I adopt pit bulls on Craigslist and put them down - and you should too! - I also do the same with black orphans!


Be honest: chances are that you cross the street when you see a pit bull walking toward you on the same sidewalk. Pit bulls have a well deserved reputation all over the world for being dangerous, aggressive dogs that suddenly snap for no apparent reason. I’m here to tell you the truth is even worse than previously thought.

You see, these murder machines have a well oiled social media disinfo apparatus known as “pit mommies.” The “pit mommy” movement adopts and breeds pit bulls while posting photos of them dressed up in pink tutus and baby clothes. These “adorabull” posts are almost always accompanied by absurd fallacies and false claims about the breed being harmless.

With more and more people now getting their news and ideas from social media, the pit mommy movement has managed to deceptively shift public perception on pits to somewhere in the apathetic middle.

But pit bulls have been selectively bred for bloodsport for centuries. They are genetically hardwired to kill, and to not be deterred by any amount of pain to get the kill. No amount of love and training will undo the pit bull instinct to kill. Someone thinking she’s a good owner with such a lovable muscled doggo will not prevent it from taking its blood prize the moment it sees a window of opportunity.

If you get a pit bull, you are setting the creature and the potential victims around you up for failure by denying history and genetics.

Unfortunately, elected representatives in America are failing to do anything about pit bulls as they continue to mass murder our children and doggoes. I propose and will demonstrate in this article that the pit crisis has now reached a point where We The People are called upon to take matters into our own hands. The continued murder of innocents calls for radical action.

That’s why for three years now I have adopted over a hundred pit bulls on Craigslist — and then put them down.

Because of my efforts, fewer humans (and good doggoes) will have to suffer from pit bull attacks. I like to think that my accumulated effort has over the long term saved at least one child from the lockjaws of death. But, I realize, this form of activism will need hundreds of practitioners across our beautiful country to even begin to get a grip on the pit crisis.

Pit maulings by the numbers​

Even the cuddliest and most well behaved pit bull can and eventually will turn on its humans for no or little reason — like an unexpected sound, or a bout of boredom. They’ve even been known to eat their own owners for a snack, like when Virginian police discovered two pit bulls in the forest casually eating their dead owner’s rib cage (after killing her).

But let’s look at the statistics. Despite making up around 6.2% of the dog population, pit bulls are responsible for over 70% of all fatal dog bites, according to a 2018 scientific study from dog attack authority DogsBite.org. When you include pit mixes, the number goes even higher:

Pit bulls, additional bull breeds and mastiff-type guard dogs and war dogs — the types used to create “baiting” bull breeds and fighting breeds — accounted for a jaw-dropping 87% (40) of all dog bite-related deaths in 2020.

Dog Stats.png


Are you paying attention yet?

To top it all off, pits target children disproportionally more than any other breed. While dogs of all breeds can snap when feeling threatened or in a bad mood, pit bull selection of victim is based on what it thinks it can readily turn into blood soup.

If you’re a pet owner, you’re probably aware that humans aren’t the only victims of pit bulls. Pit bulls often attack and kill dogs, cats, and other pets. I know from first hand experience because two of them tried to kill my lab in a completely unprovoked (redundant) attack in 2018.

A perfect example of this phenomenon is the 2018 incident at the Chiang Mai, Thailand pet show. Keep in mind that pet show dogs are often trained to be highly disciplined. But even with hundreds of hours of training and discipline, a pit bull in this pet show couldn’t help itself from attacking a beautiful Siberian Husky. This completely demolishes the lie that only pit bulls with bad owners attack others.

In 2019, pit bulls accounted for 91% of fatal dog-on-dog attacks, as well as 76% of fatal attacks on cats.

If you’re still not convinced about the devastating impact of pit bulls, if you still can’t feel for the mass murdered victims of the pit bulls, you need to grow some empathy in your soul. You may be a psychopath.

Listen to pit bull survivors — and believe them​

In January 2021, 35-year-old Candis Danielson was attacked by her neighbor’s two pit bulls. According to local news, the vicious pit bulls had “dragged Danielson under the trailer and inflicted extensive damage to her legs and feet.” The woman had to get one of her feet amputated as a result of the pit bull attack.

In yet another attack that happened last year, a Kentucky man was left “pretty chewed up” after being surrounded and attacked by three pit bull. The man was hospitalized with injuries to the face, back and lower torso. The story would have been much different if it was a gang of three Chihuahuas or Shih Tzus. “You can see [injuries] on my face, on the side of my face, on my back, you know, on my bottom. Some pretty good gashes on my leg and, you know, I’ve even got some scratches on my private parts. So, I was pretty chewed up,” the victim reported.

