Insurrection 2021

What's going to happen on January 6th?

  • TRUMP JUNTA GOVERNMENT

    Votes: 40 10.1%
  • CHICOM BIDEN ROUNDUP

    Votes: 18 4.5%
  • BOOMERS STANDING AROUND IN Q MERCH ACCOMPLISHING NOTHING

    Votes: 340 85.4%

  • Total voters
    398
  • Poll closed .
I love how it only took one lost election for the Right to turn into everything they accused the Left of being for 4 years.
It's just trying to explain election day to month
explaining the power of the courts
does the main stream media confirm a election
how far you can go from not cosceding an election with constitution
explaining mail in voting vs absentee
a lot of questions but, main answer for the election bidden won trump lost by the court saying they don't want to hear it
 
I find it hard to correlate Trump hatred for Biden support, Bidens livestreams even get low view numbers. If you hated Trump that much and weren't keen on Biden wouldn't there be some sort of record third party turnout? Supposedly Biden outperformed Obama, the "Black Jesus" as some put in his heyday.

What I'm seeing in the statistics and what I see on the ground doesn't seem to match up in conventional wisdom. And yet, no court wants to take the case, so it makes me lose faith in the system, as they aren't willing to give time to investigate an obvious statistical anomaly. If people feel disenfranchised by the system, shouldn't the system regain that trust by proving they are transparent? But no one is interested. Youtube bans videos for talk of election rigging. Now I'm not saying that's proof, but it's sure suspicious.
Not at all. People hate Trump, so they vote for the guy who is going to beat him. People who hate Trump won't vote third party because those candidates have zero chance of winning. If you hate Trump, you vote Biden. Conventional wisdom is usually wrong, especially when you don't know what the hell you're even looking at. How do you prove that they're transparent to your liking? You conspiracy nuts are never satisfied; Jesus himself could come down from the heavens and tell you it was a fair election and you'd still deny it, all because Daddy Trump said so.

And yeah, I am sure it's a huge worldwide conspiracy that involves big tech and every judge in the US, and the only one telling the truth is the career conman. You seriously can't be this naive and autistic

But wearing a mask doesnt help. I've gone through this discussion before but if you wanna go for it again ill be quite happy to tear you to shreds.
Who knows more about whether masks word, the CDC, WHO and nearly every scientist and medical doctor in the world, or some autist who thinks he is emperor of Kiwi Farms? That's a tough one.
 
Who knows more about whether masks word, the CDC, WHO and nearly every scientist and medical doctor in the world, or some autist who thinks he is emperor of Kiwi Farms? That's a tough one.

“MASKS DONT HELP” essentially boils down to a belief that if something is not 100% effective at doing the thing then it’s useless.

Masks don’t stop the virus 100% of the time so they don’t help, clearly. Even though it’s proven through basic fucking common sense that given that the virus is contained in moisture droplets in your breath, if you catch most of the droplets coming out of your body, you reduce the chances of the virus being inhaled by other people around you.

But it doesn’t completely stop it, so clearly it’s useless.

So I propose a new way of doing things to cater to these people: Theres no way to guarantee a nuclear plant won’t melt down, so let’s stop with all safety protocols. There’s no way to guarantee a car crash won’t kill you, so get rid of speed limits and seat belts. There’s no way to guarantee that your CPU won’t overheat, so leave the CPU exposed to open air and get rid of your computers cooling system. There’s no way to guarantee that a bullet won’t penetrate body armor, so let’s have all our Troops in to battle naked.

After all, if safety measures don’t work 100% of the time, they clearly don’t help at all, and we shouldn’t even bother.
 
Check the date on that, retard. It's from March 30th. They've changed stances a loooong time ago. This is tough for you MAGAtards to understand since you don't like them book lernins, but as new data comes in, scientists will change their view if said new viewpoint is supported by the new data.

