General GunTuber thread

One of the reasons why Phagan is being sued is he is alleged to have helped facilitate the transfer of intellectual property from Shawn Nealon to KE Arms. Intellectual property that did not belong to Shawn Nealon and KE Arms had no right to purchase. Also, it is alleged that Phagan lied when he sold "ALL" the intellectual property of the CAV-15 lower to GWACS. So in other words you cannot trust a word that Phagan makes. Care to comment Phagan?
That technology is in the breeze now; what difference at this point, does it make? What's your part in this?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Archie_Kimkicker
That technology is in the breeze now; what difference at this point, does it make? What's your part in this?
I guess things should be broken down. Cavalry Arms sold all its intellectual property to Phagan. Phagan then sold all of that intellectual property to GWACS. Phagan was employed by all three companies by the way. Phagan is at KE Arms and KE Arms goes to the owner of Cavalry Arms and purchases blueprints and intellectual property. In GWACS lawsuit they are quite explicit about what was purchased from Nealon and how much was paid for it, $1,000 in cash and $9,000 in firearms accessories. Oh, and that Phagan assisted KE Arms in the development of the KP-15 with knowledge that he had no right to share. Then something about trademark infringements etc and broken contracts.

The allegations are that Phagan, Brownells, and KE Arms sign contracts that they are not wiling to live up too. GWACS is claiming that Phagan lied to them when he sold them the intellectual property. They are also claiming that Phagan broke his non-disclosure agreement when he left his employment with GWACS and went to KE Arms. The difference is that it is not about actual technology it is about being dishonest in business dealings and breaking signed contracts.

Not being a lawyer but using reasonable thinking skills some of the questions the court is being asked to resolve are:
1.) Did KE Arms purchase IP from Shawn Nealon?
2.) Was that IP part of the original sale to Phagan?
3.) Was that IP then part of the sale to GWACS?
4.) Did KE Arms use any of that IP for the development of the KP-15?
5.) Did Phagan know about Shawn Nealon having IP that belonged to GWACS?
6.) Did Phagan facilitate any part of the sale between Shawn Nealon and KE Arms?
7.) Did Phagan break any portion of the NDA and other contracts he had with GWACS?
8.) Did KE Arms break any portion of the contract it had between itself and GWACS?
9.) Did Brownells break any portion of its contract it had between itself and GWACS?

Also, remember one thing. GWACS is very specific in that it was 2 boxes of blueprints and a thumb drive containing IP. They are also very specific about the purchase price. Exactly $1,000 and $9,000 of firearm accessories. In my humble view this means a witness to these things is available.

My part? My part is the same as every KF poster in every KF post. What part do you have in Chris Chandler threads? What do you have to do with anything you post in?
 
Karl is doing that to show the absurdity of the product, he has an awkward-funny sense of humor I assume. Karl is knowledgeable and can be funny, but he gets way to serious about his beliefs (preachy) which can kill the mood for a lot of people. I would watch him review ridiculous tacticool gear any day though.
Sometimes you can't tell if he's using humor to hide his sperging.
 
What the fuck did you just fucking say about me, you little bitch? I'll have you know I graduated top of my class in the Navy Seals, and I've been involved in numerous secret raids on Al-Quaeda, and I have over 300 confirmed kills. I am trained in gorilla warfare and I'm the top sniper in the entire US armed forces. You are nothing to me but just another target. I will wipe you the fuck out with precision the likes of which has never been seen before on this Earth, mark my fucking words. You think you can get away with saying that shit to me over the Internet? Think again, fucker. As we speak I am contacting my secret network of spies across the USA and your IP is being traced right now so you better prepare for the storm, maggot. The storm that wipes out the pathetic little thing you call your life. You're fucking dead, kid. I can be anywhere, anytime, and I can kill you in over seven hundred ways, and that's just with my bare hands. Not only am I extensively trained in unarmed combat, but I have access to the entire arsenal of the United States Marine Corps and I will use it to its full extent to wipe your miserable ass off the face of the continent, you little shit. If only you could have known what unholy retribution your little "clever" comment was about to bring down upon you, maybe you would have held your fucking tongue. But you couldn't, you didn't, and now you're paying the price, you goddamn idiot. I will shit fury all over you and you will drown in it. You're fucking dead, kiddo.
I've already posted that one twice.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: WhoBusTank69
I still think the worst GunTuber by far is Tim Harmsen since his videos are mostly fear-mongering to drum up sales. Him pulling the "muh antisemen-tism" card when called out for alleged partiality towards IWI products was pretty funny though. IWI does make high-quality firearms (other than the gimped Uzi PRO), so there isn't much to complain about.

Now I'm caught up in speculation....like which distro would Karl shill the hardest? Is there a WWSD analogue in all the project forks?
He claims to be an "Infosec professional" so he probably would be one of those goobers who installs Kali on bare metal
 
The civil court system allows anyone to accuse anyone else of anything and it takes hundreds of thousands of dollars and years to resolve.

I’m sure redicart will get around to putting the same effort into analyzing our motions that are already filed and our motions for summary judgment once discovery is closed.
 
In response to some reviews that complained about the cost of the WWSD and the CDR (they both have expensive premium parts) I listed the cheapest complete rifle we could possibly build using the KP-15 lower.

Under 6 pounds, under $600.00


Perfect for slaying your choice of decommissioned appliances in the woods, desert, or gravel pit.
 
In response to some reviews that complained about the cost of the WWSD and the CDR (they both have expensive premium parts) I listed the cheapest complete rifle we could possibly build using the KP-15 lower.

