GPUs & CPUs & Enthusiast hardware: Questions, Discussion and fanboy slap-fights - Nvidia & AMD & Intel - Separe but Equal. Intel rides in the back of the bus.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
More cores are better lol. I can say that with certainty with my 12900k. Infinite chrome (well Brave) tabs can be open lmao (assuming you weren't stingy on RAM). That and it keeps pace with the newer generations.
A 5700X3D should be maybe 17% faster than a 5950X in gaming (I'm being lazy with this estimate), and it's probably easier to cool. I can have plenty of tabs open using an old Intel quad-core and 32-64 GB of RAM. If you're talking about opening dozens of new tabs simultaneously to hit 100% CPU usage while they load, I don't usually do that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vecr and Post Reply
A 5700X3D should be maybe 17% faster than a 5950X in gaming (I'm being lazy with this estimate), and it's probably easier to cool. I can have plenty of tabs open using an old Intel quad-core and 32-64 GB of RAM. If you're talking about loading in dozens of new tabs simultaneously to hit 100% CPU usage, I don't usually do that.
I was being a bit facetious. But my point on future proofing remains the same. A 5950x can still keep up with newer core generations. A 5700X3D is kinda just stuck where it is. He also mentioned he got it at a bargain. Can't blame him for going for the 16 core option.
 
However, the cpu seems to want to hang around 90C when I'm playing something, and sometimes when I'm not running games it'll slide back and forth from 40C to 84C. I've ordered a new cooler just in case.
That’s perfectly normal for a 5950X. Modern CPUs will boost as much as they can, which means during load they often sit at their thermal limit, especially high core count models (the 5950X is basically two medium-end processors that have been glued together to produce one high- end chip). And Windows is an unoptimised mess that will randomly load the processor to capacity while idling, even on battery, so seeing it swing between a normal idle temp and the fully loaded temp is expected behaviour.

That’s not to say a cooler upgrade couldn’t squeeze a bit more performance out of the processor for you. Get a 240/280mm (whichever is the largest you can fit in your case) AIO liquid cooler, they’re pretty cheap nowadays and even at their worst will perform on par with a high-end air cooler. The water also holds temperature really well, so if your motherboard has a thermostat port (two pins labelled something like ”temp”) you can get a 2$ thermistor to tape onto the tubes and control the fan speed based on water temperature, meaning that intermittent high/low loads won’t have the fans spin up, making their noise much less noticeable.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Prehistoric Jazz
Yeah I'm not seeing any performance issues, I just want to err on the side of caution and make sure nothing becomes an issue. I was playing Helldivers II and it was buttery smooth democracy all the way through. The Adrenaline overlay said it was sticking to 60fps and I think that's incorrect; I set the limiter to 90 (monitor is 100mhz) and it was visibly improved over the previous 60 setting.
 
240W is a lot of power to shove through such a low gauge wire. I have my reservations.
Looks like the 240W spec for USB is 48V and 5A. Which really only needs 22AWG wire, 24AWG if you're using 2 conductors(plus ground). 20AWG for longer distances.
 
Looks like the 240W spec for USB is 48V and 5A. Which really only needs 22AWG wire, 24AWG if you're using 2 conductors(plus ground). 20AWG for longer distances.
The 12VHPWR cable is also technically in spec for delivering the amount of power it carries but in the real world a lot of these connectors just aren't robust enough for it. I'd be really worried about such a cable wearing down and eventually melting.

I really feel like if we're going to be using USB-C for all this shit, we need some kind of extension to the standard that lets us firmly lock the connector into the receptacle.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vecr
I really feel like if we're going to be using USB-C for all this shit, we need some kind of extension to the standard that lets us firmly lock the connector into the receptacle.
We need like a bigger, more durable connector. maybe something like this, but with little latches to help secure the connector? It could even have extra pins for things like video out.
1743989861619.png
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Brain Problems
I really feel like if we're going to be using USB-C for all this shit, we need some kind of extension to the standard that lets us firmly lock the connector into the receptacle.
They are trying to do 480W through USB-B.
  • HDMI 2.1 TMDS (18Gbps / no power)
  • HDMI 2.1 FRL (48Gbps / no power)
  • DisplayPort 2.1 UHBR20 (80Gbps / 240W Power)
  • GPMI Type-C (96Gbps / 240W power)
  • GPMI Type-B (192Gbps / 480W power)
USB-3.0-Typ-B-Stecker_--_2014_--_1709s.jpg
 
i loved having to screw in the connectors, it made it seem like a big deal,
AUI and the clip retention was a mistake. SCSI/Centronics and their clips were a little better at least. I think V.35 were the best uncommon one I had to deal with very often.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vecr
The 12VHPWR cable is also technically in spec for delivering the amount of power it carries but in the real world a lot of these connectors just aren't robust enough for it. I'd be really worried about such a cable wearing down and eventually melting.

I really feel like if we're going to be using USB-C for all this shit, we need some kind of extension to the standard that lets us firmly lock the connector into the receptacle.
The 4090 really could have been a 300 watt card.
 
Back