- Joined
- Jul 18, 2019
Just finished putting together a home theater PC with a 4060 and man.... it's so refreshing to work with a GPU that isn't some 3-slot monster and doesn't immediately heat my room by several degrees when I use it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A home theater PC with a 4060?Just finished putting together a home theater PC with a 4060 and man.... it's so refreshing to work with a GPU that isn't some 3-slot monster and doesn't immediately heat my room by several degrees when I use it.
Discussed here, looks like it will do some gaming too. I suggested getting a 75W card but the 4060 has much better performance and 8 GB VRAM at a pretty low TDP with single-slot designs. Though a search will bring up lots of headlines for GALAX's single-slot 4060 Ti 16GB.A home theater PC with a 4060?What's it doing that an integrated GPU couldn't do? Or do you have more money than sense?
The other thing that's nice about the 4060 is you can get it in a low-profile/SFF configuration and throw it in almost anything. I've even considered picking one up to build a small gaming/media PC to stick under my television when I don't feel like sitting at my desk.
I'm also re-using an F-sku CPU from a previous system in it so I need some kind of GPU.A home theater PC with a 4060?What's it doing that an integrated GPU couldn't do? Or do you have more money than sense?
I'm glad that that public ire mostly seems to be centered on Krzanich rather than Gelsinger. Gelsinger has his faults sure, but he's not the reason why Intel is in the position it's in. That rot set in more than a decade ago when BK's business strategy turned out to be, "snub our biggest customer, overextend the company, make no advances in process nodes, simp for china, and cheat on my wife."
That's pretty encouraging tbh. Fairly strong indication of how dedicated to price-cutting they are. Definitely feels like another Polaris moment. My only real criticism is that them sitting on it until next year so they can sell more RDNA3 stock seems like a bad idea if they're trying to build marketshare.
AMD’s next-gen Navi 44 GPU package said to be 29x29mm in size, smaller than Navi 23/33
We'll see. Even with the silicon locked in, they can choose to do some interesting things with RDNA4, or disappointing things. The picture is becoming clearer but we need confirmation on some of these details. Like is Navi 44 128-bit or 192-bit, and closer to 30 or 40 CUs?That's pretty encouraging tbh. Fairly strong indication of how dedicated to price-cutting they are. Definitely feels like another Polaris moment.
Fire sale them and all is forgiven. Also, the 7650 GRE could be AMD's way of dumping extra Navi 33 onto the Chinese market.My only real criticism is that them sitting on it until next year so they can sell more RDNA3 stock seems like a bad idea if they're trying to build marketshare.
It's supposed to be on a TSMC N4 node (N4C?) instead of N6, and a 31% smaller package doesn't necessarily mean a 31% smaller die size (someone claimed previous packages had wasted space).There is the AMD we all know and love![]()
I think they won't do it. However, they could soften the blow by keeping the clock speeds on both CCDs the same, making it a little easier to manage.I hope the 9950X3D has vcache on both CCDs otherwise Zen 5 is just looking like a disappointing writeoff
It's intentional, not ironic. Looks like a production cut.What is more ironic is that the 7800X3D has either run out of stock or has gotten extremely expensive once Zen 5 fell flat on its face. So now future buyers are stuck with just the 9800X3D and other X3D variants.
Great, so if my 7800X3D finally dies due to time, I'm stuck with buying its retarded little brother.It's intentional, not ironic. Looks like a production cut.
The 9800X3D will probably raise clock speeds (at least turbo) by a few hundred MHz to look faster compared to the 7800X3D. So people who end up buying it for $400 instead of 7800X3D for $300 will feel a little better about it. A year later, cheap 9900X3Ds could look good if clock speeds end up the same on both CCDs.
If Zen 5 is cheaper to make than Zen 4, pricing could recover quickly.
I don't see the 9800X3D being a worse option in any scenario. Maybe in efficiency sometimes. Most Zen 5 to Zen 4 performance regressions were probably a TDP thing or fixed with newer BIOS and OS patches.Great, so if my 7800X3D finally dies due to time, I'm stuck with buying its retarded little brother.
AMD has kind of shot themselves in the foot with the whole X3D thing, it doesn't make sense for gamers to go with non vcache chips, only the X900X SKUs make sense for production workloadsWhat is more ironic is that the 7800X3D has either run out of stock or has gotten extremely expensive once Zen 5 fell flat on its face. So now future buyers are stuck with just the 9800X3D and other X3D variants.
It shouldn't just die unless you're massively overvolting it. CPUs are generally the most reliable part. Personally I've never experienced a CPU failure with my home machines or anywhere I've worked. I've seen every other component die, even those LSI SAS HBAs have totally crapped out on me, but CPUs aren't a wear part the same way an SSD is and seem to have better quality manufacturing than the piece of shit DDR3 modules dying in my old servers.Great, so if my 7800X3D finally dies due to time, I'm stuck with buying its retarded little brother.
And then budget gamers should fuck off to the older AM4 socket which is perfectly fine (especially 5700X3D at ~$200) or loot a cheap Intel system right out of some company's offices.AMD has kind of shot themselves in the foot with the whole X3D thing, it doesn't make sense for gamers to go with non vcache chips, only the X900X SKUs make sense for production workloads
Don't forget, "redirect $300m fron R&D to diversity.""snub our biggest customer, overextend the company, make no advances in process nodes, simp for china, and cheat on my wife."
it doesn't make sense for gamers to go with non vcache chips
Unfortunately PC gamers (or reviewers at least) have convinced themelves that 200fps is a desirable target.I don't think there is a desktop CPU on the market that becomes the bottleneck in current games below 100 fps.
What kind of workloads do you foresee needing the GPU for? Cause if it's just video encoding, you might be better off sticking with integrated graphics or grabbing an Arc card.So I still have this i7 12700k, 32 gigs of ddr4, and a cooler from building my PC. The parts just accumulated. Also got a random case from a thrift store. Thinking of building a server tbh. Just load it with SSD's or hard drives for media storage. Put like a 4060 in it for the graphics. Thoughts?