Is it possible to create alternative media sites without them becoming an alt-right cum dumpster?

[byuu]

You can't have a shitposting place without autism.
And you can't have autism without maladjusted extremists.

 

[Dysnomia]

I don't mind alt-right posters as long as they don't fag up the site too much.

A person in the Buffalo thread said that OG Nazi propaganda showed families and prosperity and stuff, and modern alt-righters are all pessimistic "my race is dying" types obsessed with skulls, death, and the color black. They're probably all lifelong virgins too though, so I'm not worried about it too much.


Far left posters are much worse, as they don't have to deal with the onslaught of normies attacking their retarded positions as much as right leaning people. So it gives them carte blanche to act like self important assholes all the time.

I think that it attracts sad people who need someone to blame their problems on. If you think white people are dying off make more babies. I'm sure if you look hard enough you can find a girl that will shack up with anything with a dick, no matter how pathetic or ugly you are. Women like that are good for popping out five lil' bug eyed kiddos in five years. No problem.

Far left is too tranny infested. So you have to deal with that garbage.

It would be nice if people could just post their opinions without going full metal autism. But human nature dictates that must be the case.

 

[IAmNotAlpharius]

Either no politics or perhaps allow people to filter their feeds so they can be contained in their own spergy circlejerks.

 

[Duke Nukem]

Either no politics or perhaps allow people to filter their feeds so they can be contained in their own spergy circlejerks.

The Ignore button works just fine, I only reserve it for obvious schizos and spammers though. New posters tend to be the worst.

I think that it attracts sad people who need someone to blame their problems on. If you think white people are dying off make more babies. I'm sure if you look hard enough you can find a girl that will shack up with anything with a dick, no matter how pathetic or ugly you are. Women like that are good for popping out five lil' bug eyed kiddos in five years. No problem.

Far left is too tranny infested. So you have to deal with that garbage.

It would be nice if people could just post their opinions without going full metal autism. But human nature dictates that must be the case.

Maybe white girls don't want them? They can try others if they dial down the sperg a bit. Believe it or not there are plenty of non-white girls that wouldn't mind.

 

[Jarch6]

No. Normalfags and lefties don't get banned from normal websites so they have little reason to leave them whereas RWers do and thus tend to populate these sorts of internet ghettoes. The only exception to this rule is if the forum/site is dedicated to some niche (this site being dedicated to watching lolcows is an example of that and is why there is idealogical diversity on here) but even then those little forums have mostly been replaced by shit like Reddit and stackexchange so .

 

[Spud]

The banks would tell you to kick them off or lose the ability to process payments

 

[Mistress of Troon]

Well, people whose opinions are not tolerated in polite society will flock to alternative websites and at the moment this is mostly the case for so-called right-wing takes.
But even then, the quality of the opinions will diverge quite strongly and since the internet is accessible to anyone, you can count on seeing a lot of retard takes, no matter where you're going. While I understand why you complain about aut-right idiots turning any alternative website to shit, mind that a left-leaning person will probably say the same thing about woketards on Twitter. Democratic discourse naturally means that most opinions will be uninformed, unnuanced and outright stupid. If you want to prevent that, you would have to establish a website that engages in gatekeeping. This is easily done on a small website, but will become more and more difficult the bigger the site gets.

 

[WhatIsThePunchline]

Odysee is ok. Since it's a youtube alternative you don't get as much slapfights and since you setup your own feed you can just decide not to follow political channels. Content is obviously less than youtube but it's hard to get away from that. Some complain about buffering issues but I haven't had that many problems.

 

[Dom Cruise]

The internet all boils down to either far left or far right now, there's no middle ground.

I still cringe when I think about good online communities I used to be a part of and how I saw them in real time get ruined by going full Woke and TDS.

I simply can't deal with those fucking people, if anyone has never actually encountered true blue Wokesters online they are the worst pieces of shit imaginable, far right is much easier to deal with even if not necessarily great either.

But there's just something I find incredibly, deeply repulsive about Woke people, imagine someone with literally the mind of a toddler saying the most absurd bullshit and then viciously attacking you personally when you dare say the smallest thing against their bullshit.

 

[GHTD]

Far left or far right

Pick your poison

>believing the "there are no more moderates in the world" meme.
Shiggy.

 

[Welsh Catgirl Enjoyer]

If you're going for a general purpose media site, then it's possible. But it requires one key thing.

Include a unique selling point that isn't just "my site is YouTube but not run by YouTube"

Seriously. 95% of people don't give a shit about the culture wars, demonetisation, or any of the current hot-button issues. They're there for the content and features. If you don't have unique features, then the only people you're going to create an alt-right cum dumpster because the only people who are going to use your site will be those that can't use YouTube.

Stuff like collaboration videos that share views between multiple content creators, potentially even seemlessly stiching together these videos in some way, and stuff like picture-in-picture to allow for content like reactions to not cannibalise the original video would be good examples of these features.

