Culture How to hide a promiscuous past from your new man - Sometimes the sex is so slammin' you can't risk scaring him off. Here's what you gotta do.

​

How to hide a promiscuous past from your new man- https://archive.ph/uZnLn

Sometimes the sex is so slammin' you can't risk scaring him off. Here's what you gotta do.

February 27, 2022 by LULZ

First of all, let’s make one thing perfectly clear: There is absolutely nothing wrong with being a slut. The fact is that you have to kiss a lot of frogs before you find your prince, and in this year of 2022, people are free to experience sex no matter their color or creed.

Also, your current partner is the only person it could possibly concern, and that means that a wild ride is by definition the past.

In an ideal world, men wouldn’t care about our Number whatsoever. But seeing as this is still a White Supremacist patriarchy, we’re going to go ahead and assert that men absolutely will find issue with a woman having scored numbers on the higher end of the slut spectrum.

Related: 11 warning signs that a guy is an insecure beta

And sometimes the sex is so good you can’t risk scaring him off. This tutorial is for those times. Here’s what you gotta do.
#1. Try to find out the number of people he has slept with!

If it’s more than what you’ve bagged so far, chill. You don’t have to say anything.
#2. Lie. It’s that simple.

IMPORTANT: And then, follow up with an almost virginal act — but don’t overdo it.
#3. Tell all, if you must — but with a twist!

Like promoting a couple of bonks to an old boyfriend status… that way you can get down to telling tales of about two or three men in total.
#4. Tell the truth? MAYBE…

Some men are actually not bothered by a woman’s ‘lively’ past. But before you tell all, be sure that you are dating one such. How do you find out? Well, is he HAWT?
#5. Pretend past lovers were terrible.

And even if you have decided to reveal everything, remember that when you did, you didn’t enjoy it very much either. It’s not that it didn’t mean anything…, it’s just that with him it means so much more. So tamper your truth-or-dare with a bit of “baby, you’re the best”… always goes down well.
#6. And say they abused you.

Don’t let your man think too critically when you’re being creative with the truth. Toy with his emotions by hinting, or even saying outright, that a lot of these old “boyfriends” abused you.
#7. Do your cyber op sec and do it right.

You already knew to prune any evidence from your social media, but I bet you didn’t know you should also create a plausible cover story for missing information or blocks of time.

Blaming it on an ex hacking and vandalizing your accounts after a bad breakup is the good old trusty, but you can really cook with your creative juices here. The more elaborate and preplanned the story, the harder it will be to crack for your new dude’s prodding questions. Have an answer to every question. Most importantly — have fun!
#8. And finally: always bring trusted friends in on the conspiracy.

One more thing, make sure your friends are briefed. You don’t want to be in a social situation where one of them suddenly blurts out, “Do you remember when we were in Ibiza and you did it with three men on one night?” in front of your man.
Please share our work! Thank you.



Hadn't realized how short this article was with the graphics removed.

 

[Somchai]

Also, if "there isn't anything wrong with being a slut", why are you trying to hide it?

She explains it in the article:

In an ideal world, men wouldn’t care about our Number whatsoever. But seeing as this is still a White Supremacist patriarchy, we’re going to go ahead and assert that men absolutely will find issue with a woman having scored numbers on the higher end of the slut spectrum.

Because of patriarchy, duh!

Anyway it's a redpill trope that women's ability to pair-bond rapidly deteriorate as the number of partners they've had rises. I've seen statistics that show that for each new partner a woman has had before she gets married she's significantly more likely to get divorced.

There's also a problem that stems from the fact that women can easily get laid with guys that are significantly better (measured by whatever metric she uses to evaluate men) than anyone she can get to commit to her in a relationship. Which is obvious, since if you're an attractive guy you might fuck a mediocre girl every once in a while just because she makes it easy for you. So women that sleep around a lot get deluded into thinking they "deserve" a top-tier guy just because she's managed to sleep with several such guys, even though none would ever commit to her. And when she finally decides to get into a relationship and start a family she'll inevitably feel like she's settling with someone that's beneath her and she won't be happy.

