I hate the Internet and the people who own it

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
why would you post about something like that on social media? you have a church if you are a woman or a pub if you are a man to meet the other parents and talk about the issue.
"Orthodox" or "Conservative" Religious groups seem to be the few remaining avenues to express your outrage but even then it's somewhat limited as the "Pastor" might be part of a larger organization that will require approval from for them to organize.

As to a local bar or restaurant?

I have lost count how many local spaces pull out at the slightest hint of public pressure. Sure you could tell your friend at the bar but you might get a handful of people to speak while your opponents get to use the power of the internet/ social media to organize.

I am not saying, it all over but I would encourage people here to move to smaller communities preferably under or at 30,000 people (at most 50,000).

Larger population tend to attract more wierdos.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Not A Skinwalker
why would you post about something like that on social media? you have a church if you are a woman or a pub if you are a man to meet the other parents and talk about the issue.
Even if you successfully form a lynch mob with your local geezers that does nothing for the rest of the world if there's an asymmetry in the levels you're allowed to talk about this stuff. Even if you help your kid today (maybe, btw, because this scenario is after-the-fact since nobody else could speak up) they're going to have to grow up and share a society with the kids from the next school over.
 
Last edited:
That would require money for a lawsuit
One could hope one of the freedom fighting NGOs would take up arms but that is an unlikely outcome given what I have seen of the current generation of formerly respectable organizations.
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Jack Awful
Posting on clear net from my phone with VPN set to the Netherlands.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Zaxamus
You say this as if there's anything else we can do. I can't think of a single technological or legal solution to this. We either have to live with this or we have to take the fight offline and start protests that scare the people responsible for this. If there's a legal or technological solution I'd love to hear it but I can't think of one.
I'm just saying Josh should keep the site up regardless if it cannot be accessed on clearnet. That is something he can do to show the trannies they can't censor us offline.
 
My only guess here is that the troons have gotten to the low-level people. Not only that, its clear that there is some glowing hands on deck on this as it is in their interest to (((secure))) the election. That and the troon contagion in the 3 letter agencies.

Plague, they name is troon. Regardless, this type of insanity is definitely one for the history books and unironically a stress test on the current infrastructure. In this case, can you keep a website up when the ministry of truth hates you?
 
I'm just saying Josh should keep the site up regardless if it cannot be accessed on clearnet. That is something he can do to show the trannies they can't censor us offline.
I don't disagree but he's talked about this repeatedly. Becoming an onion dive will wipe out 95% of the user base and replace them with fed bots spamming child flesh until the site collapses like every other darknet hangout, multiplying the work of moderating it in order to provide a minuscule fraction of the current service. The site's already in a position where it needs to grow as a business and DL doesn't want to run a charity so he's said he'll archive everything for others to take over at that point.
This concludes the kitten summary, fuck you.
 
I don't understand what's so special about this site in particular. 4chan did worse shit for years. I post way more edgy shit on RPG Codex than anything here multiple times a day. Talk.lol is 1000x more racist and has much of the same kind of content. I just don't get it.
Define "worse". Literally all these people care about is erasing all traces of information about them which they cannot control from the internet. That's why they are targeting archive sites as well.

It's not about racism or misogyny. It's about these people being able to write their own narratives and no evidence existing online to refute them.

Posting with Brave on laptop. VPN set to Indonesia.
 
The outage is affecting only Americans. This is now a mutt-free community.

Partially true. I'm in Portugal using Cloudflare's DNS (RT - for instance, is censored by my ISP - Vodafone) and can only access the Farms on TOR. TL;DR; it seems to be a DNS issue.

Also, and most importantly, much love to all Americans that love their 1st and 2nd amendments.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Botchy Galoop
Here we go again

I'll continue to make my new non Halloween pfp in the meantime, then onto the Christmas theme
 
  • Like
Reactions: Botchy Galoop
Tor seems to be working the best yet, and as I already used Brave...it's not even an inconvenience. Job. Well. Done.

Not quite annoyed enough to start voting based on the platform of "Trannies aren't human and thus get no human rights" mostly due to collateral but I'm at least willing to admit that's a card on the table.
 
Neg-rate me all you want, but at this point if I could trigger a high altitude EMP to detonate over the US, I would press the button without hesitation.

The consequences would be catastrophic and possibly hundreds of thousands would die in the ensuing chaos, loss of public infrastructure, and anarchy but I sincerely believe the US would emerge out of such a dark time a stronger country.

P.S.
I do not have any fissionable materials nor do I intend to use a Weapon of Mass Destruction (18 U.S.C. § 2332a) or commit any similar acts. My statement is purely an expression of my frustrations and a philosophical belief, that I will not take any action on. As such, it is protected under the First Amendment and DHS guidance:
The mere advocacy of political or social positions, political activism, use of strong rhetoric, or generalized philosophic embrace of violent tactics does not constitute domestic violent extremism or illegal activity and is constitutionally protected.
 
Back