Insurrection 2021

[Gustav Schuchardt]

You, ralph's a-logs are in the same level of exceptionalism with the fans of ralph.

We're not a-logs! We are friendly spirits guiding Ralph on the path to enlightenment.

 

[Revo]

We're not a-logs! We are friendly spirits guiding Ralph on the path to enlightenment.

Well you could say the same thing with the users who used to post often on The Entersphere board , because according to your logic people who used to post on that board are also "friendly spirits guiding Mr.Enter on the path to enlightenment".

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

tl;dr "i dont have proof biden won fairly"

tl;dr: I never watched the video and thus can't provide timestamps and specific claims because I have no evidence. Also I am still waiting for you to prove that you don't fuck cats. Your DNA claim won't work because you're an autist who doesn't know how DNA works

 

[murdered meat bag]

tl;dr: I never watched the video and thus can't provide timestamps and specific claims because I have no evidence. Also I am still waiting for you to prove that you don't fuck cats. Your DNA claim won't work because you're an autist who doesn't know how DNA works

Suspected NorCal Rapist ‘Can't Explain' Why DNA Found at Crime Scenes (msn.com)

lol.

Your requests have been filled. But you thought it couldn't be so now you flounder, soon you'll be posting "i was just trolling lulz the trumpies are mad".

 

[FunPosting101]

The Electoral College voted and Biden got 306. That's a fair win.



Luckily, no one cares about your opinion. You can wake up and scream "Fraud" every day for the next 4 years of the Biden presidency and it won't even matter.

When your guy gets cheated out of a win, remember that you made this post.

 

[Aidan]

Right like a pedophilic orange skinned geriatric reality tv show host who throws baby tantrums and sucks Russian cocks even while they hack us got the 2ND most votes in history is a more believable result.


Youre going in the camp. Just waiting on Uncle Joes signal.

>muh russia
please stop, the main takeaway from the congressional investigation was facebook ads bought by russians, not hacks. if you want to continue the claim of russian hacks swaying the election then say what they hacked and what they did with it
inb4 emails

 

[Gustav Schuchardt]

please stop, the main takeaway from the congressional investigation was facebook ads bought by russians, not hacks.

Yeah, it was all completely half-assed too

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/hayesbrown/russia-promoted-buff-bernie-sanders-coloring-book
https://archive.vn/E5P43

The ad was one of several released on Tuesday from the Democrats of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, which is investigating Russia's interference in the 2016 election.

According to the ad's metadata, it cost 114 rubles, was aimed at people 18 — 65 in the US, and was clicked on by only about 54 people. Not a huge con, but enough of one.

So they spent 114 RUB (1.53 USD) on an ad that reached 54 people. And you can see from the screenshot it got 40 reactions, 2 comments and 3 shares.

There's a list of them here

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/01/us/politics/russia-2016-election-facebook.html
https://archive.vn/N6AV8

I've picked the sort of sources the left like, i.e. Buzzfeed and the NYT, in order to reach out to them in a bipartisan and collegial way.

 

[King's Gambit Accepted]

of course they wouldn't. the ballots are suss. as RAE and HHH have pointed out the illegal ballots are mixed in with legal ones so the only option is to throw out the entire vote.

yes, i'm agreeing that we both have the burden of proof. my burden is fulfilled by the videos you refuse to watch.

What is your proof "illegal" ballots are mixed in with legal ones? Can you prove even A SINGLE vote was cast by someone who was not eligible to vote?

 

[Aidan]

What is your proof "illegal" ballots are mixed in with legal ones? Can you prove even A SINGLE vote was cast by someone who was not eligible to vote?

Pretty sure the most recent post in the voter fraud megathread is about a Trump voter voting on behalf of the dead.

 

[King's Gambit Accepted]

Pretty sure the most recent post in the voter fraud megathread is about a Trump voter voting on behalf of the dead.

Yes, the dumbasss in PA. To be safe, we should throw out all Trump votes in PA, I suppose.

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

Suspected NorCal Rapist ‘Can't Explain' Why DNA Found at Crime Scenes (msn.com)

lol.

Your requests have been filled. But you thought it couldn't be so now you flounder, soon you'll be posting "i was just trolling lulz the trumpies are mad".

Lol my requests weren't filled. I asked you for a timestamp and what I should be looking for, but you're refusing to give it. Instead you just linked to a 12 and 3 hour video, without giving me any time stamps. I ain't got time to watch that shit. Also, a senate hearing isn't evidence, lol. Ron Johnson was laughed out of the senate by the other senators because he's a retard who doesn't know how courts work.

Your DNA thing is comparing apples in oranges. You said to DNA test every cat, however, having sex doesn't change DNA, so that's not gonna matter. However, your semen could be found in the cats, which would be different. But that's not a DNA test, that's completely different. Also, you can have sex with a condom and your DNA won't be found in the woman. So your DNA idea is completely wrong. You really aren't good at science, are you?

In summary: If you fuck a woman without a condom, your DNA will be inside her. However, with a condom, that won't be the case. That also won't change her DNA, so a DNA test doesn't mean anything. You'd have to check her for your DNA within a few hours of having sex.

---

What's more likely:
1. Senators, lawyers, every court, the supreme court, state governments, etc.. are lying and only Trump, a known conman, is telling the truth
OR
2. Trump is lying.

Apparently you believe the word of the 75 year old career conman that you simp for over actual lawyers and judges, and well, I remember my first love, too.

