- Joined
- Nov 8, 2021
I should have been more precise with my language, sorry. The alcohol industry is not labor-intensive, and that's why a bottle of Makers Mark will set you back 30 dollars, like it did in 2020 - Covid just wasn't a significant supply side shock for them. Meatpacking is definitely a labor intensive industry and it was hit by Covid like a truck - see this Atlantic article, for instance:Not quite true. They were high during the Coof. A lot of things were high during the Coof. A manufactured method of ass raping the middle/lower class.
I was buying Cheap Vodka @ 12 bucks. The same Cheap Vodka is now 10 bucks.
Now I am a firm believer in the Burrito Index. I heard this comment in 1990 and it gained traction in the year 2000.
I use a variation of the method using fast food as an indicator.
The chart below someone did a name brand burrito and its pricing.
View attachment 2707898
I will say this again A lot of this is manufactured by the FEDs and their actions with money, The Biden Administration and its hand messing with the economy, and of course the super rich/ corporations.
Again if companies are suffering why is the stock market gone up? Why businesses are having banner year after year?
We already have Zillow manipulation the housing market 1 or 3 pillars that keeps our economy going.
As stated previously, winter is going to be cold and costly for many this year.
For all imported goods, the labor-intensive ring in the supply chain that broke was shipping.Industrial meatpackers, for example, are having a tough time hiring right now, which might be affecting what you can buy at the grocery store. This type of work was brutal and dangerous before the pandemic, and when the coronavirus hit, some meatpacking plants in the Midwest and Southeast had outbreaks so intense that they briefly drove spikes in statewide infection data all by themselves. Tens of thousands of people were infected, and hundreds of workers died...
The fact remains that the money the Fed printed is not circulating as long as the Fed is both printing and storing it. How exactly it plans on keeping it from entering circulation, once it stops paying on deposits, and what the total costs and benefits will have been of a policy of printing money for open market operations that did not affect anything aside from bank liquidity measures (formally not one of the Fed's two goals, although mission creep now includes pretty much everything as a Fed unofficial goal), is a much more interesting question. Because if political support for paying banks for doing nothing stops and all that money flows into the economy at once, then you do have a Zimbabwe situation.