- Joined
- Aug 7, 2018
It's the first GTA game with life simulator elements to it and a focus on customization.Why does everyone love GTA: San Andreas? It's not amusing watching niggers shoot and steal, because they do it all the fucking time.
Also, it's set in 1992, which for a lot of Gen Xers and older Gen Y types, holds a special place in their hearts in terms of being a magical year for them ala how 1967 is to the boomers.
True, GTA: VC was originally conceived as an expansion pack. I feel it's unfair to just dismiss Vice City as a mere expansion pack given the final product. New city, new protagonist, new mechanics, new story, expanded lore, new, LICENSED soundtrack. VC refined what III brought to the table.
I'd add that VC=SA in terms of quality. Both have different high points to them, but both are games that, IMHO, eclipse GTA3 beyond all belief.
I'd personally give the nod to VC over SA purely because of the music; VC has the best of the 80s music scene circa 1986 whereas SA suffers from NONE of the non-rap giants (no Nirvana, Pearl Jam, Metallica, or Madonna) and lesser tracks from major rap acts due to them being cheaper to license than the hits.
CJ's probably the closest the GTA franchise has to a good guy protagonist. He escaped the gang life, only came home after his mom was murdered and he had to attend her funeral/deal with that tragedy, and only fell back into crime for the sort of noble goal of saving his neighborhood from outside forces, traitorous friends, and a corrupt as fuck villain in the form of Samuel L Jackson at his most villainous that were actively harming it and the people living inside of it.SA is mostly the same way, except CJ despite being a hardened gangbanger for some reason has more of a soft spot than the other two and allows a crazy spic to pussywhip him around, developing slight bitch-dependency along the way.
Last edited: