- Joined
- Mar 28, 2021
Consider the following:
Assuming time is an axis of space, the universe moves in time as well as in space. Wouldn't a time machine not only need to move in negative time, but also in precisely the reverse of the motion of the earth, solar system, galaxy, expansion of the universe, etc in order to arrive at the "right spot" in space and time? Sure, it could move linearly, but then wouldn't there be an extreme chance of colliding with something like a bug on a windshield? And wouldn't it take a near infinite amount of power to match the reversed speed and direction of the universe? That's assuming you travel 1 for 1, taking 70 years to the millisecond to travel back 70 years. You'd need even more power to accelerate then decelerate so your travel time is at most 30 seconds like in the movies... How could we achieve such power without getting crushed or vaporized in the process? Wrong/Spergy answers only.
Assuming time is an axis of space, the universe moves in time as well as in space. Wouldn't a time machine not only need to move in negative time, but also in precisely the reverse of the motion of the earth, solar system, galaxy, expansion of the universe, etc in order to arrive at the "right spot" in space and time? Sure, it could move linearly, but then wouldn't there be an extreme chance of colliding with something like a bug on a windshield? And wouldn't it take a near infinite amount of power to match the reversed speed and direction of the universe? That's assuming you travel 1 for 1, taking 70 years to the millisecond to travel back 70 years. You'd need even more power to accelerate then decelerate so your travel time is at most 30 seconds like in the movies... How could we achieve such power without getting crushed or vaporized in the process? Wrong/Spergy answers only.