So there are actually a lot of reasons to avoid promiscuous women that are wholly unrelated to "white patriarchy" and beyond the obvious ones like diseases or jealous exes.

 

[mr.moon1488]

I don't think you can hide an Arby's burger between your legs.

 

[Ser Prize]

She explains it in the article:

Because of patriarchy, duh!

Anyway it's a redpill trope that women's ability to pair-bond rapidly deteriorate as the number of partners they've had rises. I've seen statistics that show that for each new partner a woman has had before she gets married she's significantly more likely to get divorced.

There's also a problem that stems from the fact that women can easily get laid with guys that are significantly better (measured by whatever metric she uses to evaluate men) than anyone she can get to commit to her in a relationship. Which is obvious, since if you're an attractive guy you might fuck a mediocre girl every once in a while just because she makes it easy for you. So women that sleep around a lot get deluded into thinking they "deserve" a top-tier guy just because she's managed to sleep with several such guys, even though none would ever commit to her. And when she finally decides to get into a relationship and start a family she'll inevitably feel like she's settling with someone that's beneath her and she won't be happy.

So there are actually a lot of reasons to avoid promiscuous women that are wholly unrelated to "white patriarchy" and beyond the obvious ones like diseases or jealous exes.

Yeah, pair bonding ability plummets. IIRC it's because your body builds up a tolerance to the chemicals that are supposed to cause it.

The other issue is that you can be the ugliest woman in town and you'd still have desperate fucks from two towns over going for you, because 'doesn't matter had sex'.

 

[Butcher Pete]

It's no longer a worthwhile woman after a nigger's dick has been in it.

 

[b0x]

She explains it in the article:

Because of patriarchy, duh!

Anyway it's a redpill trope that women's ability to pair-bond rapidly deteriorate as the number of partners they've had rises. I've seen statistics that show that for each new partner a woman has had before she gets married she's significantly more likely to get divorced.

There's also a problem that stems from the fact that women can easily get laid with guys that are significantly better (measured by whatever metric she uses to evaluate men) than anyone she can get to commit to her in a relationship. Which is obvious, since if you're an attractive guy you might fuck a mediocre girl every once in a while just because she makes it easy for you. So women that sleep around a lot get deluded into thinking they "deserve" a top-tier guy just because she's managed to sleep with several such guys, even though none would ever commit to her. And when she finally decides to get into a relationship and start a family she'll inevitably feel like she's settling with someone that's beneath her and she won't be happy.

So there are actually a lot of reasons to avoid promiscuous women that are wholly unrelated to "white patriarchy" and beyond the obvious ones like diseases or jealous exes.

If you look into the stats, this holds true. Because Women who want to get laid, they can get some super hot guys from time to time, who just want to fuck, so they then inflate their self worth. While the Men still have to measure themselves correctly against the possible girls they could get. Because there is NEVER a super hot put together girl looking for losers to just bang. She's either a professional escort, or a professional escort looking for a future husband, which is not you. If you think you got lucky and got a Super Hot girl? It's guaranteed that shes got some combination of single mother/drug problems/mental illness/cutting/cheating/emotional or physical abuse.

 

[Mr. Bung]

Lol, she must have a spade tattooed on her ass.

 

[CaesarCzech]

, sweet girl, a >220 body count in under 18 months. IShe showed me her serial-killer like spreadsheet where she detailed her exploits. She went to med school in a different state and ended up marrying a neurosurgeon who she convinced she was a virgin. She'd be the first person to tell you people like her only exist in incel's imaginations.

Loool you arent as dumb as Neurosurgeon but still pretty dumb, useful flunkie is useful.

 

[BelUwUga]

Loool you arent as dumb as Neurosurgeon but still pretty dumb, useful flunkie is useful.

The seething won't make your penis larger, your behavior less autistic, or make you any less of an incel.


This may shock and surprise you but people that have sex aren't so desperate they need to stick their dick in a human septic tank.