Under 6 pounds, under $600.00


Perfect for slaying your choice of decommissioned appliances in the woods, desert, or gravel pit.
Not gonna lie, I'm getting some Demolition Ranch vibes out of that one. No idea why.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Pocket Dragoon
Weird intersection with AKBro and Nicky Rackets

1651120387497-png.3225341


Some tidbits (I know of Herrera, don't really watch him I'm an AR guy)

He fangirls for Nick ever since Rittenhouse
He was approached by some lawyer representing the widower of the woman Alec Baldwin shot
He apparently once went to law school
They might will be going over the Alec Baldwin interview
 
Last edited:
I guess things should be broken down. Cavalry Arms sold all its intellectual property to Phagan. Phagan then sold all of that intellectual property to GWACS. Phagan was employed by all three companies by the way. Phagan is at KE Arms and KE Arms goes to the owner of Cavalry Arms and purchases blueprints and intellectual property. In GWACS lawsuit they are quite explicit about what was purchased from Nealon and how much was paid for it, $1,000 in cash and $9,000 in firearms accessories. Oh, and that Phagan assisted KE Arms in the development of the KP-15 with knowledge that he had no right to share. Then something about trademark infringements etc and broken contracts.

The allegations are that Phagan, Brownells, and KE Arms sign contracts that they are not wiling to live up too. GWACS is claiming that Phagan lied to them when he sold them the intellectual property. They are also claiming that Phagan broke his non-disclosure agreement when he left his employment with GWACS and went to KE Arms. The difference is that it is not about actual technology it is about being dishonest in business dealings and breaking signed contracts.

Not being a lawyer but using reasonable thinking skills some of the questions the court is being asked to resolve are:
1.) Did KE Arms purchase IP from Shawn Nealon?
2.) Was that IP part of the original sale to Phagan?
3.) Was that IP then part of the sale to GWACS?
4.) Did KE Arms use any of that IP for the development of the KP-15?
5.) Did Phagan know about Shawn Nealon having IP that belonged to GWACS?
6.) Did Phagan facilitate any part of the sale between Shawn Nealon and KE Arms?
7.) Did Phagan break any portion of the NDA and other contracts he had with GWACS?
8.) Did KE Arms break any portion of the contract it had between itself and GWACS?
9.) Did Brownells break any portion of its contract it had between itself and GWACS?

Also, remember one thing. GWACS is very specific in that it was 2 boxes of blueprints and a thumb drive containing IP. They are also very specific about the purchase price. Exactly $1,000 and $9,000 of firearm accessories. In my humble view this means a witness to these things is available.

My part? My part is the same as every KF poster in every KF post. What part do you have in Chris Chandler threads? What do you have to do with anything you post in?
The interesting part about questions 8 and 9 is exactly when and in what capacity Russel was working with Ian and Karl on the WWSD project. If the allegation from GWACS is true the WWSD project's inception could have easily been a result of Russel trying to generate interest in polymer lowers. The WWSD rifle existed in 2010 (see his blog post) with the only large difference being barrel profile and buffer before IRTV ever existed. It even had a no forward assist upper! Karl and Ian were also invovled with promoting the cav arms lowers before they were even IRTV, interestingly the cav arms torture test video was deleted on youtube (you can infer this from the tfbtv article linking to a deleted video). Too bad Russel can't tell us why. Looks like he also forgot to delete it on gunstream (I gave him a tip earlier in the threadto delete it.) You'll see Karl and if you look closely, Ian as well circa 2014, before IRTV's existence during Russel's employment at GWACS.

This means that Karl and Ian were involved with promoting Russel's lowers before WWSD and IRTV existed. Karl was also at the match where the exploded 2010 WWSD forerunner exploded, and was at Tiger valley in 2009 shooting these polymer lowers, so Karl and Ian aren't able to truly say that the WWSD rifle is their idea. Seeing as how Russel left GWACS for KEA in the middle of 2015 and GWACS alleges he violated IP NDAs in February 2016 you can look at the first WWSD announcement video from April 2017 where Ian and Karl state that there's been "a lot of work... and a long time in the making" in the first minute of the video. How long is "a long time in the making" and how is there a lot of work when Karl would have already seen the WWSD clone back from 2010 and I'm sure karl would have spoken with Russel who could have filled him in on this similar build? Perhaps he's referring to Russel's alleged IP theft in a larger scheme for Karl and Ian to promote a rifle that GWACS wasn't able to manufacture anymore. Maybe Russel had foreseen this inability to make more and that's why he changed companies? It would be pretty interesting if the WWSD project was intiated by Russel as a way to monetize the IP he had been trying to get off the ground for years. What were Russel's words again... (see the end of his blogpost on cav 15 history) "What is the future of the CAV-15 Receiver? As long as I’m alive the concept of a CAV-15 style receiver is not dead. Be patient and stay tuned…" Hmm I wonder if he had this allegation in mind when he used those words.
 
Last edited:
FullSpectrum regarding videos being deleted from YouTube and not from Gunstreamer; YouTube itself has deleted my videos over the years due to their ever evolving TOS or because something got them flagged. If there are videos up on gunstreamer that aren’t on YouTube that is why; they don’t have the same TOS or never got flagged the same way.

You also should be aware that deleting anything after litigation has started can have drastically worse legal consequences. So as to your warning to delete something else earlier here, No I’m not deleting anything.

All of my blog posts, videos, and comments have already been entered into evidence during discovery. Including these:


Edit: I would particularly direct your attention towards the bottom of this article:

 
Last edited:
Back