The most heart-wrenching stories are those that involve children. Pit bulls appear to have a special affinity for stalking the smallest and most innocent of children before ambushing and tearing their necks up.

In March 2013, 14-month-old Daxton Borchardt was allowed to stay with his babysitter despite her pitbulls, because his parents believed it’s all about training. The pitbulls promptly murdered little Daxton.

Daxton’s father Jeff said that he could no longer remain silent after hearing about a toddler mauled by a pit bull in Caledonia. Before his son’s death, Jeff said that he used to believe that a dog’s behavior was determined by the way it was raised. He no longer believes this myth — an evil lie peddled by pit mommies online. “Believing the myth, ‘It’s not the breed, it’s all how you raise them,’ is what left us without a son,” Jeff said. He said he cannot forget how his son looked after the prolonged attack.

Another attack that occurred this year resulted in the death of a 6-year-old child. “I was an advocate for pit bulls and what happened today happened so fast that there was nothing that anyone could do,” the mother said as she cried.

For children who manage to survive the pit bull attacks, the trauma never stops. A three-year-old girl who suffered serious injuries and lost her eye after surviving a pit bull attack was booted out of a KFC after an employee told her grandmother that the child’s scars were “disturbing” other customers.

Bite Survivor.jpg


My proposal for common sense pit bull control​

Most of us agree at this point that it’s time to come up with a permanent solution to the pit bull question. At the same time, I recognize that not everyone wants to spend their time trekking around their state looking for adoptable pit bulls to put down.

America must implement common-sense pit bull control to rid ourselves of these dogs, and I have a series of suggestions.

1.) Like we do with so many important issues, let’s look to the laws and policies of our progressive allies. Currently, there are pit bull bans in several progressive countries, such as Canada, Denmark, France, Finland, Norway, Switzerland, and several more. If those countries are smart enough to recognize the need for common sense pit bull control, then America should follow suit.

2.) We should also regulate animal shelters who are cynically using loopholes to trick people into bringing assault-style dogs into their homes.

Currently, animal shelters are overrun with pit bulls, which is understandable considering their extremely violent nature. However, shelters don’t properly inform potential adopters that these dogs are pit bulls. Instead, animal shelters will advertise a pit bull as a “lab mix” or another “mix” breed in an attempt to deceive those looking for a friendly family dog.

Not Pits.jpg


Everyone should be able to agree that animal shelters that do this should be shut down and held accountable for the blood on their hands.

3.) Lastly, we need to tell Big Tech to remove pit mommy content as speedily and heavy-handedly as they deal with other kinds of misinformation identified by the White House as a health risk. Think vaccine misinfo, etc. We must also demand a highly visible pit bull warning attached to posts associated with persons identified as pit mommies or pit mommy adjacent.

How many more children must die? The time to act is yesterday.

Crack Pitmom.jpg
 
It took her being about five feet away from mauling me for my dad to finally knock on the neighbor's front door and tell them, "If your dog comes after my daughter again, I'm going to shoot it." So, she stayed chained to a tree in their front yard for the rest of her life, hysterically barking and growling at everyone who passed by. She was so vicious, every person walking would cross to the other side of street, because it always felt like she was going to break off her chain and kill you.
Your dad should have done the needful anyways and put a round through that pit's skull. And if the neighbor had tried to get uppity about it, then he could get a round put through his skull, too.

What do you get out of a pit bull that you can't get from a different, less aggressive breed?
Intimidation. It's why niggers and various other reprobates own them. Plenty of other dog breeds can do better what shitbulls are claimed to do, but shitbulls have the muscular bad-boy look that makes them appear more threatening. Said bad-boy look also explains why so many white women love playing Pibble Mom to the damned things.

i'd save the life of a pitbull before the life of any a&her unless it's hogan or rand pol
Said pitbull repays you by ripping your face off. You'd be safer and better off rescuing HHH's lame ass.
 
A claim so common among pitbull apologists that it ranks #2 on the most popular myths to be debunked on the site.

From a harm-minimization perspective, there is in fact a legal definition of pit bulls.
Some states have even noted in judgements that people of 'ordinary intelligence' or 'laymen' are able to recognize dogs belonging to the pitbull family.
The "you can't tell what a pitbull actually is" was tabled as a defense against the imposition of breed-specific legislation in Ohio, New Mexico and Colorado, and shot down each time.
How are they verifying its pits and not just square headed mutts (which I guarentee are actually what most of the "pit bulls" mauling people are) in the first place? If they're just going off news articles, then its worthless since journos are probably just calling any dog that's stocky and square headed a pit.