 

[CaesarCzech]

The seething won't make your penis larger, your behavior less autistic, or make you any less of an incel.

View attachment 3136249
This may shock and surprise you but people that have sex aren't so desperate they need to stick their dick in a human septic tank.

Me being pathetic does in no way make my statement untrue, Both can be true buddy.

 

[BelUwUga]

Me being pathetic does in no way make my statement untrue, Both can be true buddy.

I was just pointing out that unlike incel shitposts on /R9K/ you're not anonymous here and have fair documentation showing you're probably not qualified to speak on the matter. Also you're enough of an autist you probably will not understand/accept an explanation.

• Could have if I wanted to. Had her naked ass pretty much jump me on multiple occasions. Since I have a modicum of self-control I didn't do anything. This was a personal lolcow that was far more entertaining than a hookup that would precipitate her moving on.
• When complete sluts feel comfortable and safe around you, they bring their less-slutty friends, and they gush about you. Why kill my golden egg laying goose?
• As I mentioned this started from doing a solid for a friend who was also a fraternity brother. Oaths and brotherhood mean more than some slag. I couldn't give a fuck about her ruining her own life. I wasn't going to stand by and watch her ruin someone else's with a whoopsie baby.

 

[Maurice Caine]

I mean let's be honest here gender relations are and have been fucked for years. I for one welcome our new sexbot overlords.

 

[Inebriated Raccoon]

This seems to be an unpopular opinion, but unless you're packing an STD your sexual past isn't anyone's business but yours. Being upset about a partners body count usually comes from insecurity about your own. If someone asks me about my past I don't answer it other than to assure them that they have nothing relevant to worry about, and I sure as hell don't ask about theirs.

From my perspective, if you purposely avoid answering a simple question about your body count, that signifies to me that you are insecure about it and are afraid of judgement.

I notice this attitude in a lot of “slut-positive” people. They’ll state that their is no shame in their sexual past then refuse to be honest about and take ownership of their sexual past while claiming that others are insecure for asking.

I don’t care what people do about their bodies, I just find the cognitive dissonance to be interesting. My favorite instance of this dissonance is when someone on social media says that they won’t date someone who has a high body count and a bunch of people, with high body counts, immediately go on the offensive to attack the person’s character and call them insecure, loser, virgin, etc. That just screams insecurity to me. As far as I’m concerned, if you’re going to be a hoe then be a proud and honest hoe.

 

[Some JERK]

From my perspective, if you purposely avoid answering a simple question about your body count, that signifies to me that you are insecure about it and are afraid of judgement.

I notice this attitude in a lot of “slut-positive” people. They’ll state that their is no shame in their sexual past then refuse to be honest about and take ownership of their sexual past while claiming that others are insecure for asking.

I don’t care what people do about their bodies, I just find the cognitive dissonance to be interesting. My favorite instance of this dissonance is when someone on social media says that they won’t date someone who has a high body count and a bunch of people, with high body counts, immediately go on the offensive to attack the person’s character and call them insecure, loser, virgin, etc. That just screams insecurity to me. As far as I’m concerned, if you’re going to be a hoe then be a proud and honest hoe.

Nah, it's more that I don't feel like fueling an insecure person's insecurity. If you're worried about the exact number of people someone has slept with then you've got a few issues to work through. I don't and have never had any STDs. That's the only thing that anyone needs to know. As for what my body count says regarding my trustworthiness or whatever, if I'm untrustworthy I'm just going to lie anyway so it's not like any answer I give is going to tell you anything. I find that people who are concerned with body counts tend to be on the younger side and have a pretty narrow view of sex and relationships.

 

[CaesarCzech]

I was just pointing out that unlike incel shitposts on /R9K/ you're not anonymous here and have fair documentation showing you're probably not qualified to speak on the matter. Also you're enough of an autist you probably will not understand/accept an explanation.

