G is intelligence, it's the general intelligence factor. High performance in one dimension predicts above average performance in others. Someone being highly creative (not just really good at tracing or playing music that someone else wrote) is correlated with them also having good logical reasoning skills. Someone being excellent at maths is correlated with them also performing well with languages. Someone being highly socially adept is correlated with them also being good at puzzles. Someone with a high g factor may really shine in some areas more than others but they're going to be an above average achiever overall. They're never going to score low on an IQ test but their score may not be as high as someone similarly intelligent but with aptitudes that are easier to test for.
Maybe arguing semantics here, but I think this is less a failure to notice patterns, and more a moral framework that interrupts the instinctive pattern noticing with alarm bells. Rich white Prog women are trained to suppress these instincts, and probably even take them as evidence of "muh unconscious bias" etc to be overcompensated for, which sometimes leaves them dead (usually the costs of their Luxury Beliefs fall on others who can't afford to live safely away from it, but every so often they come home to roost).
You sound like someone trying to tell me something has been proven by science in a tweet.
You know smart people generally score high on IQ tests and idiots score low. Call it a fluke or just plain dumb luck.
The Left hate hierarchy, and especially the idea that there are natural hierarchies, to the point they'll bulldoze everyone into poverty and starvation to prove their "blank slate" nonsense.
This is my experience as well, looking at both myself and others. But I often ask myself where you find the line between lack of interest and lack of ability. It's a bit of a chicken/egg thing. For example, most tech illiterate boomers could easily learn the nowadays idiot proof normie devices and software. They just flat out refuse to.
Basically what these people said, and I'll add that I especially agree with @Lurker Child when he says that IQ tests are mostly good at detecting morons rather than geniuses. Stupidity, for some reason, is rather easy to spot, whereas true intelligence can be damn near undetectable at times.
Thank you.
