🐱 Interesting clickbait, op-eds, fluff pieces and other smaller stories

CatParty
102943266-caitlyn.530x298.jpg


http://www.cnbc.com/2015/08/24/caitlyn-jenner-halloween-costume-sparks-social-media-outrage-.html

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/ne...een-costume-labeled-817515?utm_source=twitter

It's nowhere near October, but one ensemble is already on track to be named the most controversial Halloween costume of 2015.

Social media users were out in full force on Monday criticizing several Halloween retailers for offering a Caitlyn Jenner costume reminiscent of the former-athlete's Vanity Fair cover earlier this year.

While Jenner's supporters condemned the costume as "transphobic" and "disgusting" on Twitter, Spirit Halloween, a retailer that carries the costume, defended the getup.

"At Spirit Halloween, we create a wide range of costumes that are often based upon celebrities, public figures, heroes and superheroes," said Lisa Barr, senior director of marking at Spirit Halloween. "We feel that Caitlyn Jenner is all of the above and that she should be celebrated. The Caitlyn Jenner costume reflects just that."
 
Just came here to post this. Is this guy for real? Really? The songs and videos are just so cringe, like a parody of alt rock. And the fake live videos, with the audio distorted to sound like its being captured on a phone.
It just seems like an elaborate and expensive hoax to me. Rather than a guy who for some reason just wants to pay to perform to a bunch of empty rooms.
I want to hear from his session musicians and the promoter.

Oh no, it's real. Venues in the UK are openly pissed off about it and the bands that have opened for him have openly talked about it too. I think this guy has mental issues like the many who audition for TV talent/music contest shows but unlike them he actually has money. I kinda' feel bad for the guy if that's the case. Also you won't hear anything from the promoter because as far as I'm aware he's the promoter.

Maybe that was the endgame? Turn a fake band with fake fans into something real via media attention?

That's what I thought at first but he's been at it for over two years, though I think this is the first time he actually done shows. I think he just has the same kind of mental issues as those who enter TV talent shows have.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: 1 person
Oh no, it's real. Venues in the UK are openly pissed off about it and the bands that have opened for him have openly talked about it too. I think this guy has mental issues like the many who audition for TV talent/music contest shows but unlike them he actually has money. I kinda' feel bad for the guy if that's the case. Also you won't hear anything from the promoter because as far as I'm aware he's the promoter.

Oh, I get that he's really out there playing and exploiting these venues. I just feel like he's not doing it just as a narcissist wannabe rockstar who wants to go on tour.
I feel like no one could be that oblivious, there must be a layer of irony here. :optimistic:
I guess I just want to think it's some kind of sub-warhol comment on fame in the self promoting age or some such.
 
Source:
https://metro.co.uk/2018/11/07/eeri...txbkjpteZxu7x5w45LzhmYlT_G2Fd596-QHznf1R8JBQY


On the eleventh hour, of the eleventh day, of the eleventh month, the guns fell silent.

It brought an end to four years of war which crippled Europe, leaving 17 million dead including 888,246 British or Colonial servicemen.

As we approach the centenary of the Armistice on November 11, the Imperial War Museum has released a recording of the moment the war ended, patched together using recordings from their collections.

The artillery activity it illustrates was recorded on the American front near the River Moselle, one minute before and one minute after the war ended.

Imperial War Museum approximate the end of WWI


sec_38802929-9a4a.jpg

After listening to the piece, Tom Davidson said: ‘This soundpiece took me completely by surprise. So moving. I never realised the big guns were firing right up to the hour.

‘I can only wonder at what the silence of the ceasefire meant to those in the trenches. This, then silence, then then The Last Post. Imagine.’

Another woman wrote on Twitter: ‘I spent 15 minutes listening to this over and over, feeling it rattle my bones and thinking about how those involved would have felt upon hearing the silence.’

The audio exhibit was created by sound designers Coda to Coda using a bone conductor, which converts sounds into vibrations.

It makes up part of the Imperial War Museum’s exhibition for the centenary of the Armistice, Making a New World.