Honestly the Karens who obsessively hate pits are just as bad as the pibble mommies. None of their traits are unique to that group of breeds, there are tons of square-headed stocky breeds out there that were historically used for blood sports. It's just pointless pearl clutching. Even the racist zoomers are just using them as a stand-in for black people more than anything else.
 
Last edited:
Chihauhaus and miniature poodles are the worst dogs, pits are fine as long as they aren't fucked up poorly socialized inbred backyard breeder monstrosities.
i'd save the life of a pitbull before the life of any a&her unless it's hogan or rand pol
This is why Islam is right about women.
 
If they're just going off news articles, then its worthless since journos are probably just calling any dog that's stocky and square headed a pit.
They’re quite transparent about how they collect data.
That’s just for their own collated examples.
They also aggregate Animal Control annual report statistics, trauma center reports, and dog bite injury studies.

If you’d like to refute their collected data, you’d be better off checking out the website first. Not much point telling me they’ve got it wrong when you haven’t had a look at the site yourself.
 
How are they verifying its pits and not just square headed mutts (which I guarentee are actually what most of the "pit bulls" mauling people are) in the first place? If they're just going off news articles, then its worthless since journos are probably just calling any dog that's stocky and square headed a pit.

Honestly the Karens who obsessively hate pits are just as bad as the pibble mommies. None of their traits are unique to that group of breeds, there are tons of square-headed stocky breeds out there that were historically used for blood sports. It's just pointless pearl clutching. Even the racist zoomers are just using them as a stand-in for black people more than anything else.
Shitbull apologists who ride the "what's a pitbull? doesn't exist, can't prove it was one in this story, dog breeds aren't real" train after the regular weekly report of a dead 4-year-old remind me a lot of the people whose strategy in the 2021 elections was to repeat "there is no such thing as critical race theory, Fox News made it up" to people angry about the specific manifestations of CRT. Does that kind of total denial ever win someone over in an argument?
 
The problem isn't pitbulls.

Its NIGGERS. Niggers keep breeding them ever more vicious. They are a match made in Wewuz. Subhuman ghetto scum with a doggo to match.

Fact that Muttland doesn't do fences is another mistake that lets :
-Niggers walk onto your property.
-Dogs pitbull into your property.
-Your kid or pet running under a truck.

That said, a pitbull should always be fenced or muzzled, but it can be an okey guard dog.
 
The article claims that since a pit bull "snapped" during a dog show, this disproves the concept that a bad owner is at fault.

ANY dog owner can be a bad owner, including an owner that shows their dog professionally. So, that doesn't actually disprove the point, it just as easily proves that Show Dog Owners can be bad owners too.

I think a large chunk of the problem is "rescue" pit bulls, whose history is unknown. For all they know the dogs could have been Michael Vick'ed, or abused horribly, and if you don't know anything about where the dog came from or how it grew up, you're just taking in someone else's problem. Especially dogs that were acquired as initial "guard dogs" but weren't socialized properly. Not saying that a non-rescue pit can't "snap" (I guess they do), but I think it's way more likely for a rescue to snap than a non-rescue. That being said, rescue pit bulls with unknown or bad histories should either be given to an expert who can adequately mitigate the risks (such as muzzling) to own and keep, or put the fuck down.

Hell, rescue dogs in general are a crapshoot. One of the neighbors down the road has a black lab that's a rescue and the damn thing will bark, practically stand on its hind legs, and try to lunge at ANY OTHER person than the people that are walking it. IDK if it's an aggro lunge but of course the owner doesn't want to take any chances. Labs are mostly sweet bois so that dog must have been through HELL. I noticed it mostly does that vs. men, though.
 
Shitbull apologists who ride the "what's a pitbull? doesn't exist, can't prove it was one in this story, dog breeds aren't real"
Pitbull apologists: “Pitbulls aren’t able to be accurately or scientifically defined, so those reports are all bullshit”.
Also pitbull apologists: “Pitbulls are wonderful dogs and great with kids”.

It‘s almost as if the apologists are reserving the right to define what is and what isn’t a pitbull, specifically on the basis of whether they’re aggressive.
 
There's only two types of people that like pitbulls:
- Trailer trash, hoodrats and gypsies who use them as fighting dogs or to appear tough.
- White women who adopt them because of that classic white woman instinct that makes them think "they can change them", the same instinct that makes them swoon over vaguely attractive serial killers and rapists.
 
