Hasan Piker / HasanAbi - Young Turk, Twitch Streamer, Stunlocked Brogressive, Cenk's Nephew, only a socialist for the money

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Smart people aren't inherently better at anything and are not credible solely due to their intelligence. It's shit like this that inspires midwits to fellate pedigreed retards for no good reason. A bumfuck farmer with a 80 IQ can have a better take on a topic than a 140 IQ smartypants who graduated from Harvard. This is perhaps the dumbest aspect of the fallacy of appealing to authority, and it's been squarely rejected by most philosophical and religious traditions going back millennia.
Completely and utterly wrong. 80 IQ is so borderline retarded, where you can't safely drive a vehicle. The reason why the bumfuck farmer can have a better take on something is because there is nothing about farming that makes you dumb (anymore than school makes you smart).
IQ is a modern concept and therefor refutation of it doesn't go back millenia.

We like to live in the delusional reality that everybody can bring something valuable to the table, but it is very much possible for one person to be superior to another in every aspect, both physical aspects and mental aspects.

Intelligence is the strongest multiplier of effort in attaining both skills and resources. There are smart people that waste their lives and they are typically the ones to brag about IQ. People instinctively get that they're instead taking a huge L, as not achieving anything if you have good intelligence is a lot worse than if you're not smart enough to attain these things easily, because it means the person is THAT much more lazy or otherwise messed up.

And though appeals to authority are a logical fallacy, we are still going to take the word of authorities on a subject until we have specific reason to doubt it, because you can't sift through every topic and become an expert on every topic.

What separates Vaush and Destiny from terminally online Marxists is also that they support liberal causes without the "but the US can't be involved" shtick. "Why yes, I support gay rights in Saudi Arabia and revolution in Russia-it just needs to be a leninist revolution without Imperialist Americans causing it for imperialist reasons".

I've seen plenty of leftists that alienate themselves from the liberal mainstream with this attitude-mass culture is bad, the state department is bad, the CIA is near demonic Vaush responds with "lol nigga I support liberal causes regardless"-this gives him massive in roads with liberals that don't want to hear about American coups in Latin America or support of dictatorships or how the US is a reactionary force in the world-sure the US has a racist history and all, but we are fundamentally good guys, or getting better.

Vaush doesn't engage in constant "america bad" rhetoric or create fantasy scenarios where "good" social progress happens untainted by say state department backed NGOs or mass media support would lead to some alienated Trot or Maoist sect saying it's all crap. "Uh yeah, overthrow Putin, but it should be Russian workers (presumably under some as of yet uncreated communist party) not American led protesters"

This a perpetually self-defeating and alienating attitude-if you're a leftist in the US, your liberal friends are going to tune you out and you're left to discuss obscure Trot sects or Maoist larping in the void.

Same thing with domestic policy-leftists who go "I support gay rights and tranny-ism just no corporations that capitalist stuff is insincere and reinforces oppression".

I have seen leftists online with this attitude for years. Believe me it does not win them friends amongst normie libs.

Vaush and by extension Hasan and Destiny don't engage in this purity spiraling firing squad of self-induced ghettoization. They make liberals more comfortable with the label "socialist" and online socialists more comfortable cheering for NATO and stanning corporate blockbuster Marvel films.

They support liberalism and globohomo as it actually happens not with some sort of qualifier that it needs a Leninist vanguard party or must drape itself in the label of Marxist or anti Imperialist for it to be not American imperialism or something.

This along with their clear rhetorical training and "hip" presentation is why they have become (regrettably) so popular.

Regarding Mass Culture-bread tubers don't engage in the leftist critiques of "Marvel is brain dead corporate shlock that promotes the US military" and "video games are an opiate of the people that also propagandize the military"-Hollywood is bad, please watch obscure films and read even more obscure books. They like Marvel, they play vidya, they don't come at normie culture with an attitude of condescension or hostility-as a lot of alienated leftists do. This also wins them lots of favor and makes them appear "normal" and within the mainstream.
So what you're saying is that vaush and destiny are what sargon was to spencer? A stepping stone with broader if milder appeal. Kind of makes sense.
 