 

[Cpl. Long Dong Silver]

Have you tried touching grass?

 

[Slap47]

No, because the "far-right" is literally the only thing censored.

And anyone that hosts them eventually gets deplatformed by the banks. So, will there be a viable alt media site without major, unlikely reforms? No

The most successful efforts to censor this very website came from the right and far-right. Shitholes like the UK and Australia have harsh censorship because conservatives work together with labor, and in the US conservatives go to great lengths to censor things (BDS, edgy books, swears, etc).

 

[The Ugly One]

The only way a leftist gets banned from anything mainstream is by fedposting too hard.

If you're going for a general purpose media site, then it's possible. But it requires one key thing.

Include a unique selling point that isn't just "my site is YouTube but not run by YouTube"

Seriously. 95% of people don't give a shit about the culture wars, demonetisation, or any of the current hot-button issues. They're there for the content and features. If you don't have unique features, then the only people you're going to create an alt-right cum dumpster because the only people who are going to use your site will be those that can't use YouTube.

Stuff like collaboration videos that share views between multiple content creators, potentially even seemlessly stiching together these videos in some way, and stuff like picture-in-picture to allow for content like reactions to not cannibalise the original video would be good examples of these features.

Remember when YouTube had reaction videos? Maybe bring back all the cool stuff YT keeps deleting because it makes megacorps have a sad.

 

[TroonsDid911]

The only way a leftist gets banned from anything mainstream is by fedposting too hard.


Remember when YouTube had reaction videos? Maybe bring back all the cool stuff YT keeps deleting because it makes megacorps have a sad.

An alternative media site would be able to facilitate those things for a short while, but once it becomes bigger the mega corps will send their kike lawyers to take everything down. Look at how quickly Youtube will delete content the moment a hooknose files a copyright claim even if it falls under fair use.

 

[TFT-A9]

If you're going for a general purpose media site, then it's possible. But it requires one key thing.

Include a unique selling point that isn't just "my site is YouTube but not run by YouTube"

Seriously. 95% of people don't give a shit about the culture wars, demonetisation, or any of the current hot-button issues. They're there for the content and features. If you don't have unique features, then the only people you're going to create an alt-right cum dumpster because the only people who are going to use your site will be those that can't use YouTube.

Stuff like collaboration videos that share views between multiple content creators, potentially even seemlessly stiching together these videos in some way, and stuff like picture-in-picture to allow for content like reactions to not cannibalise the original video would be good examples of these features.

there are way more reasons than "they banned me for my politics" to not use Youtube tbh but it's a reasonable assumption that an alternative media hosting site would attract both those who got banned for that AND those who are sick of the way YT handles flaggots/DMCAs/etc.

 

[The Ugly One]

An alternative media site would be able to facilitate those things for a short while, but once it becomes bigger the mega corps will send their kike lawyers to take everything down. Look at how quickly Youtube will delete content the moment a hooknose files a copyright claim even if it falls under fair use.

A lot of what YT deleted was due to Jew money, not Jew lawyers. Allowing free speech doesn't just allow people to say the dreaded nigger-word, causing every darkie in a 5-mile radius to instantly fail high school algebra. It also allows people to say how dumb a new movie trailer is, or respond to a millionaire talking head with a detailed rebuttal from my video game dungeon. YT got rid of all this stuff like 10+ years ago because they wanted corporate advertising revenue, and the old YT made it too easy for people who don't have rafts of money to get engagement.

The basic problem with old YT style is that it allowed organic engagement, which means that advertisers and sponsors couldn't really control it and therefore didn't want to pay for it.

 

[eternal dog mongler]

Seriously. 95% of people don't give a shit about the culture wars, demonetisation, or any of the current hot-button issues. They're there for the content and features. If you don't have unique features, then the only people you're going to create an alt-right cum dumpster because the only people who are going to use your site will be those that can't use YouTube.

For real, we've got YT clones and FB clones and Twitter clones that take no steps to actually be different.

Bilibili has danmu comments (those things that roll across the video while it's playing) and that would be awesome for content creators if they were able to curate them so you could let only a few through that you've picked and then turn on the floodgates during other parts of your video.

 

[Concho Pete]

The most successful efforts to censor this very website came from the right and far-right. Shitholes like the UK and Australia have harsh censorship because conservatives work together with labor, and in the US conservatives go to great lengths to censor things (BDS, edgy books, swears, etc).

REALLY? I'd really like to hear what you consider "far-right" in the UK or Australia with enough power to do anything let alone censor. What decade are you living in where things are censored from a conservative point of view? Kiwifarms isn't being banned and censored because it's a bastion of communism.

We all know the default culture here.

The GOP loves its BDS, a great reason never to vote for them. Sadly it's heavily bipartisan, though. Anything Israel or jewish typically is.

 

[Johnny Salami]

No. Most people aren't spergs that talk politics. So only political weirdos go to alt websites, the anime pfps, ethots, journos, normies, and degenerates stay on the mainstream