Its NIGGERS. Niggers keep breeding them ever more vicious. They are a match made in Wewuz. Subhuman ghetto scum with a doggo to match.
You should become racially enlightened and realize that all manifestations of the self-destructive American underclass culture are basically the same and equally worthy of contempt. Whether it's Shaneefa in the urban ghetto or Bocephus in the trailer out on Route 2 they got where they are because they're incapable of long-term thinking, have been trained to be dependent and dodge responsibility for their problems, and have no worthwhile father figure in their childhoods. And even though they "can't afford vegetables because they live in a food desert" they both spend $150 per month on dog food and other shit for their multiple loud, untrained, violent dogs that are disproportionately likely to be pitbulls.

Honestly we could simplify all of this breed legislation and sorting out the good and bad owners really easily: The only people who should ever have more than 1 dog should live on a detached property large enough to have a fenced-in dog run, that they own outright or are keeping up with mortgage payments on, and the dogs should be quiet enough that any neighbors who don't live close enough to actually see the property should not know whether they have dogs or not.

If you don't meet those conditions then any dog besides your oldest one gets shot in the head and dumped in the river. Problem solved.
 
Honestly good

Literally the only people I see who own pit bulls are hillbillies and niggers. They’re always hyper aggressive, poorly socialized and unfit to be around kids or other animals. And the autistic dog fuckers always have an excuse ready to downplay their behavior. It’s the dog equivalent of “he beez a gudboi who dindunuffins! He jus train to git his life togatha! Gnomesayin?” hood rats use for their uncivilized spawn
 
It might just be me, but I don't think you should kill an animal that hasn't done anything yet. I don't what anyone says. That shit's immoral af, and the whore is probably just a psycho who wants an excuse to murder animals without getting in trouble.

That said, the people saying toy breed attacks are a bigger deal than what a pitbull can do are just being retarded. I like pitbulls, but even I know the shit they can do is horrific.
 
Once all the pits are gone, niggers will just move on to Rottweilers.
The difference between Rottweilers and pittbulls though is Rottweilers were bred to pull carts and shepard animals while the other was just a combat dog bred for violence. I never understood why niggers took a like to them. The orginal German use for them was rather benign.
 
The difference is that tiny yippy dogs aren't mauling or killing anyone. I've been bit by my grandma's old yippy dog far more times than I can count. The thing is, their bites either don't hurt or don't hurt enough to cause damage. And if I really wanted to, I could kick or punch the crap out of that yippy dog. I can't hurt a pit bull, it's like punching a brick wall.
Dogs are mostly their genetics. The amount you can shift canine behavior through training isn’t that big. I didn’t always think this, but then I got a dog from the shelter who is a terrier mix (not a pit). I love dogs and have a lot of dog experience. Most of my previous dogs were retriever mixes, goofy, friendly, cool with other dogs, eager to please.
Reply button broken. Anyway, this just isn't true. For one thing, there are breeds that are well known for their calm nature and not acting out around kids, no matter how annoying they are. Those dog breeds are the kinds that normies need to stick with instead of a breed that is known for having been bred for killing. And I can personally attest to this with my childhood lab dog getting clawed in the face by a cat, or getting his tail pulled hard by toddlers, etc. Do you know what he did when my cousin pulled the crap out of his ear and tail? Nothing. He might have yipped or barked in annoyance. But that's it. Because he was a dog breed that is known for being great with kids.
People don't report dominance bites (snaps) from smaller dogs? Yeah- is that because they almost never break the skin, and aren't intended to injure or kill?
Whereas rottweilers, pitbulls etc, when they attack, use their much larger size and strength in persistent mauling attacks in which the dog absolutely intends to maim or kill?
A 'dangerous' breed isn't just a breed that bites. It's a breed that has the proclivity and capability to cause serious injury or death to humans, is known to attack for no apparent reason and/or without warning, and attacks persistently.

Sithraki has it correct - the danger isn't from a 'bite' in an of itself, its from a sustained, forceful attack that usually comes as a surprise. A mauling, in the lethal or near-lethal sense. Most dogs, in most circumstances, are simply not going to ever arrive at the crossroads where all the factors needed for a mauling to take place intersect - we only know of the edge cases like the Pomeranian and the infant because they are so rare. My only point of disagreement is on Rottweilers, they have a different behavior template from pit bulls and are 1000% more trustworthy.

All dogs are descended from the same basic genetic template, and the majority of breeds have been bred to communicate and coexist with humans as a kind of basic template - puppies follow human voices like their own mother's before they even open their eyes. On top of that are the various breed-specific behaviors and attitudes that are used to better suit their role, like the shepherding dogs get BOSSLAMBS.config, terriers get KILLRATS.config, and goldens gets LOVABLERETARD.config. Most dogs are going to express their behavior patterns and as long as you give your terrier lots of toys and exercise your collie and rub your golden's tummy, everything is fine. Otherwise you're going to lose a lot of pillows, find your collie herding the family on a schedule, or see your golden holding a boombox outside your window in a desperate plea for love.

