Generation Z can't work alongside people with different views and don't have the skills to debate. - Says Channel 4 boss as she cites the pandemic as the main cause of the workplace challenge.

Young people in the workplace don't have the skills to debate, disagree and work alongside people with different opinions, Channel 4's chief executive has said.

Speaking at the Royal Television Society's Cambridge Convention, Alex Mahon said 'particularly post-pandemic' Gen Z youngsters 'haven't got the skills to discuss' and 'haven't got the skills to disagree'.

She said this phenomenon, which was being seen in the workplace, was a 'dangerous step change'.

The Channel 4 boss cited the time youngsters had spent 'being out of colleges' during the pandemic, meaning they had not been exposed as much to 'people with a difference of opinion'.

Gen Z usually refers to people born between the middle to late 1990s and the early 2010s.

Ms Mahon told the Royal Television Society Cambridge Convention: 'What we are seeing with young people who come into the workplace - particularly post pandemic - with this concentration of short form content [short videos on services like Tik Tok and YouTube] is they haven't got the skills to debate things.

'They haven't got the skills to discuss, they haven't got the skills to disagree and commit because they haven't been raised, particularly with being out of colleges to have those kind of debates, to get to the point where you've got people with a difference of opinion to you and you're happy to work alongside that, and that is a really dangerous step change in my view that we are seeing.'

Last year Channel 4 carried out research which showed these youngsters are less tolerant of others' views than their parents or grandparents.

The study found that young people could therefore be said to be 'less liberal' than their elders. The research branded this phenomenon as the 'rise of the Young Illiberal Progressives' or 'Yips'.

During Ms Mahon's appearance at the event she unveiled new research which showed that many 'associate their short form social media consumption with feeling a lack of control'.

It was added: 'When the algorithm is in charge, people say they feel emotionally out of control - the immediate dopamine-hit fades rapidly and they are left feeling empty.'

It added that it gave them a sense that their lives had been 'encroached upon'.

The research said viewers in Britain felt 'anxious about video overload'.

People watch over five hours per day 'and the video day is lengthening', Ms Mahon revealed, adding that 'short-form viewing has piled on to long form viewing, and gaming has piled in on top of both'.

 
People have this weird hard-on for "debating", and hold it up as some kind of intellectual gold standard when in practice (especially online) it's just retards screaming at each other. Keep that shit out of my job, I'm not here to debate politics, I'm here to ignore it and finish this financial report so I can go home.

Reminds me of a time where I was listening on this like Gen Z Asian college career panel on Zoom during lockdowns, and one of the panelists literally would not stop going into tangents about white people stereotypes during every question as if he had some sort of massive hate-boner for whitey and just needed validation on how much he was right. He was so goddamn insufferable, if I ever saw this guy apply for an job at my company I would've personally rejected him at the resume stage.
 
Most of these people don't actually want to "debate" their positions. That is what they call it, but what they actually do is closer to proselytizing their Liberal Superior Future or lecturing you on why they are more virtuous than you. That is why their "debates" quickly derail into long winded speeches and attacks and tangents: they don't give the slightest shit what you think, they are only looking for a opening to speak and for you to be forced to listen.
 
It's not just genz. Is the previous two as well. A friend of mine has to constantly babysit millennials at a car dealership because some will become angry if the customer has a trump bumper sticker. One allegedly was kicking chairs around the break room because his customer had trump stickers.
 
We're not even pretending the great marketplace of ideas exists anymore, lol, lmao.
Just like those indoctrinating them, they'd rather invent new words and new definitions than ever entertain an independent thought.

Exhibit A, from the Guardian:
Screenshot_20230921_110422_Brave.jpg

Anyone who uses the term "bothsidesism" is dangerous. They are admitting that they're too stupid and arrogant to ever admit that they could be wrong.

Like others have said, they don't want debate. They don't want to have their beliefs tested or scrutinized. They want to talk *at* you, not *with* you.

This isn't limited to Zoomers, of course, but Zoomers are the ones eating tide pods and faking mental illnesses because it's "quirky".
 
People have this weird hard-on for "debating", and hold it up as some kind of intellectual gold standard when in practice (especially online) it's just retards screaming at each other.
*unrelated file photo of Destiny being turned away from a "you must be this tall to ride the rollercoaster" sign*
It's not just genz. Is the previous two as well. A friend of mine has to constantly babysit millennials at a car dealership because some will become angry if the customer has a trump bumper sticker. One allegedly was kicking chairs around the break room because his customer had trump stickers.
God damn. I hate bumper stickers and that makes me want to put the Don on my car.
 
I used to put a lot of effort into work-related debates. Research, contacting experts for their opinions, writing persuasive emails. But then I learned most managers don't actually want input from their subordinates and I'm actually endangering my position by advocating for things like standards compliance and "stop lying about this." So I'm with Generation Z here. If someone at work disagrees with you, let them do whatever. In a few years they'll leave, or you will. Until then, keep your mouth shut and try not to actively cause any damage. As I have heard a few times, "first do no harm," with an implied "there is no second."
 
I think it's not that they "can't debate", it's that they won't debate. They can't work with someone who holds differing political/moral views. They can't work alongside them and discuss civilly--they can't debate because there is no debate. This gun loving transphobic MAGAtard Boomer or Gen Xer (Zoomer knows that person is this because they haven't personally cancelled Harry Potter/JK Rowling)
won't agree to change their entire outlook, therefore Zoomer can't work with them.
T. Zoomer

I will be honest, I have held a very different experience as a more conservative Zoomer. From my experience, most old people are just as pozzed. College is an obvious example as professors discourage any real discussion in favor of ego stroking. The school will force you through racism tests where you have to explain why you are a bigot to the teacher. No seriously, that was my college introductory class.

I work part time at a library, which is far from conservative. I had to go through a county presentation last week which was just a large “Republican Bad!” session, discussion/ compromise was shut down whenever brought up. Even in every day functions there are Boomers who wonder around and start political debates after reading Fox/CNN article of the day.

I take the won’t debate stance, and I am guessing many conservatives Zoomers do as the system at large doesn’t favor them.
 
Last edited:
So what this article is referring that many of the Zoomers are Socially Retarded.

Well... Yea... God I've seen this first hand about how awkward this generation is.

And it blows their mind that I like Drake. Kayne, Aggressive Phonk... etc

And I will crank this up to their surprise.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Lady Bizness
The only thing gen-Z need in the workplace is someone more senior than them to sit them down and tell them "No one here gives a fuck about your faggot ideas. Keep them to yourself. We are here to work, not to do discussion club. Going forward, you will keep your mouth shut and focus on doing your job. If BOB, your senior peer happen to have a different opinion than you? that is too fucking bad. You shut the fuck up and deal with it. Will this be a problem?"
 
"no one here gives a fuck about your faggot ideas. Keep them to yourself. We are here to work, not to do discussion club. Going forward, you will keep your mouth shut and do your job. If BOB, your senior peer happen to have a different opinion than you, to fucking bad. You shut the fuck up and deal with it. Will this be a problem?"
This is in essence the speech I usually give the new guys. I only once ran into issues with HR because of it. The asshole who complained? A fucking zoomer. Of course...
 
Back