of a polymer lower vs aluminum are worth it.
I mean it probably is a good gamer gun though.will make them the bestest shooter at the 2/3 gun competition because ???
You're right, the mere ounces saved wouldn't be noticed by someone who does it for a living; but they probably are noticable for the average civilian end-user, simply because they're not in shape, and/or carrying an extra 60lbs of ammo & gear. The difference between a 5lb & 5.5lb rifle is certainly noticable & meaningful for someone with limited strength.Any kind of weight saved, despite the end user not being able to run a mile in kit without having a heart attack, will make them the bestest shooter at the 2/3 gun competition because ???
Which is why it's continually amusing to me that these people always focus on the latest toys and gadgets rather than the literal cheapest option; personal fitness.You're right, the mere ounces saved wouldn't be noticed by someone who does it for a living; but they probably are noticable for the average civilian end-user, simply because they're not in shape, and/or carrying an extra 60lbs of ammo & gear. The difference between a 5lb & 5.5lb rifle is certainly noticable & meaningful for someone with limited strength.
Even when I did do it for a living, I wouldn't have noticed if I was carrying a WWSD or an A4 carbine at the end of a 10 mile ruck. The only thing that made a difference was to not get stuck humping the 249 or spare barrels.
I think a monolithic plastic lower is a great idea for those looking to shave ounces and make a lightweight build, and certainly there's advantages in cost. My issues are more from the production, I've seen a fair few lowers with issues like sloppy fitting and poor symmetry, not all of them, not even the majority of them, but enough that it makes me skeptical of it as a product. The design itself I think is ok.
Any future plans for a corresponding upper receiver? I think it could be done.
You must have seen that ban coming when you hit post.
I mean it probably is a good gamer gun though.
So a serious question for you Phagan, have you paged through the rest of the thread or are you just focused on the here and now? I'm genuinely curious what your thoughts are on some of the other things discussed here if you feel like sharing.
Humor us. I could personally give a fuck less about your plastic rifle, I'm not in your demographic and have no interest in it whatsoever but I would like to see your opinions and hot takes pertaining to other subjects.I did but quoting stuff from weeks or months ago and engaging with it now, doesn’t seem like the normal form of conduct on boards. Kind of like necroposting.
To Karl's credit, he did a few videos on personal fitness and how it related to his specific brand of 2-gun match. Unfortunately, these days it seems Ian is keeping up with his exercise regime better.Which is why it's continually amusing to me that these people always focus on the latest toys and gadgets rather than the literal cheapest option; personal fitness.
I mean, don't get me wrong, I love new toys and technology. I just get a kick out of fatasses trying to play soldier too.
You're not wrong but even so.I did but quoting stuff from weeks or months ago and engaging with it now, doesn’t seem like the normal form of conduct on boards. Kind of like necroposting.
From what I've seen personally, this is accurate. But then again, the standard was pretty low/nonexistent previously. I was always struck by Cav Arms as being run by someone indifferent at best.The worst of KE’s parts are still better than the best Cav Arms made; and customers who own both say that regularly.
An injection & blow molding shop I worked for prototyped & made Corvette engine shrouds; I remember it took over 10k parts just to achieve something like 70% GO rate initial QA/QC, and a bunch always failed to guage after the secondary operations. They weren't even complicated or hard-wearing parts; we worked on that press & molds for months, and this wasn't a small business with limited resources.A large number of process improvements happened over the first 10,000 parts. One notable one being improved vibration welder fixtures that holds alignment between the two halves better.