Is gender a social construct?

[traps-aren't-gay]

OP felt the need to make a thread on KiwiFarms to validate his thirst for lady cock.

never had any ladydick. but I'm sure it's better than mancock.

 

[Fascist Frederick]

Would there be a difference, in your opinion, between a person being born as a biological male and then later wishing to be treated as a female, and a person born caucasian and then later wishing to be treated as black?

 

[traps-aren't-gay]

Maybe, but it's also not perfectly normal to still find "her" attractive after seeing "her" penis.

THAT MAKES YOU GAY NIGGAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

NIGGER ends with an "r" dipshit. There's not even an "a" in there. Are you on drugs?

 

[inexplicable ethos]

nigga ends with an "r" dipshit. There's not even an "a" in there. Are you on drugs?

Oh man, the wordfilter makes this post SO much funnier than it would have been otherwise.

 

[traps-aren't-gay]

Would there be a difference, in your opinion, between a person being born as a biological male and then later wishing to be treated as a female, and a person born caucasian and then later wishing to be treated as black?

If others around them treated them as such, it doe not matter how they were born. If you look like a lady: your'e a lady. If you look like a nigger: you're a nigger

 

[traps-aren't-gay]

Oh man, the wordfilter makes this post SO much funnier than it would have been otherwise.

well shit. newfag detected I guess.

 

[Fascist Frederick]

If others around them treated them as such, it doe not matter how they were born. If you look like a lady: your'e a lady. If you look like a nigga: you're a nigga

But what if you don't look like a lady but still want to be one?

 

[traps-aren't-gay]

But what if you don't look like a lady but still want to be one?

then obviously you're not a lady. did you even read the OP?

 

[Fascist Frederick]

then obviously you're not a lady. did you even read the OP?

Then it's not so much a social construct as an audio/visual one.

 

[Occam's Spork]

This thread is complete faggotry, has no purpose, and is currently in the wrong subforum.

Go back to reddit, OP. Or halfchan. Anywhere but here would be fine.

 

[traps-aren't-gay]

Then it's not so much a social construct as an audio/visual one.

SOCIETY decides these things. What "society" is depends on perspective, of course. But the main idea is that: if the general consensus is that you are a lady; you're a lady.
Most trannies don't pass and must rely on the minority of SJW's for support. But that just further reflects the truth that the few that do pass would be treated like women until the truth of their situation is discovered.

 

[traps-aren't-gay]

WAAAH! ideas I don't like are being expressed in a forum dedicated to spreading new ideas!

get fucked, queer.

 

[inexplicable ethos]

get fucked, queer.

"Traps-aren't-gay" calling someone else a queer is a bit ironic, isn't it?

 

[Fascist Frederick]

SOCIETY decides these things. What "society" is depends on perspective, of course. But the main idea is that: if the general consensus is that you are a lady; you're a lady.
Most trannies don't pass and must rely on the minority of SJW's for support. But that just further reflects the truth that the few that do pass would be treated like women until the truth of their situation is discovered.

But if I went out into public looking super gay, it doesn't make me gay. Sucking dick would make me gay.

A man going out into public looking like a woman doesn't make him a woman.

 

[Occam's Spork]

get fucked, queer.

Your thoughts are neither deep, thought provoking, or novel. This is bad bait on the level of summerfag 4chan bullshit from 2012 and you need to up your game, get a brain ideally, or simply suckstart a shotgun, because nobody cares about your half baked opinions on trannies.

 

[wtfNeedSignUp]

If you see someone who looks like a woman, talks like a woman, acts like a woman, etc. you would treat it as a woman. That is: up until you discover that they have a dick under their skirt. At that point, there is some contention. But prior to this discovery you would treat this individual as if they were the sex they portrayed themselves as. And there's the bottom line.

That's like saying if there's cereal box that looks and feels legit, but in actuality filled with horseshit, then that means cereal are a social construct.

The whole idea that sex != gender is pure newspeak. Especially since 20 years ago the idea of women having the same interest as men was popular, while now liking something seen as girlish is proof that you need to get your dick chopped off.

 

[traps-aren't-gay]

"Traps-aren't-gay" calling someone else a queer is a bit ironic, isn't it?

yeah. this is a throwaway account made just to make this thread. You're a gay anyways.

But if I went out into public looking super gay, it doesn't make me gay. Sucking dick would make me gay.

A man going out into public looking like a woman doesn't make him a woman.

There is a bit of a disconnect between how you are perceived and who you are. That is actually MY point. If people perceive you as gay, you are socially gay. That doesn't make you personally gay though.

 

[traps-aren't-gay]

That's like saying if there's cereal box that looks and feels legit, but in actuality filled with horseshit, then that means cereal are a social construct.

The whole idea that sex != gender is pure newspeak. Especially since 20 years ago the idea of women having the same interest as men was popular, while now liking something seen as girlish is proof that you need to get your dick chopped off.

you do realize that successful M2F surgeries have been conducted at least since the Wiemar republic, right?

 

[inexplicable ethos]

you do realize that successful M2F surgeries have been conducted at least since the Wiemar republic, right?

I have yet to see a single successful sexual reassignment surgery even today.

 

[wtfNeedSignUp]

you do realize that successful M2F surgeries have been conducted at least since the Wiemar republic, right?

Did they still have 42% mortality rate back then? Also, having the push to rewrite the definition of gender be a century old doesn't mean that it's not newspeak.