Hasan Piker / HasanAbi - Young Turk, Twitch Streamer, Stunlocked Brogressive, Cenk's Nephew, only a socialist for the money

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

More Hasan coping

Plus, he did an interview with Sam Seder:


I know — I’m shocked that Sam Seder still exists, too.
Let's take his argument at face value, to quote: "Hateful bigoted slurs without historical or contemporary oppression are just meanie-bo-beanie words"

For one, there's the obvious hypocrisy here of admitting it's a hateful, bigoted slur while also saying it's just 'meanie-bo-beanie words'. Since when did progressives push racial slurs being on a scale? Isn't the end goal to remove all bigoted, hateful language? Are you saying there is absolutely no history of white people (which is a huge lump of nationalities) having historical or contemporary oppression?

But my real point is: isn't this the beginning of creating that historical/contemporary oppression? All of these slurs that are deemed true slurs by Hasan became that way because people started using them as targeted words to oppress people based on the color of their skin; slurs do not appear over night, it's through their spread and casual use that they become deemed "problematic".

In essence, Hasan is creating the historical context of cracker being a slur in this very moment. Downplaying it and saying it's acceptable due to circumstances is the exact same way nigger, faggot, etc rose in popularity. It's easy to use bigoted language when it's accepted by the general populous, and making a cry that terms such as cracker are okay shares the same origin story of the bigoted slurs he's fighting so hard against. Twitch warned Hasan, people started commenting that it isn't okay, but he doubled down instead. This is the exact way slurs are created and spread. Someone comes up with a blanket term based off of someone's race, uses it against them, and then doubles down that it's acceptable. Simply reducing it to "they are historically more powerful" downplays the human part of this where, the people they are calling cracker aren't the ones with the power.

In short, Hasan is just being racist and pushing the word cracker as inoffensive is more offensive than the word cracker ever was, which is why this outcry and backlash is as big as it is. He's not wrong that most people don't care about the word cracker. What people do care about is the double standard, which has always been on display if you have followed him but is becoming blatantly apparent now more than ever.
 
Last edited:
I think Hasan puts up good content. His reactions are humorous and relatable, and his commentary is always concise yet poignant. Looking forward to his comeback once the ban ends.

Everyone makes mistakes. Let’s not cast stones.
He got exactly what he deserved. The guy embodies leftist hypocrisy and "rules for thee, not for me" rhetoric.
 
Scrolling through tweet threads on this, Hasan's "audience" comes off as a lot of self-hating, young, white adults trying to be hip with reaction gifs featuring black culture and more than ready to take the bullet for being white. I'll never understand these types that get hosed into believing it's their duty to be on the right side of history. Then again, these are the same people that rally behind an unironic millionaire that has had everything handed to him while posing as an advocate for socialism and dismantling capitalism. Not a very bright bunch.
Are you sure they're not Jews? Whenever an anti-White "White" person does this I've found they're Jewish 80% of the time if they're men and 60% of the time if they're women. And when they're White Gentiles they're usually trannies or flaming gay.
 
Let's take his argument at face value, to quote: "Hateful bigoted slurs without historical or contemporary oppression are just meanie-bo-beanie words"

For one, there's the obvious hypocrisy here of admitting it's a hateful, bigoted slur while also saying it's just 'meanie-bo-beanie words'. Since when did progressives push racial slurs being on a scale? Isn't the end goal to remove all bigoted, hateful language? Are you saying there is absolutely no history of white people (which is a huge lump of nationalities) having historical or contemporary oppression?

But my real point is: isn't this the beginning of creating that historical/contemporary oppression? All of these slurs that are deemed true slurs by Hasan became that way because people started using them as targeted words to oppress people based on the color of their skin; slurs do not appear over night, it's through their spread and casual use that they become deemed "problematic".

In essence, Hasan is creating the historical context of cracker being a slur in this very moment. Downplaying it and saying it's acceptable due to circumstances is the exact same way nigger, faggot, etc rose in popularity. It's easy to use bigoted language when it's accepted by the general populous, and making a cry that terms such as cracker are okay shares the same origin story of the bigoted slurs he's fighting so hard against. Twitch warned Hasan, people started commenting that it isn't okay, but he doubled down instead. This is the exact way slurs are created and spread. Someone comes up with a blanket term based off of someone's race, uses it against them, and then doubles down that it's acceptable. Simply reducing it to "they are historically more powerful" downplays the human part of this where, the people they are calling cracker aren't the ones with the power.

