How much free speech is too much free speech?

I would say I want to move it away from "totalitarianism," but at this point I'm more interested in hearing your 400 IQ solution. Do nothing?
My solution is git gud u chobo

You want to move away from totalitarianism by being totalitarian towards the commies. Oh sorry you just want to move the Overton window. Towards what? Towards repression of the doubleplusbadspeakers? What is your multiverse brained solution? You're deliberately vague about it, I wonder why
Oh yeah we just need to heckin' voote harder so orange man can get a second term and piss off the libtards on Twitter. SJWs totally owned epic style!!1 Because electing Trump really solved all of these problems the first time around.
You sound like a child. You also sound like something else but we'll get to that
This is the same as the one I already posted. The tranny will just keep screaming death at you, he doesn't care about your arguments or logic.
The screeching troon isn't the audience
No, I think you're pretty clearly gray rather than black or white, in multiple senses of the term (you know, gray like an NPC). Rather than being overtly evil you're just a useful idiot.
Touch grass
And yet you are explicitly fine with speech that calls for violence and censorship rather than disagreements and debates. Square that circle for me. And the idea that you care about """debates""" is a joke when you instantly resort to calling people Nazis.
You sound like a nigger, you literally can't even so your response is to chimp out. If someone says I should be shut up or hurt for my speech my response is to speak more and speak louder, not babble about moving the Overton window so they can be shut up and hurt
 
My solution is git gud u chobo

You want to move away from totalitarianism by being totalitarian towards the commies. Oh sorry you just want to move the Overton window. Towards what? Towards repression of the doubleplusbadspeakers? What is your multiverse brained solution? You're deliberately vague about it, I wonder why

I actually like the way you put it. My "solution" is to "speak louder."
 
It is not physically possible to teach "all opinions including the most retarded ones"
"Teaching opinions" is retarded by definition, opinion is subjective. School must provide a basic set of skills that should give human species basic ability to draw basic conclusions about the world that surrounds him/her. What human does further with that set of skills doesn't cocnern me.
 
"Teaching opinions" is retarded by definition, opinion is subjective. School must provide a basic set of skills that should give human species basic ability to draw basic conclusions about the world that surrounds him/her. What human does further with that set of skills doesn't cocnern me.

And that requires common agreement on what those basic conclusions are, which is a subject of political conflict. Case in point: many public schools now teach children the "basic conclusions" that if Sally likes to play with trucks instead of dollhouses, maybe Sally is really Steve. This is presented to children not as opinion, but as objective fact.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: SSj_Ness (Yiffed)
Case in point: many public schools now teach children the "basic conclusions" that if Sally likes to play with trucks instead of dollhouses, maybe Sally is really Steve.
Get your kid another school.
 
I want to say nigger boogaloo gang jews bad all I god damn want without people calling me a "bigot" because they don't understand the truth.

Is that too much to ask?
 
Back