Passage from Ernst Junger's Storm of Steel:

“The odd thing was that the little birds in the forest seemed quite untroubled by the myriad noise; they sat peaceably over the smoke in their battered boughs. In the short intervals of firing, we could hear them singing happily or ardently to one another”
 
Last edited:
"As we approach the centenary of the Armistice on November 11, the Imperial War Museum has released a recording of the moment the war ended, patched together using recordings from their collections."

See, that's cool and all, but the actual video itself says:

"Video: Imperial War Museum approximate the end of WWI Sound designers Coda to Coda used the graphic record from the IWM collections to recreate this audio of what the end of the First World War could have sounded like."

This recording's just a stitched-together simulation that uses stock sound effects, it's not remotely an actual WW1 recording or even a recreation from the information on that paper. You can very clearly hear the same stock explosions several times in a row. An actual WW1 recording would sound more like this:

 
Last edited:
This recording's just a stitched-together simulation that uses stock sound effects, it's not remotely an actual WW1 recording or even a recreation from the information on that paper. You can very clearly hear the same stock explosions several times in a row.
I had a feeling something was up, damn near sure I've heard all of those stock explosions used elsewhere. Starcraft maybe.
 
See, that's cool and all, but the actual video itself says:

"Video: Imperial War Museum approximate the end of WWI Sound designers Coda to Coda used the graphic record from the IWM collections to recreate this audio of what the end of the First World War could have sounded like."

This recording's just a stitched-together simulation that uses stock sound effects, it's not remotely an actual WW1 recording or even a recreation from the information on that paper. You can very clearly hear the same stock explosions several times in a row. An actual WW1 recording would sound more like this:

Oh come on, next you will be telling me this BBC produced reconstruction of the last moments of WW2 is inaccurate too
 
This recording's just a stitched-together simulation that uses stock sound effects, it's not remotely an actual WW1 recording or even a recreation from the information on that paper. You can very clearly hear the same stock explosions several times in a row.

Exactly. Conceptually it's still pretty powerful, but that's painfully obvious when you listen to it. It's not even particularly well done as a recreation.

This is the epitome of "really makes you think" memes. It's custom-made to go viral on Boomer Facebook pages just in time for Thanksgiving.
 
See, that's cool and all, but the actual video itself says:

"Video: Imperial War Museum approximate the end of WWI Sound designers Coda to Coda used the graphic record from the IWM collections to recreate this audio of what the end of the First World War could have sounded like."

This recording's just a stitched-together simulation that uses stock sound effects, it's not remotely an actual WW1 recording or even a recreation from the information on that paper. You can very clearly hear the same stock explosions several times in a row. An actual WW1 recording would sound more like this:

Okay I was thinking "This sounds way too clean and synchronized for a recording 100 years ago when audio recordings were still in their infancy". Also, explosions sounded staged and the distance of the sides seemed to be coming from the same spot.
 
See, that's cool and all, but the actual video itself says:

"Video: Imperial War Museum approximate the end of WWI Sound designers Coda to Coda used the graphic record from the IWM collections to recreate this audio of what the end of the First World War could have sounded like."

This recording's just a stitched-together simulation that uses stock sound effects, it's not remotely an actual WW1 recording or even a recreation from the information on that paper. You can very clearly hear the same stock explosions several times in a row. An actual WW1 recording would sound more like this:

I knew it was too good to be true
 
"There will come soft rains..."

Post the whole thing, don't be a coward.

There will come soft rains and the smell of the ground,
And swallows circling with their shimmering sound;

And frogs in the pools singing at night,
And wild plum-trees in tremulous white;

Robins will wear their feathery fire
Whistling their whims on a low fence-wire;

And not one will know of the war, not one
Will care at last when it is done.

Not one would mind, neither bird nor tree
If mankind perished utterly;

And Spring herself, when she woke at dawn,
Would scarcely know that we were gone.
 
Of course it wasn't real. Do you know what it would've taken to record even just sound back in the early 20th century?

Talk about an easy target.
 
Back