• Could have if I wanted to. Had her naked ass pretty much jump me on multiple occasions. Since I have a modicum of self-control I didn't do anything. This was a personal lolcow that was far more entertaining than a hookup that would precipitate her moving on.
• When complete sluts feel comfortable and safe around you, they bring their less-slutty friends, and they gush about you. Why kill my golden egg laying goose?
• As I mentioned this started from doing a solid for a friend who was also a fraternity brother. Oaths and brotherhood mean more than some slag. I couldn't give a fuck about her ruining her own life. I wasn't going to stand by and watch her ruin someone else's with a whoopsie baby.

No thats not what im talking about, you called her friend and sweet.

 

[BelUwUga]

No thats not what im talking about, you called her friend and sweet.

Ah so not enough salt and vitriol for you? While I like a good lolcow I'm not quite enough of a psychopath to feign friendship for more than a year for observations. While I didn't agree with the whoring it's not a transgression at the level I can't be friends with someone. As insane as she could be and as aberrant as some behavior was, she was a friend. If I wasn't able to look past glaring flaws we wouldn't be having this conversation now. Also, generally women trying to flirt to act sweet. More flies with honey than vinegar and all that.

 

[CaesarCzech]

Ah so not enough salt and vitriol for you? While I like a good lolcow I'm not quite enough of a psychopath to feign friendship for more than a year for observations. While I didn't agree with the whoring it's not a transgression at the level I can't be friends with someone. As insane as she could be and as aberrant as some behavior was, she was a friend. If I wasn't able to look past glaring flaws we wouldn't be having this conversation now. Also, generally women trying to flirt to act sweet. More flies with honey than vinegar and all that.

Im just saying that if she managed to manipulate the surgeon, what makes you think she was actually friend ? got what i mean ?

 

[BelUwUga]

Im just saying that if she managed to manipulate the surgeon, what makes you think she was actually friend ? got what i mean ?

Between drunken admissions and me being exactly the type of asshole to go through her phone while she was passed out in my room, I was able to get a pretty clear picture of the lies and truths she was telling me. As a somewhat detached observer I also think I was able to get unique insight into the lies she was telling herself.

Need me to ship "Hooked on Phonics" to Czech for ya?

 

[Troutsmacked]

They capitalized "White". Satire confirmed.

 

[Leave_Fargut]

#7. Do your cyber op sec and do it right.

You already knew to prune any evidence from your social media, but I bet you didn’t know you should also create a plausible cover story for missing information or blocks of time.

Blaming it on an ex hacking and vandalizing your accounts after a bad breakup is the good old trusty, but you can really cook with your creative juices here. The more elaborate and preplanned the story, the harder it will be to crack for your new dude’s prodding questions. Have an answer to every question. Most importantly — have fun!
#8. And finally: always bring trusted friends in on the conspiracy.

One more thing, make sure your friends are briefed. You don’t want to be in a social situation where one of them suddenly blurts out, “Do you remember when we were in Ibiza and you did it with three men on one night?” in front of your man.

This is seriously unhinged shit. Going DFE and creating cover stories for blocks of your life just to prep for having a new boyfriend? Trying to erase your entire past every time you meet someone knew is bonafide schizoshit. This is as bad as that shit in Cosmo which told women to settle arguments by keying their man's car

Gone through their back catalogue. Has to be satire

 

[Inebriated Raccoon]

Nah, it's more that I don't feel like fueling an insecure person's insecurity. If you're worried about the exact number of people someone has slept with then you've got a few issues to work through. I don't and have never had any STDs. That's the only thing that anyone needs to know. As for what my body count says regarding my trustworthiness or whatever, if I'm untrustworthy I'm just going to lie anyway so it's not like any answer I give is going to tell you anything. I find that people who are concerned with body counts tend to be on the younger side and have a pretty narrow view of sex and relationships.

That’s a fair point! I suppose it is similar to your partner asking you to rate their appearance out of 10, it’s better to divert and find a way not to fuel their insecurity about their appearance. So, I can concede that in those cases, diverting isn’t due to dishonesty or shame.

I do agree that the most important thing, other than having potential children, is STD exposure, especially if you have an incurable STD or one that is curable but you’re currently on treatment for.