- Joined
- Sep 6, 2017
This is about happiness, not meaning.Recognize there is no meaning in life at all. Once you accept this, you are free to give it any meaning you wish.
EDIT: Never mind, re-read the OP.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is about happiness, not meaning.Recognize there is no meaning in life at all. Once you accept this, you are free to give it any meaning you wish.
If you have a meaningful life then you are happy by default. People go about it ass-backwards trying to be happy and then find meaning. Have meaning in what you do and happiness will follow in the pursuit of that meaningful endeavor.This is about happiness, not meaning.
If you have a meaningful life then you are happy by default. People go about it ass-backwards trying to be happy and then find meaning. Have meaning in what you do and happiness will follow in the pursuit of that meaningful endeavor.
Interesting thoughts.See, for me, meaning/purpose to life is as intangible a concept as "living in the moment". If the common secular idea of meaning, is something that you have to give to yourself, then, I dunno, isn't that cheating? Isn't that just a cheap cop-out hit of copium for those who don't have any spiritualism/religion? I am personally made thoroughly uncomfortable by the idea that meaning and purpose are things I should have to define. It's too easy, and worse, you can be wrong about that meaning and purpose. The times I have tried to do that in my life, have not gotten me anything. Maybe this, too, is a dragon.
Or maybe the idea that happiness doesn't exist is actually the sour grapes of a dissatisfied brain?Ding ding ding. The promise of happiness is the shell game your brain plays to trick you into performing your various biological imperatives.
If you become unhappy the moment you dare to take stock of the fruits of all your labors, I'd say that is the very epitome of a biological shell game.A happy person doesn't think much about whether or not they're happy. That type of rumination itself tends to be a product of unhappiness.
while technically true, this answer is extremely gayDing ding ding. The promise of happiness is the shell game your brain plays to trick you into performing your various biological imperatives.
In other words, it's undeniably true but it makes people big sad to acknowledge it.while technically true, this answer is extremely gay
Really depends on if you think being contented and being happy are the same thing. If not, and they're somehow mutually exclusive, then you're right. But if you consider contentment to be happiness, or a form of happiness then no because contentment is a long-term achievable state, the threshold for which can be considerably altered by life experiences and emergent circumstances.In other words, it's undeniably true but it makes people big sad to acknowledge it.
It's what they think would make them pretty happy, just like other people think a job or a house or a car or solid gold toilet would make them happy. And as soon as they acclimated to not having that pain anymore, they'd go right back on the hamster wheel to nowhere.I'm pretty sure there's a large number of people out there who would be pretty happy if they could just live their life without knee/back/elbow/wrist/etc pain.
Well again that's how it works if you presume happiness is only ever a kind of fleeting joy, and that contentedness can't be considered a form of happiness. Which is what I'm getting at, if you look at happiness as defined only as that sort of joy, then yes you will never find it.It's what they think would make them pretty happy, just like other people think a job or a house or a car or solid gold toilet would make them happy. And as soon as they acclimated to not having that pain anymore, they'd go right back on the hamster wheel to nowhere.
That's how we're wired. The Buddhists characterized the problem pretty damn well.
I don't agree with that at all. I think any notion of long-term "contentedness" is subject to precisely the same shell game as whatever kind of ephemeral elation/bliss/joy you're talking about.Well again that's how it works if you presume happiness is only ever a kind of fleeting joy, and that contentedness can't be considered a form of happiness.
Gratitude and appreciation versus want/relief I guess? That you can be grateful and content with what you have or set reasonable goals and achieve them in the span of your life, and the contentment from that is definitely a long-term achievable state of being.I don't agree with that at all. I think any notion of long-term "contentedness" is subject to precisely the same shell game as whatever kind of ephemeral elation/bliss/joy you're talking about.
This isn't exactly esoteric knowledge, adages like "better to have loved and lost", are about this at least in part. It's not a lack of recognition of the pattern so much as it's a recognition that to try for happiness is to at least have a chance at it, to stop following the pattern at all is to guarantee you'll never know it. If you assumed people doing so are the idiots for continuing to follow "the pattern" I'm very sorry.Your brain promises you that something good is on the other side of this mountain and then pulls it away at the last minute. That's fundamentally how human motivation works and so few cotton on to it. They just move on to the next mountain in the distance and never recognize the pattern.
That would be something if the problem were limited to "having loved and lost" or coming up short in some other way.This isn't exactly esoteric knowledge, adages like "better to have loved and lost"
Right, and part of the problem of attempting to explain my side of this is that there's many different positive states that could be described as "happiness" but we all pretty much know and agree on the states that are not happiness. Nobody ever asks what 'sadness' is or how to achieve it, there's never really a discussion necessary on who's definition of 'frustration' will be used in a conversation about that. All I'm saying is, is that you are definitely correct if you only consider happiness to be states of mind that are fleeting.That would be something if the problem were limited to "having loved and lost" or coming up short in some other way.
Is it not a bit of an oversimplification to boil down something as complex as a successful courtship/marriage to a 0/1 reward pathway?But it's not about justifying failure. It's the recognition that even if you loved and won, even if you are successful in your aims, you end up with the same unsatisfying outcome.