You know, you were the only one in that hugbox leak other than the guy into hairless chastity incest porn to so much as mention me, with the claim that I'm "so easy to bait."
I'm very touched to count a southern european welfare leech among my most dedicated fans.
You also had a drunken woman testify before a different state's congressional committee under oath who proceeded to make completely unsupported claims and spout utter nonsense at the officials which failed to find support a single time.
Perjury is tried much more harshly before a court, which this is not - the Georgia judicial committee has several people on it who have been giving Trump a very, very strong benefit of the doubt to the point where they have ordered the various recounts and signature audits (Fulton is now also getting one, I believe). So of course they'll take what this guy says "very, very seriously" despite the fact that his testimony hinges on you taking it at face value.
As Hulkster pointed out, he both has to prove that he can change something on the machine, that there would somehow not be a record of that change, and that no other records of the poll listing exist whatsoever. That's all an extreme, extreme stretch. Given the testimony:
Referring to a system as "having wifi" would pretty retarded, so it sounds like he's referencing "the poll pad." What's a poll pad? Looks like a
computer tablet with a copy of the voter list to speed up verification.
Ah, and here's the wikipedia on that
funny catscan device. Look at that! Pulitzer did make it after all.
So viola, it took about three minutes of reading to verify most of 311's argument.
TeamViewer can be used to pretty easily yeet your way into a system if an old idiot installs it, but I don't see the smoking gun just yet for its installation.
You should also look into just what
Mister Pulitzer's fix is. He's got a magic machine that will tell you what's real and what's not.