It's common sense to expect masks to work if you don't take into account that you are going out in public, touching door handles and then touching your mask to put it on and off. Taken in totality it's almost assured that they do not cause a net reduction in disease spread.
Masks are more to protect asymptomatic people from spreading it to others. It's really not a tough concept. I know you're slow but you can get this. They're not 100% effective, but every bit to slow the spread helps a lot.
 
It's common sense to expect masks to work if you don't take into account that you are going out in public, touching door handles and then touching your mask to put it on and off. Taken in totality it's almost assured that they do not cause a net reduction in disease spread.

Wash your fucking hands then, nigger.

And it’s not supposed to ensure you don’t catch it, it’s to reduce as much as possible the chance of you spreading it before you know you have it if you do catch it. If the masks catches most of the moisture droplets in your breath that contain the virus, then the amount you put on to things and in to the air is reduced and the chances of somebody else catching it from you goes way down

You act like the mask is the end all be all of this shit when it’s just one of the simple and easy to do things being asked of people, but because they couldn’t even do that, now it’s a major issue and it’s everybody’s fucking problem.
 
“MASKS DONT HELP” essentially boils down to a belief that if something is not 100% effective at doing the thing then it’s useless.

Masks don’t stop the virus 100% of the time so they don’t help, clearly. Even though it’s proven through basic fucking common sense that given that the virus is contained in moisture droplets in your breath, if you catch most of the droplets coming out of your body, you reduce the chances of the virus being inhaled by other people around you.

But it doesn’t completely stop it, so clearly it’s useless.

So I propose a new way of doing things to cater to these people: Theres no way to guarantee a nuclear plant won’t melt down, so let’s stop with all safety protocols. There’s no way to guarantee a car crash won’t kill you, so get rid of speed limits and seat belts. There’s no way to guarantee that your CPU won’t overheat, so leave the CPU exposed to open air and get rid of your computers cooling system. There’s no way to guarantee that a bullet won’t penetrate body armor, so let’s have all our Troops in to battle naked.

After all, if safety measures don’t work 100% of the time, they clearly don’t help at all, and we shouldn’t even bother.
I think the bigger issue is people who are sick are walking into towns and spreading the virus despite having masks. This is different from say a seat belt or something else, and why there is a rise of cases AFTER many states had mask mandates. Instead of encouraging the sick to stay home, the sick can now believe this will prevent the spread when they are still spreading the sickness to others in larger numbers which is why in many mask mandate states the numbers jumped in the thousands when before it was under 200. (Talking from my own area.)

Basically it keeps spreading because instead of staying home the sick believe this will prevent it, and it must be worse off than we thought since many mandate states are having dramatic rises in cases. It's a lot different from the seatbelt analogy where although not perfect there isn't a surprise rise of cases of vehicular deaths after surviving the crash or a spread of them.
 

It's common sense to expect masks to work if you don't take into account that you are going out in public, touching door handles and then touching your mask to put it on and off. Taken in totality it's almost assured that they do not cause a net reduction in disease spread.
WHO & CDC are Allowed to be contraian from day to day . - Moral or Science be dammed
Same for politicans to a point.
 
0.png
 
Who knows more about whether masks word, the CDC, WHO and nearly every scientist and medical doctor in the world, or some autist who thinks he is emperor of Kiwi Farms? That's a tough one.
You still didnt address the arguments i made so i guess some autist who thinks he is emperor of Kiwi Farms knows more. Now bow down you autistic plebeian.

Check the date on that, retard. It's from March 30th. They've changed stances a loooong time ago. This is tough for you MAGAtards to understand since you don't like them book lernins, but as new data comes in, scientists will change their view if said new viewpoint is supported by the new data.


Masks are more to protect asymptomatic people from spreading it to others. It's really not a tough concept. I know you're slow but you can get this. They're not 100% effective, but every bit to slow the spread helps a lot.
Id argue that they are 0 percent effective due to the wider public not being versed in proper sanitation protocols for them to actually have some effect, and that they are helping the spread in some cases due to that.
 
