Homosexuality is evil.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What is your stance on homosexuality?


  • Total voters
    187
  • Poll closed .
@Norbert the Tiger

Hmm that was actually kinda interesting. Youtube would definitely scrub that kind of stuff off. Tbh I don't care much about stuff like a 17 year old dating a 22 year old, but a 14 year old and a middle aged man is definitely messed up. All that being said though, how do you know that this applies gays in general though? Like, these could just be handpicked examples. There maybe like 50 more who he interviewed yet didn't manage to dig up any dirt on. That being said, all these do confirm my suspicion that childhood sexual abuse could roll people that way.
The weird thing is that the age difference goes back since at least the Greek Roman era. Then you have people like nobunaga oda who fucked his retainer Ranmaru Mori, but that was more in regards to some special Japanese relationship thing that wouldn't make sense today.
Mary Villiers had her son George seduce the king. (They're doing a series about it starring Julianne Moore)
Then the more fucked up shit happens like Allen Ginsberg and tge Death in Venice thing and fucking Walt Whitman.....then AIDS.

Now that being said there is nothing wrong with those LGB who aren't in the pride shit and whatnot. It is the troons that have made life difficult.
 
Comparing homosexual encounters to incest is a bit of a reach, don't you think? Scat, though... maybe? I'd wager butt-fucking involves discovering the odd nugget of shit here and there and it doesn't seem to turn them off, so I'm on the fence on that one. But what society says is generally the opposite of what society does when they believe nobody is watching.
In scat the poop is a feature, in just regular anal it's a bug. enthusiasts will go to some lengths to prepare for and avoid this.
The good old slippery slope fallacy. I recall in the early 90's how boomers went on about how accepting gays in society would lead to attempts to normalize pedophilia. Well here we are, chud. It's 2023 and as you all can see there hasn't been any.... wait... oh dear.
As I remember, in the '90s the conservative family-values people were carrying on that if gay marriage were allowed, the zoophiles would be next, demanding the right to marry goats and dogs. Not pedophiles, but maybe we were listening to different news sources.
I think there is a legitimate debate to had here. Attempts to normalize pedophilia and getting it accepted.. unfortunately they do happen. And nine times out of ten, when we see it, we see it under the banner of the alphabet soup. When noise was made about making sexual assault against minors punishable by death, who was the first to cry about it?
I feel like 75%+ of the people trying to normalize pedophilia are straight men ranting about how it's totally normal to want to fuck 15-year-old girls. Gay pedophiles know better than to try and campaign for their right to be pederasts, even though they've got a better historical claim to the practice.
 
So is polygamy
As I stated before, if polygamy is illegal, as it should be, polyamory should be illegal as well. The stigma around it is slowing withering away.
its just a result of biological error.
I was going to give you a disagree sticker and then..
Socially cultivated homosexuality is the result of social influences and grooming,
This is absolutely the correct take. There is some evidence that some males are predisposed to homosexuality. One viable theory is that a woman who has more than three children closer to menopause induces a deficiency in a testosterone bath. That is why a lot of them who are just effeminate by nature tend to be the youngest sibling in a three, four, or more children family.
Cultural norms and and personal experiences during critical mapping stages are powerful factors behind an individual's sexual orienation, with women being much more malleable than men. I have stated this before in an earlier post.
: Idk why the fuck everybodys resorting to religious arguments almost immediately, try to use rationalist arguments please
This is why establishment conservatism in the United States is so ineffective, or at least one of the reasons, that and Dan Quayle thinking that taxes for the ruling class will help solve the blacks collective racial commitment to crime.
[Divorce is] an example of something Jesus explicitly condemns but which modern churches generally tolerate. If divorced straight people can go to church without a dozen retards mobbing them with bits of Scripture like crows in a Hitchcock film, then it is hypocritical and heavy handed to condemn homosexuality.
Morality and immorality is not binary or an off and on switch. Divorce may be immoral but it is not nearly AS wrong as unjustified murder. Of course, no fault divorce, the rise of single motherhood has created an explosion of many social ills that emanate from these core social ills. So the Church and society would do better to be less tolerant of divorce. I am not Christian and Jesus was wrong about a great many things but he was right about that.
Comparing homosexual encounters to incest is a bit of a reach
Except on twitter, reddit and elsewhere incest is creeping up into things some of those freaks discuss and rationalize with the same "love is love," what "someone does in his own bedroom does not concern you" ethos. It comes up regularly in some of the anti-reddit twitter accounts that screenshot some of the worst moments on that site.
The good old slippery slope fallacy. I recall in the early 90's how boomers went on about how accepting gays in society would lead to attempts to normalize pedophilia. Well here we are, chud. It's 2023 and as you all can see there hasn't been any.... wait... oh dear.

