My favorite thing about that Q&A was how they talked about how if you find a machine gun in the proverbial attic you should totally go to the ATF because if it's actually on the registry they'll help you out, and if it's not they won't prosecute you for doing the right thing... And didn't even slightly mention that 'the right thing' would result in them taking it from you.
Nigga, did you even watch the video or are you just parroting the same talking points from those schizos who are obsessed with Ian on /k/? This one's been beaten like a dead horse so much that they don't even bring this up on /k/ anymore.
I watched the video quite some time ago and came up with the conclusion myself. Don't go on /k/, what was that a meme there?
They all seem like pretty good reasons for these people to own gun imo.
If I'm remembering correctly they were dancing around the issue and saying what they were supposed to.
That's just how I remember it. I just thought it was setting up people to be upset. Like the most likely outcome is the thing gets taken, prepare people for that at least. I get you can't go BECOME UNGOVERNABLE REEEE on youtube, of course.
Yeah, I mean that's what I would do.
Karl should.
As much as we very deservedly rag on Karl here, that would be interesting, and I think he'd want to do it.
That's one thing I give him credit for. He doesn't suck Susan's minge like a lot of leftists do. He does seem to actually hate youtube censorship of gun content.
It'll be interesting to see what the reaction to this video is. On the one hand, Karl is a fag who obviously fixed the results somehow to make a rifle he doesn't like fail. On the other however, the Army can't do anything right and has obviously picked the wrong rifle to adopt.
It's less he fixed the results and just more pouting mud directly into any gun's ejection port is going to cause problems.
The reaction to this video from people who actually understand these "mud tests" should be the same as every other: that these videos are infotainment at most and not to be taken seriously. They're good at modeling very specific debris-related failure modes, but they're not realistic to the day to day operation of the guns, even in heavy mud conditions like Ukraine's rasputitsa/bezdorizhzhia. Not by any stretch. Most mud doesn't get poured onto the rifle from above, then patted down onto it, and then diluted further with water from above to make sure it gets everywhere. The guns are also usually cleaned in some way by the operators because you'll notice if you can't even reach the safety on your rifle through the dirt.
This is the kind of content I like seeing him make.
Sure, and these aren't scientific tests in the least, but I'll always be a smug little fag about how a good old Colt SP1 passed this ridiculous and unscientific mud test with flying colors.