Last edited:
So what you're saying is that vaush and destiny are what sargon was to spencer? A stepping stone with broader if milder appeal.
I think he's saying they are the corn syrup to snob-socialism's cane sugar. But if you're talking about upheaval-endorsing socialist leftism do you really want the watered-down version where Lenin has a Netflix subscription, uses Reddit on his Macbook and is often found sipping Starbucks? People respond best to new ideas that are expressed intelligently and actually work (so this leftism shit is doomed regardless), I don't see how being a normalfag who whines about capitalism while engaging in it as much as possible is productive.
 
"So what you're saying is that vaush and destiny are what sargon was to spencer? A stepping stone with broader if milder appeal. Kind of makes sense."

Yeah that's a good way to put it.

I think he's saying they are the corn syrup to snob-socialism's cane sugar. But if you're talking about upheaval-endorsing socialist leftism do you really want the watered-down version where Lenin has a Netflix subscription, uses Reddit on his Macbook and is often found sipping Starbucks? People respond best to new ideas that are expressed intelligently and actually work (so this leftism shit is doomed regardless), I don't see how being a normalfag who whines about capitalism while engaging in it as much as possible is productive.
Normal liberals that mock drumpf and supported Hillary are turned off by "ackshually the democrats are as bad as the republicans" "even Bernie Sanders supports Imperialism", "support my 20th century ideology that you heard about in school".

So Vaush makes socialism, or at least socialistic aesthetics amenable to normie libs who find autistic "this is how Trotsky would have organized the Amazon strikers" larping off putting.

The average lib is not say Matt Ygglesias(sp?) or someone who cares enough to make a coherent defense of capitalism, they're open to the idea of socialism just not the way online communists present it. So Vaush is something of a gateway.

If you want an idea of how terminally online communists feel about breadtubers-see how they reacted when Hasan bought a house from the money he grifted.

I recall some leftist seething saying that "Lenin would have shot Vaush". (Which while probably true doesn't change the fact Vaush is popular and online Marxist-Leninism is not).
 
Last edited:
"So what you're saying is that vaush and destiny are what sargon was to spencer? A stepping stone with broader if milder appeal. Kind of makes sense."

Yeah that's a good way to put it.


Normal liberals that mock drumpf and supported Hillary are turned off by "ackshually the democrats are as bad as the republicans" "even Bernie Sanders supports Imperialism", "support my 20th century ideology that you heard about in school".

So Vaush makes socialism, or at least socialistic aesthetics amenable to normie libs who find autistic "this is how Trotsky would have organized the Amazon strikers" larping off putting.

The average lib is not say Matt Ygglesias(sp?) or someone who cares enough to make a coherent defense of capitalism, they're open to the idea of socialism just not the way online communists present it. So Vaush is something of a gateway.

If you want an idea of how terminally online communists feel about breadtubers-see how they reacted when Hasan bought a house from the money he grifted.

I recall some leftist seething saying that "Lenin would have shot Vaush". (Which while probably true doesn't change the fact Vaush is popular and online Marxist-Leninism is not).
Even Destiny called Hasan out for the house though, and it was one of a handful of times his brain has ever worked.

I think he even got into it with Vaush about it, and Vaush came out looking like a hypocrite who doesn’t believe in anything. Not to mention, I think “no moral argument against CP” and “get guns and shoot republicans when they drive down your street” Vaush is seen as just as extreme as the other Breadtubers.
J.K. Rowling exposed him to the mainstream, and it wasn’t pretty.

Destiny has said this too. That Vaush’s extremism has essentially trapped him, because mainstream hates him, and Breadtube gets pissed with him.
 
Even Destiny called Hasan out for the house though, and it was one of a handful of times his brain has ever worked.

I think he even got into it with Vaush about it, and Vaush came out looking like a hypocrite who doesn’t believe in anything. Not to mention, I think “no moral argument against CP” and “get guns and shoot republicans when they drive down your street” Vaush is seen as just as extreme as the other Breadtubers.
J.K. Rowling exposed him to the mainstream, and it wasn’t pretty.

