Grammar and language issues that drive you utterly berserk - Pet peeves

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Have you ever noticed how some Black people enunciate the letter "r" in a weird way? Typically, you would say "r" like arr as a pirate. Some Black people say it like "R-rah," I don't know how to express it. You know how you'd say "aura;" it's that with emphasis for the ending sound.
 
The contraction "ain't" is accepted as informal speech as a substitute for "is not" or "am not." I should not see that in written form.

Now, I can accept Southern speech/dialect as AAVE, but Internet slang is where I draw the line. I would see ridiculous words and terms that originated from zoomer culture coopted from urban hoodrats. Or the other way around, I don't know.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dead76
This doesn't exactly drive me berserk but the communication of intent and description is very dependant on sentence structure and is so subtle that most people don't notice it explicitly. For example
I'm a friend of X
X is my friend
Both mean the same thing, describing a relationship, but the first sentence indicates egotism cause the emphasis is on I while the second indicates humility cause the emphasis is on X.
I can't think of many other instances like this but you'll know it when you see it, the sentence structure will help you judge character intent and whatnot combined with body language. Or I guess it's just extreme autism.

Also idk if this counts as grammar but the difference in English names from states and Britain. Stephen in Britain becomes Steven in the states et al. I don't know where it comes from there's only a handful of instances, I don't remember the others right now, and it seems to be a trend from the past 40 years cause Americans had British names before that. It's also not the case of anglicizing names like in the case of Spain (Roberto Robert), slav (Alexei Alex) or Jewish (-vitch -wicz).

Edit: Bryan and Brian maybe another one, Bryan is American Brian is British.
 
Last edited:
This doesn't exactly drive me berserk but the communication of intent and description is very dependant on sentence structure and is so subtle that most people don't notice it explicitly. For example
I'm a friend of X
X is my friend
IMO, the first sentence would be use for a formal setting. The second one would be informal, casual, or even childish.

Ex. I'm a friend of John's. I'd say that in a formal party.
 
This doesn't exactly drive me berserk but the communication of intent and description is very dependant on sentence structure and is so subtle that most people don't notice it explicitly. For example
I'm a friend of X
X is my friend
Both mean the same thing, describing a relationship, but the first sentence indicates egotism cause the emphasis is on I while the second indicates humility cause the emphasis is on X.
You're overthinking it.
Also idk if this counts as grammar but the difference in English names from states and Britain. Stephen in Britain becomes Steven in the states et al. I don't know where it comes from there's only a handful of instances, I don't remember the others right now, and it seems to be a trend from the past 40 years cause Americans had British names before that. It's also not the case of anglicizing names like in the case of Spain (Roberto Robert), slav (Alexei Alex) or Jewish (-vitch -wicz).

Edit: Bryan and Brian maybe another one, Bryan is American Brian is British.
Bryan and Brian are both common in the States, as are both Stephen and Steven.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lowlife Adventures
1704002014410.png

How DO you get Dick from Richard?
 
You're overthinking it.
Probably, I do measure every word in order of magnitude and position before forming sentences. Call me autistic if you want to.
Bryan and Brian are both common in the States, as are both Stephen and Steven.
Steven is there in america but not in Britain even though both are English names, not anglicized variants of foreign names. Same with Bryan. Also Steven and Bryan are more popular now in the states than Stephen and Brian, so theres a time factor in there somewhere, probably owing to amerimutts wanting to separate themselves from britbongs as much as possible.
 
Back