Yes. Those other Asians are completely differently, really are as "Asian" as Europeans are. The Malays are Muslims mostly, I think, brown people more culturally tied to India and the Indian Ocean. Really little to do with that Oriental civilization of China, Korea, Japan, and Vietnam.
Good point. German Swiss are the dominant type of Swiss, but not the only. They did have a civil war (Sonderbund) over religion (Protestants vs Catholics, those Catholics being Italian and French), but they didn't really persecute each other or anything.
They're multicultural, in the sense that the country isn't 90%+ Chinese ethnically. Many people would argue Switzerland is multicultural with 4 main languages/ethnic groups. America or the West in general homogenizes the East/Asians under one Azn "racial category", but the idea of Azns being a singular race of people does not exist in Asia. Chinks, Pajeets, Malays, and the smaller minority of Pakis/Sandniggers and Pinoys that live and work there all see themselves as being separate races/peoples and can be very ethno-tribalistic. As shown, there have been actual race riots between Chinks and other ethnicities in Singapore.
On a tangent, Western censuses like those in America categorize all Asians under an artificial racial category that includes East Asians and South Asians as being Asian Americans. But there is (shocker) no unity among them. A Chindian (Chinese + Indian mix) from Singapore I met saw himself as "mixed-race" and both his Chink and Pajeet sides of the family did not see "racial unity". The Pajeets is seen as brown while the Chinks are yellow/Oriental and would hate for you to say they're brown (like a Pajeet).
I'm sorry for having three replies in a row, but I didn't notice this response. China's a good example to bring up. I don't think Singapore is comparable. On paper, China has 55 recognized ethnic minorities, but in reality, the Han Chinks dominate society and many minorities are expected to assimilate into Han Chinese culture. This is expected since they make up around 91-92% of the population, and this is from a country of 1.4B. Furthermore, they do not have a sense of tolerance/PC culture like in America.
Assuming you mean the Uyghur camps, it's noted that other ethnic minorities are fine in the country. I'm assuming it's because Uyghurs are louder or do typical Muzzie shit that the Chinese government doesn't like (though it doesn't seem like other Muzzie minorities like the Central Asians (Kazkhs, Tajiks) seem to not be targeted):
It's defacto a Chinese dominated country since non-Chinese people stay within designated ethnic counties/prefectures/provinces and there are very few prominent non-Chinese in the CCP who are leaders outside of those ethnic areas.
The Uyghurs are definitely persecuted because they have an active and violent independence movement plus have ISIS/Al-Qaeda activity, so more innocent Uyghurs get wrapped up with the actual criminals. For comparison, the less active and violent Tibetan independence movement has resulted in a lot fewer people in camps now (but this was not the case 60 years ago). That said, the Uyghur people as a whole are not persecuted in China and there are prominent Uyghur CCP politicians in Xinjiang and even outside Xinjiang and the region is nominally autonomous (beside the XPCC colonies).
This is very interesting pont tbh. To think of it, there are more similarities between "a soviet man" (or a Russian aka Россиянин) and "afro-american/asian-american" . Those are new identities which have no ground and no roots. Blacks living in Africa are in fact incredibly diverse folks. Nigeria, Chad, and Kenya are going to be as different as Sweden and Norway. Each country has distict culture, background, religion, and language. But most niggas in the US have no culture at all because looting, twerk, KFC, and "sheeet" is not a culture. Those people have basically lost their roots. Some nigga is gonna say "what about jazz, rap, etc", but cmon look at the US black population and say how many of them are productive citizens? Another side of that problem that the left makes it even worse by promoting the image of "constant victim" among the blacks.
African Americans lost their culture by design thanks to corporations taking advantage of the fact that people on welfare (thanks LBJ) make for ready consoomers and the crack epidemic and gangster rap (thanks CIA) finished it off. But they used to have their own culture that was a mix of Southern whites and African traditions.
I don't see it as damning in the slightest. Multiculturalism means minority cultures should know their place.
This is an understatement. The predominantly Nilotic peoples of Kenya are as different to Nigeria’s primarily Volta-Niger population as a Dutchman is to a Georgian or a Tatar. The Semitic peoples who make up Ethiopia and Eritrea are also their own distinct (and historically very fascinating) civilization with their own unique physiological features that aren’t really found elsewhere. The Khoisan peoples of Southwestern Africa also have very distinct features and cultures and aren’t really related to the hundreds of Bantu ethnicities that make up most of Central Africa. Plus there are the Pygmy peoples who are their own strange category. There really isn’t a pan-“African” category that can be honestly made. The continent is far too enormous and varied in terms of ethnic make up, environment, history and levels of development.