Id argue that they are 0 percent effective due to the wider public not being versed in proper sanitation protocols for them to actually have some effect, and that they are helping the spread in some cases due to that.

I'd wager it happens something like this most the time...

Person is going to store, has their mask on like a good little mask wearer.
Person touches surface a sick person touched while shopping.
Person goes to car removes mask, scratches face, rubs eye, picks nose, and bam they are infected.

From there they keep wearing that same covid covered mask for the next few days till they get sick while their hands get covered in it every time they touch the mask and spread it around to any surface they touch.
 
I'd wager it happens something like this most the time...

Person is going to store, has their mask on like a good little mask wearer.
Person touches surface a sick person touched while shopping.
Person goes to car removes mask, scratches face, rubs eye, picks nose, and bam they are infected.

From there they keep wearing that same covid covered mask for the next few days till they get sick while their hands get covered in it every time they touch the mask and spread it around to any surface they touch.
Its just common sense which i guess many people in this thread just refuse to excercise. Maybe they think the mask makes all the things it blocks magically dissapear. If anything it's a concentrated and more potent source if used incorrectly.
 
Last edited:
I don't really understand how it is possible that there would be people on this forum who would be unironically circlejerking for Biden (of all people); as little as a year ago, this probably would have been unheard of.
Mocking Trumpers' cope,tardrage and delusion doesn't mean liking Biden.
Check the date on that, retard. It's from March 30th. They've changed stances a loooong time ago. This is tough for you MAGAtards to understand since you don't like them book lernins, but as new data comes in, scientists will change their view if said new viewpoint is supported by the new data.


Masks are more to protect asymptomatic people from spreading it to others. It's really not a tough concept. I know you're slow but you can get this. They're not 100% effective, but every bit to slow the spread helps a lot.
These guys are trying to use the Dems saying retarded shit when the virus first hit to justify Trump's utter failure to take the pandemic seriously for half a year.
 
These guys are trying to use the Dems saying retarded shit when the virus first hit to justify Trump's utter failure to take the pandemic seriously for half a year.
None have been able to give a realistic option that the president had for taking the pandemic "seriously"

Biden's only suggestion was a federal mask mandate, which wouldn't do squat considering mask mandates do nothing to the statistical infection rate, and it would also be blatantly unconstitutional and would be immediately halted by a federal judge

Like what was the gameplan here? Detention camps for foreign travelers? Withholding federal funding for states that ease their lockdown? Not being mean to Fauci on twitter?
 
None have been able to give a realistic option that the president had for taking the pandemic "seriously"

Biden's only suggestion was a federal mask mandate, which wouldn't do squat considering mask mandates do nothing to the statistical infection rate, and it would also be blatantly unconstitutional and would be immediately halted by a federal judge

Like what was the gameplan here? Detention camps for foreign travelers? Withholding federal funding for states that ease their lockdown? Not being mean to Fauci on twitter?
Trump should have built a wall and stopped travel with all Asian countries followed by every country that didn't do the same. Instead he played golf. SAD!
 
None have been able to give a realistic option that the president had for taking the pandemic "seriously"

Biden's only suggestion was a federal mask mandate, which wouldn't do squat considering mask mandates do nothing to the statistical infection rate, and it would also be blatantly unconstitutional and would be immediately halted by a federal judge

Like what was the gameplan here? Detention camps for foreign travelers? Withholding federal funding for states that ease their lockdown? Not being mean to Fauci on twitter?
Yes to all & shaming judges that disagree .
como in new york getting hit by court only after amy barret came in said no to skewed lockdown requirements for churchs.
trump already open the pandora box on jan 20 biden going label the covid #_ as national emergercy same way that trump did with borderwall divert funds to covid programs .
after that it in the air what happeneds :?::?:
 
Last edited:
  • Autistic
Reactions: fag0t
Back