 

[Aidan]

Yes, the dumbasss in PA. To be safe, we should throw out all Trump votes in PA, I suppose.

You asked for a SINGLE vote and got it. You can find evidence of individual voter fraud in any major election, I'm sure. The real question is whether there was enough fraud to notably change the election, particularly the outcome.

 

[King's Gambit Accepted]

You asked for a SINGLE vote and got it. You can find evidence of individual voter fraud in any major election, I'm sure. The real question is whether there was enough fraud to notably change the election, particularly the outcome.

As far as I know, that's the only vote proven to have been fraudulently cast.

Yes, of course, but the Qtards are going to be around regardless.

 

[murdered meat bag]

What is your proof "illegal" ballots are mixed in with legal ones? Can you prove even A SINGLE vote was cast by someone who was not eligible to vote?

multiple judges have said that there's no way to find the alleged illegal ballots because they're mixed in with the legal ones, and the courts won't throw out all the ballots just because the alleged illegal ballots were in there. WISC is one such case.

Lol my requests weren't filled. I asked you for a timestamp and what I should be looking for, but you're refusing to give it. Instead you just linked to a 12 and 3 hour video, without giving me any time stamps. I ain't got time to watch that shit. Also, a senate hearing isn't evidence, lol. Ron Johnson was laughed out of the senate by the other senators because he's a retard who doesn't know how courts work.

why can't make an affirmative defense for biden winning legitimately? oh because he won by fraud:

Where exactly should I be looking? I ain't reading through all that shit. You are the one posting the link, so you should be able to tell me exactly what to look for.

Your DNA thing is comparing apples in oranges. You said to DNA test every cat, however, having sex doesn't change DNA, so that's not gonna matter. However, your semen could be found in the cats, which would be different. But that's not a DNA test, that's completely different. Also, you can have sex with a condom and your DNA won't be found in the woman. So your DNA idea is completely wrong. You really aren't good at science, are you?

In summary: If you fuck a woman without a condom, your DNA will be inside her. However, with a condom, that won't be the case. That also won't change her DNA, so a DNA test doesn't mean anything. You'd have to check her for your DNA within a few hours of having sex.

thanks addressing things i'm not claiming. but i understand why you're being obtuse, i would be too if i had to defend "biden won legitimately". it's an impossible statement to prove which is why you make excuses and move goalposts.

---

What's more likely:
1. Senators, lawyers, every court, the supreme court, state governments, etc.. are lying and only Trump, a known conman, is telling the truth
OR
2. Trump is lying.

Apparently you believe the word of the 75 year old career conman that you simp for over actual lawyers and judges, and well, I remember my first love, too.

why would courts dismiss on procedure and not merits? if trump is lying it'd be easy to dismiss his cases for being factually erroneous and not because he filed them too early, on time or too late.
and once again, we dance the dance of unbreakable logic:

"trump is lying" is a positive statement that has the burden of proof.

 

[King's Gambit Accepted]

multiple judges have said that there's no way to find the alleged illegal ballots because they're mixed in with the legal ones, and the courts won't throw out all the ballots just because the alleged illegal ballots were in there. WISC is one such case.

Can you quote the actual legal text?

 

[Aidan]

As far as I know, that's the only vote proven to have been fraudulently cast.

Yes, of course, but the Qtards are going to be around regardless.

You're dumb if you think there was only one instance of voter fraud in any election. Arguing there's no fraud at all is just putting blinders on.

 

[King's Gambit Accepted]

You're dumb if you think there was only one instance of voter fraud in any election. Arguing there's no fraud at all is just putting blinders on.

Obviously, there's small instances of fraud in every election.

But if you're arguing millions of fraudulent ballots were cast, either show proof or stfu.

Voter records are public -- if millions of dead people voted, it should be easy show. The few dead people that supposedly voted were proven to be well and alive and Tucker Carlson had to issue a retraction.

The one and only case proved so far was an illegal vote for Trump. Biden has a stronger case for claiming voter fraud than Trump.

 

[Aidan]

Obviously, there's small instances of fraud in every election.

But if you're arguing millions of fraudulent ballots were cast, either show proof or stfu.

Voter records are public -- if millions of dead people voted, it should be easy show. The few dead people that supposedly voted were proven to be well and alive and Tucker Carlson had to issue a retraction.

You need to pick a track and stay on it.
I haven't argued anything with you except that it's dumb to think no voter fraud took place, which you implied by asking for evidence of a single fraudulent vote in this election.

I've been too busy to keep up with current claims and have said why I'm curious about the election already in this thread. One of the best (worst) things I saw was in a Michigan hearing, this crazy Democrat lady had one of the witnesses of voter fraud spell her first, last, and maiden name and then told people on social media they know what to do that same day. Shit's wild.

 

[King's Gambit Accepted]

You need to pick a track and stay on it.
I haven't argued anything with you except that it's dumb to think no voter fraud took place, which you implied by asking for evidence of a single fraudulent vote in this election.

I've been too busy to keep up with current claims and have said why I'm curious about the election already in this thread. One of the best (worst) things I saw was in a Michigan hearing, this crazy Democrat lady had one of the witnesses of voter fraud spell her first, last, and maiden name and then told people on social media they know what to do that same day. Shit's wild.

Can you provide proof of a single fraudulent vote for Biden? Didn't think so.

You mean the hearing with the alcoholic?

 

[Aidan]

You're a caricature.