When do these dogs bite? Well, because of their basic behavior template and propensity to communicate with humans, its only after they've gone through a DEFCON countdown of their own. Most dogs will practice avoidance (baby is pulling ears? walk away), posturing, vocalization, more forceful posturing and vocalization, and then contact. You're not feeling teeth as a surprise with most dogs, they will let you know where you're heading with increasingly violent growling, barking, and teeth-bearing. Some variations of dog breed, like some shepherds, exhibit nipping behavior as well at a lower DEFCON level, but thats practically a pinch and not really a bite (though they do get reported as such often).

That said, when most dogs bite, its a purely defensive, warding bite intended to make the person back off. Sometimes its not even a bite, but simply an open-mawed flailing to bat at a person with their muzzle. Typically, it is a singular bite as well, because usually the human reaction to having a growling ball of fur bite at you is to back the fuck off. These are not maulings, and typically not fatal since the bites are rarely sustained and usually are on the hands or arms. These bites are defensive and usually singular.

Pit bulls flip the script. They have been bred, and in last few decades especially since the rise of underground fighting, to murder the shit out of everything. They have had their communication and even temperament bred out of them, in favor of sociopathy and explosive, aggressive violence. Breeders have been selecting for aggression, 'gameness' and strength for long enough that most Pit Bulls are little more than murder machines looking for a trigger to go off and start attacking. They attack without warning, without going through the communication and escalation steps of other dogs, and they attack in an aggressive and ultimately fatal manner. Their behavior patterns, combined with their overall physicality, make them incredibly dangerous. Every aspect of their core being has been overwritten and perverted in the pursuit of violence, and its super disturbing.
 
It might just be me, but I don't think you should kill an animal that hasn't done anything yet. I don't what anyone says. That shit's immoral af
Sorry if I used humorous exaggeration about dogs as a rhetorical tactic in the forum where people constantly talk about liquidating races they don't like

Honestly though, the idea of "presumption of innocence" or even morality hardly applies to animals, especially if you think it's OK to kill them for food. We need to keep people safe, and even from an animal welfare perspective it's universally acknowledged that killing animals is the only solution to abuse, the resources to take them all in don't exist. Even PETA operates kill shelters. Do you think the average aggressive pitbull is being treated well by its owner? The ones I have experience living near get chained up outside in all weather.

I'd like to set the precedent that the state COULD confiscate/kill dogs based solely on the fact that people in certain social circumstances have no business wasting their time and money on them, which ideally will lead to the problem diminishing rather than a canine holocaust.
 
Pitbulls are very ugly looking dogs, they look like they have Down syndrome and I think that's why stupid women get them. They think they're cute, just like they think their small rats are cute too because of their goofy faces despite they would rather be dead because living hurts too much for them.

Pit bulls are the niggers of the dog world. Fitting that their owners are usually the type of dumb white girl that thinks she can turn a beast bred for destruction into her "sweet lil doggobaby."
That's exactly what they think about joggers too.

Once all the pits are gone, niggers will just move on to Rottweilers.
Rottweilers are smart though. I've seen the police use them and never knew they complain that they misbehave.

images (4).jpg
images (5).jpg

I've never seen them using pitbulls, though. If even the police can't train them, no one can.
 
I love dogs, including pit bulls. My neighbor has an adorable older one I love to pet whenever I see him. My heart melts whenever I pet him and he wags his tail and looks up at me with love in his eyes.

That being said, over the years my opinion on pit bulls has changed. I no longer believe it's just a training issue. I've witnessed first hand how these dogs, even the most well trained and lovable ones, can instantly snap and try to kill another person or animal. And unlike other dogs that will generally stop behaving badly when you get onto them, pit bulls don't listen and won't stop once they've snapped.

Even if it was just a training issue, the fact that a pit bull's bite does so much damage should be enough to ban them all together.

I believe that pit bulls should be banned and the ban should be heavily enforced until pit bulls no longer exist outside of professional/specialized owners. It breaks my heart to think about it, because I love animals in general and I know that these dogs can't help their nature. But I also can't pretend that they're harmless, when I have seen in person how dangerous and destructive they can be.
This. One point you missed though is the fact Pit Bulls are a plague on animal shelters. Part of the reason I had to shell out money to a breeder for a pure bred dog was that my local shelters had nothing but pit bulls and terrier mixes that were probably also pits. Legitimately good family doggos are being put down because the shelters have no room.
 
Back