In short, Hasan is just being racist and pushing the word cracker as inoffensive is more offensive than the word cracker ever was, which is why this outcry and backlash is as big as it is. He's not wrong that most people don't care about the word cracker. What people do care about is the double standard, which has always been on display if you have followed him but is becoming blatantly apparent now more than ever.
Anti-Racism has always meant being anti-White. Now (((they))) and their useful idiots and bootlickers just being open about it.

Let's call Hasan a roach since Turks aren't oppressed and there's no link to slavery (Roach is a meme from 2013, Turks owned slaves).
 
Let's take his argument at face value, to quote: "Hateful bigoted slurs without historical or contemporary oppression are just meanie-bo-beanie words"

For one, there's the obvious hypocrisy here of admitting it's a hateful, bigoted slur while also saying it's just 'meanie-bo-beanie words'. Since when did progressives push racial slurs being on a scale? Isn't the end goal to remove all bigoted, hateful language? Are you saying there is absolutely no history of white people (which is a huge lump of nationalities) having historical or contemporary oppression?

But my real point is: isn't this the beginning of creating that historical/contemporary oppression? All of these slurs that are deemed true slurs by Hasan became that way because people started using them as targeted words to oppress people based on the color of their skin; slurs do not appear over night, it's through their spread and casual use that they become deemed "problematic".

In essence, Hasan is creating the historical context of cracker being a slur in this very moment. Downplaying it and saying it's acceptable due to circumstances is the exact same way nigger, faggot, etc rose in popularity. It's easy to use bigoted language when it's accepted by the general populous, and making a cry that terms such as cracker are okay shares the same origin story of the bigoted slurs he's fighting so hard against. Twitch warned Hasan, people started commenting that it isn't okay, but he doubled down instead. This is the exact way slurs are created and spread. Someone comes up with a blanket term based off of someone's race, uses it against them, and then doubles down that it's acceptable. Simply reducing it to "they are historically more powerful" downplays the human part of this where, the people they are calling cracker aren't the ones with the power.

In short, Hasan is just being racist and pushing the word cracker as inoffensive is more offensive than the word cracker ever was, which is why this outcry and backlash is as big as it is. He's not wrong that most people don't care about the word cracker. What people do care about is the double standard, which has always been on display if you have followed him but is becoming blatantly apparent now more than ever.
I admire the effort here, but Hasan and his followers are not open to entertaining viewpoints or perspectives that are different from what they already hold. Discourse cannot even begin. Save yourself the headache, write him off as a shifty deceitful turkroach, and disengage.

I liked and agreed with most of your points, but convincing any K-Farmer™ of those isn't difficult. Try to find something to laugh at, it'll be a better use of your time.
 
I admire the effort here, but Hasan and his followers are not open to entertaining viewpoints or perspectives that are different from what they already hold. Discourse cannot even begin. Save yourself the headache, write him off as a shifty deceitful turkroach, and disengage.

I liked and agreed with most of your points, but convincing any K-Farmer™ of those isn't difficult. Try to find something to laugh at, it'll be a better use of your time.
It's not written for Hasan's audience otherwise I would have posted this somewhere where they would read it. I wrote it because I was bored at work and like writing autistic analysis of retards. Appreciate the concern of how I spend my time though, I'm going to go back to laughing at how retarded Hasan is... wait, I was doing that the whole time!
 
Hasan has quite the history of bragging about sleeping with prostitutes, porn stars, and run of the mill streamer cum rags. Also I think he's insinuated he's done a few mfm 3somes, and possibly banged a tranny. It's only a matter of time before he contracts aids and lets nature do the rest of the work.
 
Perhaps the funniest part of this Hyde-Piker fight is that no matter what happens, Hasan still kind of loses.
If Hasan accepts the fight and wins, his fans will say he gave an Alt-Right White Supremacist Nazi Fuck a platform and took his filthy E-money to boot, all while Sam just goes "Hey man, the better fighter clearly won" and goes along his merry way, knowing that the outcome won't affect him or his standing in the long run.
If Hasan accepts the fight and loses, he's a little bitch who lost to Sam "Nick, you just tripped my wife" Hyde, a dude who managed to get kicked off Adult Swim.
And finally, if Hasan ignores the fight offer, he's still a little bitch. Personally, I'm expecting him to pull a RiceGum and accept, only to back out at the last minute unexplained, and never address it again.
 
Back