ScaliasGhost
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2021
Imo, I think the DAs real concern with a trial would be Barb. Chris has a right to confront her at a trial. And she is pretty much a necessary witness for their case anyways. DAs really hate putting victims in that position. And victims obviously hate it as well, that is one reason why victims often want a plea deal themselves, so they don't have to testify in court.My guess is though that just from a media standpoint, the last thing any DA or court wants is the insane attention and possible media fiasco attached to The Trial of Chris-Chan. Everything about this is a left leaning advocates dream.
And that's just victims in general. If prosecution calls Barb she might go hostile, and start denying things or saying that it was consensual. (If rumors of her not wanting to talk are true this is a decent possibility). Would she be committing perjury? Yes, but that would be a separate issue. Can they force her to the stand? Yes. They could even threaten her with charges herself if she doesn't want to, since if she did agree to it she is just as culpable for the crime as Chris. But they would want to avoid that situation.
And, even if she is willing to testify on the states behalf there are problems. If she is as dementia ridden as people think, controlling her testimony or getting relevant testimony will be extremely difficult. And if she is lucid? Well, then the possible elder abuse aspects become more difficult for the state. There is a lot more I could get into about the risks of her testimony but those are just some immediate concerns the prosecution might have.