Destiny has said this too. That Vaush’s extremism has essentially trapped him, because mainstream hates him, and Breadtube gets pissed with him.
On the other hand, Vaush is sitting at 418k+ subscribers which means over 20k people decided to sub to this fat gay retard sexpest after the mainstream call-out. So it seems like gas isn't running out now.
 
Even Destiny called Hasan out for the house though, and it was one of a handful of times his brain has ever worked.

I think he even got into it with Vaush about it, and Vaush came out looking like a hypocrite who doesn’t believe in anything. Not to mention, I think “no moral argument against CP” and “get guns and shoot republicans when they drive down your street” Vaush is seen as just as extreme as the other Breadtubers.
J.K. Rowling exposed him to the mainstream, and it wasn’t pretty.

Destiny has said this too. That Vaush’s extremism has essentially trapped him, because mainstream hates him, and Breadtube gets pissed with him.
Vaush doesn't believe in anything but child pornography and increasing his subscriber totals. But you're right-its all an astroturfed grift.

Vaush cheers for NATO and this makes anti Imperialists/stalinists/trots hate him as a crypto-lib, and his "views" on child porn make him too seedy to become a basic liberal. So, he occupies a niche between.

I'd say Breadtube as a whole are basically soc-dems, they believe that capitalism itself isn't bad per se, its just badly regulated and a more expansive welfare state is needed. None of them that I know of actually argue for toppling the capitalist order, either peacefully or through revolution. In social policy they're pretty much the same, the difference is emphasis-do we give ten trillion in reparations to blacks or 15 trillion and higher taxes, or 15 trillion, 98% tax rates, and bestiality legalized.
 
I wonder if World Peace 2 (which Sam confirmed in a livestream the other day) will reference Sam killing Hasan
It's kind of incredible that Sam Hyde is the only one with a following that you see go at Hasan (and arguably not even that heavily, like he does with Anthony Fantano) when Hasan is such a prime target for lampooning, you couldn't ask for a bigger lolcow for milking
 
That would never be worth it. If this dude so much as smiled at a female fan he'd be getting #metoo'd so fast it would be some kind of record. Honestly if I were to make a hierarchy of metoo-able e-celebs, I think Hasan might take the top position.

Also I know very little about the guy so consider this an idiot's opinion, but he seems to have something wrong with him in that regard.
I don't know if he's just a bitch as a man or he's just a fucking retard or what, but Destiny the gnome can't seem to walk to the fridge without tripping and stumbling into of-age poon, while Hasan has to resort to brothels and acts like a retarded teenager who'd be scared of touching a boob.

Either way if he was philandering with fans I don't think it would be long before we'd all hear about it.
There's definitely something wrong with a retard like Hasan that nails porn whores. Those diseased skanks will fuck literally anybody so long as some greasy kike hands them a wad of cash.
 
There's definitely something wrong with a retard like Hasan that nails porn whores. Those diseased skanks will fuck literally anybody so long as some greasy kike hands them a wad of cash.
Yeah, but Hasan is even worse than a kike. He is - may Allah forgive me for uttering this word - a Turk.

And a Leftist.

And a hypocrite.
 
Here's a little Twitter thread on Hasan's doxxing hypocrisy.

nick-deorio-hasan.png

Link | Archive





 
Last edited:
There is something so fucking infuriating about Hasan who actively encourages the deplatforming of anyone to right of a Bush style Neo-conservative trying to get a smug jab in at Elon over freedom of speech.
View attachment 4104915
Elon, you are one of the richest men on the planet, surely you have the means to hire mercenaries to take out those who insult your honor?
 
Hasan probably has more CIA contacts than Musk since he's a useful idiot.
How is a sheltered neet, who can't even feed, bathe, or clothe himself, an asset to the CIA?

Hassan is retarded. He has a degree that didn't even have a math requirement. He never leaves his house. I'm not convinced that Hassan understands how time zones work.
 
Back