I think there is a legitimate debate to had here.
I addressed this in an earlier post as well. The slippery slope is not a fallacy. Just because text books in school declare something to be true does not mean it is. In relation to norms and mores, there is a concept called defining deviancy down. It is discussed in Slouching Towards Gomorrah by Robert Bork. The theory, also known as the Durkheim Constant, posits that any society has a quotient of deviant behavior that is not socially acceptable but is not perscuted in a way to make such behavior unheard of. That quotient of deviant behavior is the same across all societies and civilizations. The result of this is a society of saints (say an amish plantaton) and a society of sinners (like ours or Sodom and Gomorrah) will have vastly different norms and mores, but the overall amount of behavior on the edges remains the same.
What this means is that once homosexuality is normalized--and this is especially pertinent to so called gay marriage--things that were outside that outer ring of deviant but only stigmatized behavior then bcome the fringe. That is why the troon menace could never have happened without gay marriage becomes normalized, defining deviancy further down. Defining deviancy down is to ever devolving cultural norms and mores what the time flux capicator is to time travel in Back to the Future--it is what makes everything going to shit possible
 
I'm bi and avoid men as much as possible, wouldn't call it evil but it definitely does something to the brain.
Just focus on getting a woman.

Homosexuality is evil? How is two consenting men making love in their bedroom evil? Maybe you need to really just worry about your own life (or lack of it) instead of worrying about what consenting adults do with theirs? Just a thought.
I need to mind my business yet fags can cancel and censor anyone they want.
 
I was going to give you a disagree sticker and then..
I have some liberal tendencies, I am willing to consider the possibility of a completely biological immutable case of homosexuality from birth, it just happens. Entropy always contributes to 5% of all possible events in the universe, there is certainly the possibility of some mutation or something causing somebody to be gay or troon minded from birth. That was the argument which the "Born this way" people stretched to accommodate their goals 20 years ago. Im also willing to consider the absolute furthest stretch of that argument which Ive heard that homosexuality is a biological population control mechanism in all species which disproportionately increases in high population environments. But I dont think any of those arguments could ever explain the behavior of the gays in their rapey effeminate social influence glory and the way they expand territory demographics and psychology, which is where every liberal and leftist fails.
 
I'm willing to make an exception give how @Vingle acts. Good God...
In my case it is that people were increasingly more shitty towards me for no reason. Instead of an heroing I turned out to be part evil. Especially against fags.

This can't be blamed on me being gay.

The gay community is full of shitty people and it's an endless loop of grooming others to be just as shitty. When they say it's homophobia, when you call out them being shit.

Go jerk off to your grandma.
 
In my case it is that people were increasingly more shitty towards me for no reason. Instead of an heroing I turned out to be part evil. Especially against fags.

This can't be blamed on me being gay.

The gay community is full of shitty people and it's an endless loop of grooming others to be just as shitty. When they say it's homophobia, when you call out them being shit.

Go jerk off to your grandma.
why do you like butt stuff
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chao Garden
As I remember, in the '90s the conservative family-values people were carrying on that if gay marriage were allowed, the zoophiles would be next, demanding the right to marry goats and dogs. Not pedophiles, but maybe we were listening to different news sources.

Are you implying they were not right? Have you seen how girls behave with their pets? You should know, shouldn't you? The things you're forcing them cats into...
 
As I remember, in the '90s the conservative family-values people were carrying on that if gay marriage were allowed, the zoophiles would be next, demanding the right to marry goats and dogs. Not pedophiles, but maybe we were listening to different news sources.
They are. LGBTZ is a growing movement. They hide within the furry community (who encourages their behavior) and are behind the rise of pro-furry articles from journos. You are now considered a bigot (and a homophobe) if you make fun of furries. I expect that within 10-15 years we'll be seeing the rise of a big zoophile rights movement from the furry community, just like we're starting to see the first cautious approaches at legitimizing pedophilia (at least since NAMBLA got thrown out of the gay rights community in the 80s and that pedo faggot Harry Hay cried about it).
 
How do you guys feel about lesbians
Hot. I'm literally purple
1696375438944.jpg
 
Far right: you can't have sex with women, that's evil and unnatural!
This is a pretty dumb take.

Even if you go back 50-60 years(aka the ulta mega giga far right) the issue was public decency, which it has always been.
I am willing to consider the possibility of a completely biological immutable case of homosexuality from birth, it just happens
Based on what ive seen, what people have told me 99% of gay men fall into two categories;

Hypersexual deviants that dont care who gets them off, so their end state is simply hooking up with other hypersexual deviants men.

Men who where sexually abused during childhood so being gay was imprinted on them.
The good old slippery slope fallacy. I recall in the early 90's how boomers went on about how accepting gays in society would lead to attempts to normalize pedophilia. Well here we are, chud. It's 2023 and as you all can see there hasn't been any.... wait... oh dear.
The premise was that if gay marriage was allowed, something worse will certainly follow.

And something much worse certainly has followed in it's wake, troons which is going hand in hand with pedophilia. In case you havent realized social issues are generally an endless ratchet effect. Drugs are another fantastic example, look at the horrific problems we are facing with opioids now that weed has gained acceptance over the past decade.
 
Last edited:
absolute furthest stretch of that argument which Ive heard that homosexuality is a biological population control mechanism in all species which disproportionately increases in high population environments.
I think this is highly unlikely. Homosexuality in women seems mostly a cultural phenomenon, not intrinsic. And homosexuality in men wouldn't really affect birth rates.
 
Back