Law "Identity fraud": Proposed Texas state law would make identifying as transgender a felony

Story by Alex Galbraith • 2d • 2 min read
1741470401114.jpeg
Texas state capitol Brandon Bell/Getty Images

The Texas state legislature may soon consider whether transgender Texans can be charged with a felony for identifying as their preferred gender.

A bill proposed by Houston-area Rep. Tom Oliverson asks to amend the state penal code to create a new crime of "gender identity fraud." Under the act, a person could be charged with a felony for "identifying the person's biological sex as the opposite of the biological sex assigned to the person at birth" while dealing with either government entities or employers. The charge carries a punishment of up to two years in prison and a $10,000 fine.

Oliverson's name is regularly affixed to some of the most hateful legislation coming out of the Lone Star State. He authored the state House's version of a bill to ban gender-affirming care for minors in the state. That bill was signed into law in the summer of 2023 and took effect later that year. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has since sued several doctors for allegedly providing care to transgender youth.

While the bill doesn't have a co-sponsor or any planned hearings in the legislature as of this writing, it's one small piece of continued attacks on trans people in red states and nationally.

Late last year, the Texas Department of Public Safety announced that it would not change sex markers on state-issued driver's licenses for any reason other than "clerical errors." Upon taking office, President Donald Trump floated a raft of anti-trans executive orders that barred transgender people from the United States military and ordered the federal government to cease recognition of transgender and nonbinary identities.

That's not to say that conservatives are racking up easy wins. Trump's decrees have been countered with a barrage of lawsuits and judge's orders, and the removal of references to transgender people on Stonewall National Monument's webpage led to protests outside of the storied LGBTQ+ landmark.

L|A
 
Under the act, a person could be charged with a felony for "identifying the person's biological sex as the opposite of the biological sex assigned to the person at birth" while dealing with either government entities or employers.
I assume this more practically refers to law enforcement, to avoid things like recording rape and assaults as being committed by dainty womenses.

Wow they really are getting the world they insisted they lived in, huh.
 
“Sex is different to gender!” They yelled
And now the distinction has been made official they’re mad.
Also lol at “being trans is a felon” no, having official identity documents be false is the crime here. A few rarely seen documents shouldn’t stop your trans joy lmao
 
My feeling is that we've all been made to pander to this mental derangement for too long and going along with it is what's brought us to where we are today.

This cult needs to be gutted and people given the option of either growing up in the same world we do, or spending time in jail (the proper one) until they decide they can bring themselves to live in the society that everyone else does.
 
Last edited:
Would this help turn Dallas into less of a shithole? Maybe there is a chance, both with this and all the good work ICE is doing.
you'd need a real rain to come and wash away the scum and trash in order to even make a dent in dallas.
 
Oliverson's name is regularly affixed to some of the most hateful legislation coming out of the Lone Star State. He authored the state House's version of a bill to ban gender-affirming care for minors in the state.
A law to stop some retard parent from mutilating their child who was convinced to do it by some fat, middle-aged, balding discord moderator in WA/OR/CA trying to fly them out doesn't sound so hateful to me. These idiots are so completely out of touch, and if this is 'hateful' then I have no idea what they would have said if they were alive when lynchings were more common.
 
I think this is a bit extreme, but tbh and tbf, we did warn these people this would happen. We fucking told them to stay away from kids and just keep it toned down. People didn't care that some guy decided to wear a wig and a dress until they pushed actual legislations to force us to call them women and promote degeneracy for children.
 
Wait so we're just bringing back the three garment rule?
I think this is a bit extreme
All it means is you can't tell the government or your employer you're a woman if you weren't born with a uterus. It's not like they're banning crossdressing (yet).
Full text here. It's barely more than a paragraph.
 
All it means is you can't tell the government or your employer you're a woman if you weren't born with a uterus. It's not like they're banning crossdressing (yet).
Full text here. It's barely more than a paragraph.
Lol highly doubt these types would happy with someone going "teehee I'm a boy" while presenting full femme
 
Back