Does anybody know Hasan's defense for why he praised the abduction of random Filipino's? Usually when he starts controversy or say controversial things he or his fans come up with bizarre mental gymnastics to cover for it, but I don't know the defense strategy for that one. For context I'm talking about this.
I am genuinely curious because when ever I saw this I was aghast, and I think it is probably the worst thing he has ever done on stream, and yet, it feels like it never gets brought up by Hasan Haters. I find his fan's brainrot by seeing how they defend some of his more terrible things when they get brought up to shit on Hasan but I have yet to see this one in particular which has always been bizarre to me since praising the literal abduction of innocent people at gun point while watching it happen is probably the most deplorable thing he has ever done.
The content cop got him in the news a bit so I browsed parts of reddit and, again, his seemingly random hatred for Filipinos is evading the minds of his haters, so I was wondering if anybody knows the common talking point for that one. At the time his defense was that it was hurting Israeli trade which is good because Israel is bad but that seems crazy to still use that line of thinking. How many Filipinos is Hasan willing to sacrifice in order to slightly damage the commerce of Israel? (Granted that may be a bigger deal to the Jewish population there, Hall of costs and all that)