- Joined
- Mar 17, 2019
ah, yes, "threats to the world" like the people actually fighting ISISFrom what I’ve seen, it’s because Trump actually goes after who can be seen as threats to the world instead of treating them as “the JV team”.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
ah, yes, "threats to the world" like the people actually fighting ISISFrom what I’ve seen, it’s because Trump actually goes after who can be seen as threats to the world instead of treating them as “the JV team”.
Yep. Just because you'll bend over backwards to make excuses for this shit doesn't mean everyone is a cuck, stop projecting.I hope everyone bitching about Trump's use of drones voiced these same concerns for the past decade. I mean that but somehow I think no one bringing that up actually cares about the use of drones.
Yeah he was so unexcited for it he gave the military complete control of everything. (quick mention Obama again because EVERYONE who hates Trump loves Obama obviously)Regardless, you're missing the point people (myself included) are trying to make in that the Trump admin was less excited to keep bodies overseas than any president for a long time now. You're repeating the exact same talking points Bush advocates used from 2008 onwards because Obama ramped up drone strikes, which conveniently ignores the fact that drones are becoming more plentiful, common, and convenient, with time.
This isn't going to surprise you but that isn't the point anyone is making and not only do Trump supporters not care, almost no one in the US actually cares. The only reason people pretended to care, causing Obama to try to feign transparency, is that he was being more openly called out on it internationally. Funny how that EO came about in 2016 as well when the bulk of his strikes were all said and done.
Get that man a Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts.
Fortunately Biden is notoriously against using the military to kill brown people thousands of miles away so the world will be a much better place come January.
Trump is the least pro-war president we've had in my life and I liked that. He's very much against more boots on the ground abroad.
inb4 missile strikes
inb4 solemani
inb4 something something north korea
inb4 some quote
He didn't put troops on the receiving end of nonsense. I'd rather some loud mouth say "fuck around and find out" and nothing happens than "We are a country of peace" while increasing military presence somewhere or conducting drone strikes at the same time.
Not a fan of the spending, though.
We didn't have Shillary or Gore actively claiming they actually won (if you bring up Russiagate, you're a retard who didn't pay attention to what was actually being argued) and fighting against the election results on and on and on, on increasingly fantastical and threadbare premises, with no end in sight save Trump being run out on a rail on the 20th (and he might make a couple of attempts afterwards). Trying to equivocate between Trump's behavior now and Gore's in 2000 and Hillary's in 2016 shows a very short-sighted and naive understanding of American politics.Yeah, because saying the election was the result of cheating is unheard of in american politics. Everyone accepted the electoral outcome in 2016, and 2000, etc.
If you think an army of armed civilians are going to begin an armed insurrection in a week you've lost it.
We're in the same boat on 1st and 2nd gripes with the Obama admin, and I say that because I have talked about it for years and I run into two types of people. Right-leaning "fuck those hajis!" types and left-leaning "Oh my gosh that's terrible! I cannot believe that he'd do that, do you have any sources to share?" This is in person and they're skeptical that I'm not just shitting on Obama. Provide literally any link and they just pretend it's so disgusting then they change the subject.I've been against the use of drones since I first became politically-active and it was the thing about Obama's presidency I hated second-most (the first being his expansion of executive branch powers). The fact you say that no one actually cares about drone warfare in the US is just a cynical defensive reflex.
Feel free to share who you're quoting. I'm pretty sure you keep reading my posts the way you want instead of just for what they are.My favorite thing about Trump is he reduced our military intervention overseas. Oh wait what's that? He didn't and you have pages of proof? Well no one really cares about that shit anyways lol, fuck Obama and Biden.
Sure, sureWe didn't have Shillary or Gore actively claiming they actually won
Hillary Clinton is not pursuing any litigation in courts and is being an asshurt sore loser in that interview. She can't walk back her formal concession (something Trump has yet to do, and is on record as saying that he'll never do; although his word isn't exactly a sealing pact)., and she's not claiming she actually won (something Trump is doing) Talk is cheap in politics, and Trump has pursued this beyond a pissy sore-loser grumbling four years after the fact.
From what I've seen he rubber stamped drone strikes and troop numbers then hid the numbers when shit got messy and all the people making excuses for him are just as pathetic as the people who would excuse the same shit when Obama did it but not for Trump.
Obama's droning of Islamists reminds me of a Deng Xiaoping quoteI've been against the use of drones since I first became politically-active and it was the thing about Obama's presidency I hated second-most (the first being his expansion of executive branch powers). The fact you say that no one actually cares about drone warfare in the US is just a cynical defensive reflex.
Because as you admitted her situation isn't the same as now. In 2016 she wasn't the incumbent candidate. Obama had to leave no matter who won. The senate and house went to the GOP. The extra time it took for her to concede the election outcome was likely looking at potential ways to approach the election result. You think the immediate calls for impeachment wasn't a way to overturn the election result. The calls to impeach Trump was almost immediate after the inauguration.Hillary Clinton is not pursuing any litigation in courts and is being an asshurt sore loser in that interview. She can't walk back her formal concession (something Trump has yet to do, and is on record as saying that he'll never do; although his word isn't exactly a sealing pact)., and she's not claiming she actually won (something Trump is doing) Talk is cheap in politics, and Trump has pursued this beyond a pissy sore-loser grumbling four years after the fact.
Well according to certain people if Trump doesn't concede by then Trump fanatics are going to fill the Potomac with bloodWho's gonna get the coal on January 6th besides white college students
Antifa/BLM.Who's gonna get the coal on January 6th besides white college students
But what about if there are attack dogs that can be put on a leash? I feel like we could be on a verge of a Cultural Revolution soon.Antifa/BLM.
They have been the militant arm of the side seeking complete power, and if the Democrats obtain the Senate - which I expect them to do using the Dominion machines - those groups will get the SA treatment as useful idiots often receive once they are no longer needed.
Did you just unironically post a fucking Quartering video to make a point? Holy shit
I just know Pennsylvania isn't.Who's gonna get the coal on January 6th besides white college students
Uh he's based and redpilled gamer who speaks the truth.Did you just unironically post a fucking Quartering video to make a point? Holy shit![]()
just giving credit to quater pownder but still takeing the information for the issue of full delet of johny depp .Did you just unironically post a fucking Quartering video to make a point? Holy shit![]()
lol Trump's spent four years having his FBI arrest anyone who fights back against antifa, retardAntifa/BLM.
They have been the militant arm of the side seeking complete power, and if the Democrats obtain the Senate - which I expect them to do using the Dominion machines - those groups will get the SA treatment as useful idiots often receive once they are no longer needed.
BASED quarterpounder is the pinnacle of political commentary, you swineDid you just unironically post a fucking Quartering video to make a point? Holy shit![]()
Hillary Clinton is not pursuing any litigation in courts and is being an asshurt sore loser in that interview. She can't walk back her formal concession (something Trump has yet to do, and is on record as saying that he'll never do; although his word isn't exactly a sealing pact)., and she's not claiming she actually won (something Trump is doing) Talk is cheap in politics, and Trump has pursued this beyond a pissy sore-loser grumbling four years after the fact.
Pounder only takes Depp's side because it fits his agenda. He defended Harvey Fucking Weinstein for the same reason's he's defending Depp he just lucked out on the coin flip to end up on the right side for once. Weinstein "actually pretty based" for the record according to Pounder.just giving credit to quater pownder but still takeing the information for the issue of full delet of johny depp .
Thats just scummy from netflix.