I hate the Internet and the people who own it

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
It is only fair the the nazis seize the poland tld for the mega nazi triple hitler website. It is the ancestral homeland of such things.
 
Let me consult my crystal fucking ball
prophecy.png
 
So we were down on clearnet a couple hours? Great jerb ching chong wing wong ying yong cockless faggot! Eat SHIT!

Take your victory lap, you brick-faced chink. Then shit yourself, piss up a rope, and go blind.
I totally missed it. Unlike those troon fucks I work for a living.
I saw it wasnt loading, sighed and loaded TOR and saw the new domain.
Guess this is what Herr Blockenface was hinting at.
Shame it's not gonna make his mother forgive him for cutting his dick off or make his currently rotting mountaineer friend any less dead.

How long can we keep this up?
Longer than Dong Gones eyesight lasts.
 
I stopped following the Dong Gone thread. Had he been darkly hinting that we were about to be taken down?
Yeah about a week or so ago I think, said he had something he couldn't talk about but would be able to give details later.
I guess that whole 2 hours downtime was the triumphant conclusion of his gay scheme.
Shame it won't make his mother forgive him for killing his bloodline.
 
Last edited:
.kiwi is already an existing TLD and is operated by kiwis and leaf flaggots, our domains would get seized in a flash
Well shit.

OK, fine, then new plan: we'll buy it from them. Pretend to be a big fancy silicon valley tld management company and take it off their hands for ease of administration. We'll promise to be totally respectful of all the little boys, girls and takatapui of Aotearoa, and then once the ink's dry, bam, we'll sell domains to everyone and for everything. Enjoy your LizDongGoneIsAYellowNigger.kiwi!

It'll totally work. I mean, c'mon, who wouldn't trust Slobbering Dog Brands LLC?
 
How can they just take it like that? Is there no legal or civil recourse?
There is, but it would be a lawsuit between Key-Systems in Germany, Epik in the US + Jersh from his US entity in a bunch of different jurisdictions that will take years and will cost around a million USD to litigate. That will cost so much money that it isn't worth it, so hopping around domain names is a way more cost effective and faster solution.

Would love to see the Poles go full Final Solution on Germany, but it would be a complete waste of time & money. The best we can hope is that some based Polish guy living in Germany steals the car radio out of one of the Key-Systems exec their cars, or strip a bunch of copper from their office.
 
Another option,
Epik recovers the domain and then finds another vendor, cutting all ties with Key-Systems.
I know damn well I won't trust them with anything knowing they take anything you buy offline due to calls from troons.
 
How can they just take it like that? Is there no legal or civil recourse?
From the perspective of ICANN, you don't "own" a domain. While the following quote is in relation to a question about paying for a domain and "holding" it indefinitely, it still outlines the attitude they have towards it:
Remember, paying to register a domain name is not the same as "buying" it outright or permanently. You do not "own" a domain name. What you are doing is more like leasing the domain name from the registry operator that the domain name is associated with. (source)
Ultimately, it is sort of true -- you are just "leasing" a piece of the .pl TLD. Without the registry (NASK) operating the DNS servers for that TLD, in the current DNS system there would be no way to get to the nameservers for your domain (and thus, to the IP addresses for that domain). That's why the fees are recurring, because those servers don't pay for themselves.

Now, of course, there is the registrar (Key Systems) between the Farms & NASK, but it doesn't really chance the equation much. The registrar-registry agreements (you can find a couple examples online, they're actually quite simple) don't really say much about what registrars ultimately can and can't do, it mainly just outlines that the registry will provide the APIs, the registrar has to have an agreement with the registrant, ensure accuracy of WHOIS info, etc. So basically, there's nothing stopping KS from having some clause that lets them terminate for harassment or whatever else. These vague "AUP violations" essentially put us in the same situation as with the Tier 1 providers. While there's likely a special agreement between Epik & KS, I'm doubtful that it has anything that overrides KS's policies. To my knowledge there has not been a legal case that affords domain registrants any rights beyond this. Until there is one, whether it's right or not, this is how it is.

What I'm not so sure about, however, is where this leaves the domain. Presumably, it depends on how the .pl registry sees this -- if they also feel it is some sort of violation (or they just defer the opinion on that to the registrar), then it's fucked. If they just feel that "well, the registrar can refuse service to whoever they want", I don't see why it couldn't eventually get moved to someone else, whether that be by Epik choosing a different intermediate, or Null going to someone else.
 
Last edited:
Back