- Joined
- Jan 3, 2017
I've always liked the idea of a solar backups but I've also heard the solar backups don't work very well.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thanks for tickling that unpleasant memory. I've had a distrust of solar trickle-charging ever since, especially since they don't even seem to work on radios or flashlights.I've always liked the idea of a solar backups but I've also heard the solar backups don't work very well.
The issue with solar panels is that cheap solar panels wear out very quickly, frankly I think that a decent fiber optic set up is better but there isn't anything wrong with a decently built solar panel, they've come quite a long ways in the past ten years or so.I've always liked the idea of a solar backups but I've also heard the solar backups don't work very well.
Choice of lube also plays a big part, personally I'd look at industrial moly lubes such as Dow molykote 33 since that one is temperature rated and tested from -100F up to 400F, a lot of firearms specific lubricants just aren't tested for that kind of thing. Another tip that I'll give is to make sure you do everything within your power to cover up any moving part of the firearm and keep snow off of it, any sort of water-condensation, vapor, snow, you name it-that gets on your rifle becomes water and then turns back into ice, which then plays hell with your weapon until you get it to melt again. What I'd really like to see is GT do this test again but with as many identical rifles as he can scrounge up but each using a different lube.https://youtube.com/watch?v=LbjpIP5ShH0
Sig Fanboys on suicide watch
Joking aside, i think videos like this and the one made by Kalashnikov Group show that it pays off diversifying your loadout.
nothing beats my 10.5" AR with adjustable gas system and A5 buffer kit when it comes to recoil management and ease of handling, but when the temperatures drop too much i'm not deluding myself into thinking it'll cycle reliably. Glad i scooped up a nice MKK-104 when i had the chance
https://youtube.com/watch?v=gz0xuovGcQA@SinistralRifleman did you guys do any testing on the solar power feature itself?
I've always liked the idea of a solar backups but I've also heard the solar backups don't work very well.
Different lubes or maybe different magazines as he did note magazines failing before some of the rifles. Maybe a comparison between the performance of polymer, steel and aluminum in extreme cold weather.The issue with solar panels is that cheap solar panels wear out very quickly, frankly I think that a decent fiber optic set up is better but there isn't anything wrong with a decently built solar panel, they've come quite a long ways in the past ten years or so.
Choice of lube also plays a big part, personally I'd look at industrial moly lubes such as Dow molykote 33 since that one is temperature rated and tested from -100F up to 400F, a lot of firearms specific lubricants just aren't tested for that kind of thing. Another tip that I'll give is to make sure you do everything within your power to cover up any moving part of the firearm and keep snow off of it, any sort of water-condensation, vapor, snow, you name it-that gets on your rifle becomes water and then turns back into ice, which then plays hell with your weapon until you get it to melt again. What I'd really like to see is GT do this test again but with as many identical rifles as he can scrounge up but each using a different lube.
That would also be a very interesting test, although that's another one that I'd be more willing to chalk up to magazine handling rather than magazine material. It's really easy to get water into a magazine and a magazine isn't going to deice itself by getting hot the same way a rifle is capable of.Different lubes or maybe different magazines as he did note magazines failing before some of the rifles. Maybe a comparison between the performance of polymer, steel and aluminum in extreme cold weather.
I snickered when the Sig failed, that was dampened a little when the KAC followed it. The test is evidence for why the AK platform is still relevant and why some of the features that allow ARs to be so 'high speed' like the mag catch and safety can hurt them in extreme circumstances. Makes a lot more sense to me now why some Alaskan PDs adopted AKs and why the Russians aren't holding on to it just because of economic concerns.I knew this was gonna be a good video just by all the seething KAC fanboys on FB.
I wouldn't go so far as to call it a cope personally seeing as a bad lube or bad lube job can kneecap a rifle's reliability in any environment, but I think that people should realize that certain designs do work better in hostile environments than others. The AK is just a damned good cold weather rifle, but improper lubrication or handling can fuck up an AK too, it's just generally more permissive towards that sort of thing than the majority of other platforms.The common comeback(or cope) between everyone defending their favorite rifle is lubrication. But I don't think tailoring each one to best survive the test was the point of the video. It was a test of what would happen if you took the average well used rifle off the rack/armory and into harsh winter conditions, and it succeeded at that.
Neither the AR or AK surprised me but I will say the AUG and the M14 surprised me for completely opposite reasons.I snickered when the Sig failed, that was dampened a little when the KAC followed it. The test is evidence for why the AK platform is still relevant and why some of the features that allow ARs to be so 'high speed' like the mag catch and safety can hurt them in extreme circumstances. Makes a lot more sense to me now why some Alaskan PDs adopted AKs and why the Russians aren't holding on to it just because of economic concerns.
The common comeback(or cope) between everyone defending their favorite rifle is lubrication. But I don't think tailoring each one to best survive the test was the point of the video. It was a test of what would happen if you took the average well used rifle off the rack/armory and into harsh winter conditions, and it succeeded at that.
@AGPinochet ninja'd you bud.Apparently James Yeager might be dying of ALS. probably true because he has been slurring his words and weakly moving for months.
![]()
I might have ALS
JOIN this channel to get access to perks:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCh6iq_mOy33ZPp2EMhqQOeA/joinMy AMAZON Store: https://www.amazon.com/shop/jamesyeage...www.youtube.com
I guess those ice bucket challenges didn't help ALS after all lol.Buck Angel might have ALS
![]()
I might have ALS
JOIN this channel to get access to perks:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCh6iq_mOy33ZPp2EMhqQOeA/joinMy AMAZON Store: https://www.amazon.com/shop/jamesyeage...youtu.be
Someone pointed out that cold weather operability was a major priority for the AUG, hence the snow glove hand guard.Neither the AR or AK surprised me but I will say the AUG and the M14 surprised me for completely opposite reasons.
in the original M14 trials the t44 (M14) outperformed the FAL in arctic conditions. The T48 (FAL) was not prepared to work in the cold. FN engineers tried to fix it on site but were unable. The M14's violent action broke and flung ice out of the action.Someone pointed out that cold weather operability was a major priority for the AUG, hence the snow glove hand guard.
M14 just seems to be crap at everything.