That old trucker's sperg overlooks something, specifically certain possibilities of terminal failure or "managed decline" or whatever you want to call it. He's sort of assuming that everything will continue balls-to-the-wall and it'll just cost more and take longer, everyone will do their best, and certainly in the short term he seems to be correct.
In in the slightly longer term however, since he says there's essentially nothing to be done about it anyway, nothing that'll take less than several years and tons of investment if it ever gets done at all, I would expect to see a shift to simply having less product capacity overall. That is, less stuff. Less variety of stuff. Less actual manufacturing, translating into less shipping. Think about the abundance of shit we've gotten used to. Every corner has a retail operation stocking a huge variety of products, even in bumfuck towns. There's so much waste, even crappy products don't see use until the end of their (short) service lives.
I think that in the long run, assuming he's right and there's not a practical solution to the keep the wheels of consumption rolling as fast as they used to, there'll just be less stuff. This would also entail a holocaust in retail (and certain affiliates of retail) as they have to pare their operations back and only stock 3 kinds of chinese shirt instead of 10. The JIT and lean systems will probably have to be curtailed and stock warehoused again to keep common goods regularly available - imagine the losses those companies will post on paper (aka the stock market)? Honestly thinking about it makes me feel good but the reality is that this kind of event will probably occur right alongside (or even inseparably from) a massive economic depression... hmm.